Transformers and More @ The Seibertron Store
Details subject to change. See listing for latest price and availability.
New York may ban iPods while crossing street
NEW YORK (Reuters) - New Yorkers who blithely cross the street listening to an iPod or talking on a cell phone could soon face a $100 fine.
New York State Sen. Carl Kruger says three pedestrians in his Brooklyn district have been killed since September upon stepping into traffic while distracted by an electronic device. In one case bystanders screamed "watch out" to no avail.
Kruger says he will introduce legislation on Wednesday to ban the use of gadgets such as Blackberry devices and video games while crossing the street.
"Government has an obligation to protect its citizenry," Kruger said in a telephone interview from Albany, the state capital. "This electronic gadgetry is reaching the point where it's becoming not only endemic but it's creating an atmosphere where we have a major public safety crisis at hand."
Tech-consuming New Yorkers trudge to work on sidewalks and subways like an army of drones, appearing to talk to themselves on wireless devices or swaying to seemingly silent tunes.
"I'm not trying to intrude on that," Kruger said. "But what's happening is when they're tuning into their iPod or Blackberry or cell phone or video game, they're walking into speeding buses and moving automobiles. It's becoming a nationwide problem."
Leonardo wrote:Take your lips off my pipe!
Ironhidensh wrote:I don't know about this bill, but I do think Police should be given the ability to shoot on site dumbass idiots talking on thier cell phones while driving.
DesalationReborn wrote:My dad does both at the same time, and he's the head of an industrial chemicals company and gets calls every hour of the day. But he uses a headset for just to keep hands and eyes where they need. Not everyone that chooses to multi-task like that is a moron-- the tech depends on the descresion of the person using it.
Kjell wrote:DesalationReborn wrote:My dad does both at the same time, and he's the head of an industrial chemicals company and gets calls every hour of the day. But he uses a headset for just to keep hands and eyes where they need. Not everyone that chooses to multi-task like that is a moron-- the tech depends on the descresion of the person using it.
Whether he usesa hands-free or not is pretty much irrelevant. The distraction is in that he's engaged in a conversation while driving. It still impacts his driving. It's still not a very good idea.
Leonardo wrote:Take your lips off my pipe!
Loki120 wrote:Kjell wrote:DesalationReborn wrote:My dad does both at the same time, and he's the head of an industrial chemicals company and gets calls every hour of the day. But he uses a headset for just to keep hands and eyes where they need. Not everyone that chooses to multi-task like that is a moron-- the tech depends on the descresion of the person using it.
Whether he usesa hands-free or not is pretty much irrelevant. The distraction is in that he's engaged in a conversation while driving. It still impacts his driving. It's still not a very good idea.
No it's not. It's been pretty much proven that talking on a cell phone while driving increasing your risk of an accident, regardless if your using a handless set or not.
Tammuz wrote:that too, does also decrease concentration on the road though not always to a a degree as a phonecall, as there are 2 pairs of eyes in the car.
......I could see that potentially increasing the number of people that fall asleep behind the wheel....Tammuz wrote:but the recent study shows that fiddling with the radio, also produces the same distraction, which is why there has been a recent change to uk law, which prohibits nearly everything that requires a driver to do anything but drive....
YouFearGalvatron wrote:Cell phones/iPods are just meaningless toys, distractions from something I like to call living.
I ride motorcycles every day, and people on their cell phones have nearly had me run off the rode or ran over COUNTLESS times. They seem too occupied with that phone or their designer $5 frappochinolatte, behind the wheel of their land yacht that they do not need.
If someone gets killed pretending to talk to someone on their cell, it is their fault.
I shed no tears for pretentious dolts.
It helps clean our gene pool.
Kjell wrote:Whether he uses a hands-free or not is pretty much irrelevant. The distraction is in that he's engaged in a conversation while driving. It still impacts his driving. It's still not a very good idea.
Dark Zarak wrote:Kjell wrote:Whether he uses a hands-free or not is pretty much irrelevant. The distraction is in that he's engaged in a conversation while driving. It still impacts his driving. It's still not a very good idea.
So they should ban talking while driving? Two people sitting in a car should remain silent at all times?
The distraction is in the hands. It's like eating while driving.
Registered users: Asuble, Bing [Bot], blokefish, Glyph, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Google Feedfetcher, MSN [Bot], Nemesis Primal, Ziusundra