Transformers and More @ The Seibertron Store










Details subject to change. See listing for latest price and availability.
Shadowman wrote:sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:A plot can involve the Ventriloquist taking revenge on mob families by targeting their children.Wether killing them, torturing them or holding them for money.
No one wants to see a movie about children being killed and tortured and I'm amazed you'd even suggest something so horrible. If the next movie IS about that, I wouldn't even bother with it.sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:Seems to fit the style and tenure of these films perfectly.
No, it most certainly doesn't.
To put it simply: A ventriloquist dummy is not a realistic villain in any way. There is no two ways about this.
Predaprince wrote:I am very thankful to have posters like sto_vo_kor_2000 who is so energetic about improving others' understanding and enjoyment of the TF universe
Stormrider wrote:You often add interesting insights to conversations that makes the fledglings think and challenges even the sharpest minds
T-Macksimus wrote:I consider you and editor to be amongst the most "scholarly" in terms of your knowledge, demeanor and general approach
sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:The ventriloquist is the villain not the dummy.
And what could be more realistic then a villian with a physiological problem??
sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:I can understand if you dont like the idea....but it does fit with Nolans style of Bat films.
Wigglez wrote:Just remember. The sword is an extension of your arm. Use it as if you're going to karate chop someone with your really long sharp ass hand.
Shadowman wrote:It doesn't matter who the real villain is! It's a guy with a ventriloquist dummy, that's still not a realistic villain!
A villain with psychological problems is one thing, the movies have dealt with Two-Face. But a villain who expresses it through a doll is not a realistic villain. I mean, how would he even fight Batman?
No, it doesn't. Nolan's movies are about vigilantism against organized crime and the consequences of doing so, specifically retaliation. Not ventriloquism gone bad.
Predaprince wrote:I am very thankful to have posters like sto_vo_kor_2000 who is so energetic about improving others' understanding and enjoyment of the TF universe
Stormrider wrote:You often add interesting insights to conversations that makes the fledglings think and challenges even the sharpest minds
T-Macksimus wrote:I consider you and editor to be amongst the most "scholarly" in terms of your knowledge, demeanor and general approach
sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:right..........like a villian wearing a burlap sack and useing a fear gas calling himseld "The Scarecrow" is more realistic .
Or like a guy wearing clown make up, calling himself the joker is more realistic.
sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:Neither were really realistic concepts till Nolan found a way.
sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:Besides....the Ventriloquist and Scarface always employed others for those things.
Wigglez wrote:Just remember. The sword is an extension of your arm. Use it as if you're going to karate chop someone with your really long sharp ass hand.
Roadbuster wrote:If not the Ventrilloquist and Scarface, how about Killer Croc?
Shadowman wrote:sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:right..........like a villian wearing a burlap sack and useing a fear gas calling himseld "The Scarecrow" is more realistic .
Or like a guy wearing clown make up, calling himself the joker is more realistic.
Scarecrow was a psychology expert who used a biochemical weapon to cause intense frightening hallucination in his victims, and used that mask to spray the toxin, protect himself from it, and use it's visage to exacerbate the hallucinations. The Joker was a psychotic criminal genius who loved to cause panic and chaos, and had tons and tons of contingency plans, and above all else, wanted to prove that everyone is as deranged as he is.
Also, I can't believe you of all people forgot this, none of the characters took either of them seriously at first. Falcone was unimpressed with Crane's mask, and even Crane said it doesn't have an effect on sane people. Everyone though the Joker was ridiculous at first, too. No one took him seriously until he started making his really big power plays. Batman even thought he wasn't a threat at first. "One man or the entire mob? He can wait."
I agree with you, to an extent, though. Despite having somewhat unrealistic aspects, they were still portrayed realistically.
How can you possibly portray a ventriloquist dummy as a realistic, threatening villain? I have an imagination, and I can make sense of just about anything. But if it's between a guy with a ventriloquist dummy and a man in hastily applied clown make-up holding a knife to my face chattering about why he's an insane criminal, guess which one I'm more intimidated by?
Of course he does, almost all of Batman's villains do. But you may recall that Batman's best villains can also take him in a fist-fight.
Predaprince wrote:I am very thankful to have posters like sto_vo_kor_2000 who is so energetic about improving others' understanding and enjoyment of the TF universe
Stormrider wrote:You often add interesting insights to conversations that makes the fledglings think and challenges even the sharpest minds
T-Macksimus wrote:I consider you and editor to be amongst the most "scholarly" in terms of your knowledge, demeanor and general approach
NewFoundStarscreamLuv wrote:me and my friends combine all the time. Sometimes I even combine by myself if no one is around.
sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:Roadbuster wrote:If not the Ventrilloquist and Scarface, how about Killer Croc?
While I think Nolan can pull it off, I dont think Croc is the type of character he's looking for.
The Legend wrote: In Nolan's more grounded universe you'd be taking away that mystery behind the character.
Chaoslock wrote:
Kroc is just a brute, just as Bane, and I don't think either of them could pull a movie alone.
As I understood Sto_vo_kors idea about Ventriloquist, it would be dangerously close to the first Saw movies villain (little scary puppet, abducting people, etc...)
Predaprince wrote:I am very thankful to have posters like sto_vo_kor_2000 who is so energetic about improving others' understanding and enjoyment of the TF universe
Stormrider wrote:You often add interesting insights to conversations that makes the fledglings think and challenges even the sharpest minds
T-Macksimus wrote:I consider you and editor to be amongst the most "scholarly" in terms of your knowledge, demeanor and general approach
Chaoslock wrote:sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:Roadbuster wrote:If not the Ventrilloquist and Scarface, how about Killer Croc?
While I think Nolan can pull it off, I dont think Croc is the type of character he's looking for.
Kroc is just a brute, just as Bane, and I don't think either of them could pull a movie alone.
As I understood Sto_vo_kors idea about Ventriloquist, it would be dangerously close to the first Saw movies villain (little scary puppet, abducting people, etc...)
sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:They way I see the story unfolding there might be some question as to wether or not theres really a "dummy" being used or just a short guy that sticks to the shadows.
sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:You know, in all these years I havent seen a Saw film.
The Legend wrote:Bane wasn't just a brute.
Wigglez wrote:Just remember. The sword is an extension of your arm. Use it as if you're going to karate chop someone with your really long sharp ass hand.
Shadowman wrote:So it's either a crazy guy with a puppet or a guy with a midget on his lap? And I'm supposed to take either of those seriously as antagonists?
It's about this murderer called Jigsaw who puts his victims through "games" meant as ironic punishment, though he designs the "games" so that his victims can still escape. (They usually don't) He tends to introduce each game using a distinct puppet as his avatar.
Predaprince wrote:I am very thankful to have posters like sto_vo_kor_2000 who is so energetic about improving others' understanding and enjoyment of the TF universe
Stormrider wrote:You often add interesting insights to conversations that makes the fledglings think and challenges even the sharpest minds
T-Macksimus wrote:I consider you and editor to be amongst the most "scholarly" in terms of your knowledge, demeanor and general approach
sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:Shadowman wrote:So it's either a crazy guy with a puppet or a guy with a midget on his lap? And I'm supposed to take either of those seriously as antagonists?
I never said it would "actully" be a midget/little guy.
Just that it should be filmed in a way that both the audience and the characters in the film are unaware that he's a puppet.
Wigglez wrote:Just remember. The sword is an extension of your arm. Use it as if you're going to karate chop someone with your really long sharp ass hand.
Shadowman wrote:So it's either a crazy guy with a puppet or a guy with a midget on his lap...and they never tell you which?
It doesn't actually matter which because I can't take either one seriously.
You know Scarface actually appeared in Batman: Arkham Asylum. Joker played around with it for a minute but decided it was useless and to give it back to the Ventriloquist.
Predaprince wrote:I am very thankful to have posters like sto_vo_kor_2000 who is so energetic about improving others' understanding and enjoyment of the TF universe
Stormrider wrote:You often add interesting insights to conversations that makes the fledglings think and challenges even the sharpest minds
T-Macksimus wrote:I consider you and editor to be amongst the most "scholarly" in terms of your knowledge, demeanor and general approach
sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:Shadowman wrote:So it's either a crazy guy with a puppet or a guy with a midget on his lap...and they never tell you which?
I dont mean to sound rude but....did you understand what I ment??
No midjet, its just filmed in a way that gives you reason to question wether or not your really seeing a short guy or a dummy.
sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:But you can take a guy in a burlap sack seriously??
Wigglez wrote:Just remember. The sword is an extension of your arm. Use it as if you're going to karate chop someone with your really long sharp ass hand.
Shadowman wrote:How is that any different from what I said? It's filmed in a way that you can't tell if it's a crazy guy with a puppet or a guy with a midget on his lap.
A guy in a burlap sack alone? No, of course not. A guy in a burlap sack who's favorite pastime is spraying you with weaponized hallucinogens, though...
Predaprince wrote:I am very thankful to have posters like sto_vo_kor_2000 who is so energetic about improving others' understanding and enjoyment of the TF universe
Stormrider wrote:You often add interesting insights to conversations that makes the fledglings think and challenges even the sharpest minds
T-Macksimus wrote:I consider you and editor to be amongst the most "scholarly" in terms of your knowledge, demeanor and general approach
sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:Shadowman wrote:A guy in a burlap sack alone? No, of course not. A guy in a burlap sack who's favorite pastime is spraying you with weaponized hallucinogens, though...
Sorry but I dont see how that makes that big a difference.
Shadowman wrote:Scarecrow was a psychology expert who used a biochemical weapon to cause intense frightening hallucination in his victims, and used that mask to spray the toxin, protect himself from it, and use it's visage to exacerbate the hallucinations. The Joker was a psychotic criminal genius who loved to cause panic and chaos, and had tons and tons of contingency plans, and above all else, wanted to prove that everyone is as deranged as he is.
Shadowman wrote:The other villains got by because we already knew what they were capable of. Joker was Batman's most dangerous enemy for good reason. Scarecrow loved spraying people with hallucinogens that made them see their worst fears. Ra's Al Ghul was a terrorist with almost unlimited resources. Two-Face was a psychotic vigilante who would leave his victim's fate in the hands of a coin. They all had some unrealistic element but you could still take them all seriously as antagonists.
Wigglez wrote:Just remember. The sword is an extension of your arm. Use it as if you're going to karate chop someone with your really long sharp ass hand.
Shadowman wrote:What I meant is that design alone isn't his main characteristic. Scarecrow loves spraying people with hallucinogens, Joker loves mass chaos, Bane can punch a hole through a brick wall. They all have a defining characteristic independent from their design that makes them serious, major threats.
And we're now going around in circles because I already explained all of this to you. Twice.
So please, just to finish all of this off, I need to ask: What can Scarface and Ventriloquist do that puts them in league with Batman's A-list villains? And I don't mean "What could they change to make it seem like he's on par with Joker." I mean what does he do that makes him a capable villain?
Remember, Nolan didn't make any major changes to any of the villains, he simply took away an aspect of them. Joker's personality was toned down and he lost his gadgets, Scarecrow's suit was changed to just a mask and spray bottles, Ra's lost his Lazarus pits, and Two-Face was reverted to a psychotic vigilante.
Predaprince wrote:I am very thankful to have posters like sto_vo_kor_2000 who is so energetic about improving others' understanding and enjoyment of the TF universe
Stormrider wrote:You often add interesting insights to conversations that makes the fledglings think and challenges even the sharpest minds
T-Macksimus wrote:I consider you and editor to be amongst the most "scholarly" in terms of your knowledge, demeanor and general approach
sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:I feel some major changes were made.
Wigglez wrote:Just remember. The sword is an extension of your arm. Use it as if you're going to karate chop someone with your really long sharp ass hand.
Jeep! wrote:Why do I imagine Dead Metal sounding exactly like Arnie?
Intah-wib-buls?
Blurrz wrote:10/10
Leave it to Dead Metal to have the word 'Pronz' in his signature.
Dead Metal wrote:I'm hoping for the Penguin. He fits the Nolan style and the only changes they would have to make to make him work in the Nolan movies is his nose and his hands (never realised they where the way they where to make him look more like a penguin I always just assumed he liked the birds so much) and maybe some of his more outlandish umbrella weapons. he can keep the gun and sword ones as weapons like that actually do exist and are possible, or where those walking sticks? who cares almost the same thing.
He could try and take over the Gotham underworld while campaigning against Batman to fool the city officials.
The only way I could see the Ventriloquist and Scare face working in these movies would be if the Ventriloquist would be a crazy mob boss who's a ventriloquist only as a cover identity to get people to trust him and who thinks his puppet is alive just to realise it's not when he expects it to help him against Batman. But I don't know to me he seems to be more convincing as a cartoon villain.
Killer Crock would work as a overly strong henchman the main villain would use against Batman kinda like Scarecrow in Batman Begins but in order for that to work he would have to be designed differently, maybe a guy with sharpened teeth wearing dark green armour?
Roadbuster wrote:Dead Metal wrote:I'm hoping for the Penguin. He fits the Nolan style and the only changes they would have to make to make him work in the Nolan movies is his nose and his hands (never realised they where the way they where to make him look more like a penguin I always just assumed he liked the birds so much) and maybe some of his more outlandish umbrella weapons. he can keep the gun and sword ones as weapons like that actually do exist and are possible, or where those walking sticks? who cares almost the same thing.
He could try and take over the Gotham underworld while campaigning against Batman to fool the city officials.
The only way I could see the Ventriloquist and Scare face working in these movies would be if the Ventriloquist would be a crazy mob boss who's a ventriloquist only as a cover identity to get people to trust him and who thinks his puppet is alive just to realise it's not when he expects it to help him against Batman. But I don't know to me he seems to be more convincing as a cartoon villain.
Killer Crock would work as a overly strong henchman the main villain would use against Batman kinda like Scarecrow in Batman Begins but in order for that to work he would have to be designed differently, maybe a guy with sharpened teeth wearing dark green armour?
it was my understanding that penguin was on the "No" list. Hoenstly, I wouldn't take a guy running around in a tux, wearing a monical and tophat seriously. As for the plot, didn't Burton already do that, aside the mob stuff?
My idea for Croc was to have the filed sharp teeth, but with surgical alterations to his face to appear more reptilian and having a full body tattoo to resemble a crocodile skin and prone to cannibalistic tendancies. Such disorders as believing to have an underlying animal within you do exist. I've seen specials of people who went as far as to have their appearance dramatically altered to resemble an animal, like a cat. But in Croc's case, he crosses the big line.
Jeep! wrote:Why do I imagine Dead Metal sounding exactly like Arnie?
Intah-wib-buls?
Blurrz wrote:10/10
Leave it to Dead Metal to have the word 'Pronz' in his signature.
Shadowman wrote:Like what? Give me some examples here.
And you never answered my question: What do Scarface/Ventriloquist do that puts them on par with Batman's other villains?
Dead Metal wrote:I'm hoping for the Penguin. He fits the Nolan style and the only changes they would have to make to make him work in the Nolan movies is his nose and his hands (never realised they where the way they where to make him look more like a penguin
The only way I could see the Ventriloquist and Scare face working in these movies would be if the Ventriloquist would be a crazy mob boss who's a ventriloquist only as a cover identity to get people to trust him and who thinks his puppet is alive just to realise it's not when he expects it to help him against Batman.
Predaprince wrote:I am very thankful to have posters like sto_vo_kor_2000 who is so energetic about improving others' understanding and enjoyment of the TF universe
Stormrider wrote:You often add interesting insights to conversations that makes the fledglings think and challenges even the sharpest minds
T-Macksimus wrote:I consider you and editor to be amongst the most "scholarly" in terms of your knowledge, demeanor and general approach
sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:What do you mean I didnt answer??.
I already gave 2 ideas for the character.
Wigglez wrote:Just remember. The sword is an extension of your arm. Use it as if you're going to karate chop someone with your really long sharp ass hand.
Registered users: Bing [Bot], Bumblevivisector, Cyber Bishop, Glyph, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Google Feedfetcher, MSN [Bot], xRotorstormx, Yahoo [Bot]