Transformers and More @ The Seibertron Store

Details subject to change. See listing for latest price and availability.
william-james88 wrote:SlyTF1 wrote:Burn wrote:What's this? The biggest fan of the movies is not spewing praise like always?
Bay's absence was definitely felt. The movie lacked the sense of scale and "epicness" he brought to the table. There were a handful of scenes I thought were going to build up to an awesome payoff, but then they'd just cut back to an overly goofy joke or something. And the music was terrible. Completely laughable, especially the military theme. It made them feel like cartoon characters instead of a real threat.
But I will say the fight scenes were probably the best in the series. Too bad they were just so few and far between. I definitely liked the movie better than The Last Knight, and it wasn't a bad movie. Just didn't blow me away like I wanted it to.
You know, I always liked you Sly. You always voiced your opinion well, even if it was unpopular and you don't mind people challenging you on it, always answering with heart. And what i like best is that even though you are a fan of the Bay films, you are not a blind follower, you will call him out on missteps, like TLK.
As for the idea of not needing the parents, you bring good arguments. It is not necessary for character growth. The best example is Stranger things. We really dont spend much time with the main character's parents even though they are young teenagers. Of ourse, there's Will's mom but she is an actual main character. SNL even made a joke that we never see Lucas' parents. And its not even a movie, its a whole show. The creators knew that showing interactions with all the parents was uneccesary and preffered to focus on the kids' interaction with the otherworldy aspects. And this is a great comparison to BB because oth BB and Strangers things rely heavily on 80s Nosalgia and Amblin films.15ngcs1 wrote:
So far it's 100% on Rotten Tomatoes.
Did you know that Age of Exinction was as well before more critics saw it? Not saying it will sink at all, I just always found that funny. And anyways, 100% just means no one hated the film, which is very different than saying its a great movie.
15ngcs1 wrote:Definitely not 100% at the beginning for Age of Extinction.
william-james88 wrote:15ngcs1 wrote:Definitely not 100% at the beginning for Age of Extinction.
It was. There were only 3 reviews and they were all positive, making the film 100% at first. It then sunk super low
Reviewer 1: "Like, totes kewl movie, dudes!"15ngcs1 wrote:william-james88 wrote:15ngcs1 wrote:Definitely not 100% at the beginning for Age of Extinction.
It was. There were only 3 reviews and they were all positive, making the film 100% at first. It then sunk super low
LMAO what were they thinking
Shadowman wrote:This is Sabrblade we're talking about. His ability to store trivial information about TV shows is downright superhuman.
Caelus wrote:My wife pointed out something interesting about the prehistoric Predacons. I said that everyone was complaining because transforming for them mostly consisted of them just standing up-right. She essentially said, 'So? That's what our ancestors did.'
Sabrblade wrote:Reviewer 1: "Like, totes kewl movie, dudes!"15ngcs1 wrote:william-james88 wrote:15ngcs1 wrote:Definitely not 100% at the beginning for Age of Extinction.
It was. There were only 3 reviews and they were all positive, making the film 100% at first. It then sunk super low
LMAO what were they thinking
Reviewer 2: "I know, right?"
Reviewer 3: "Chaah!"
william-james88 wrote:15ngcs1 wrote:Definitely not 100% at the beginning for Age of Extinction.
It was. There were only 3 reviews and they were all positive, making the film 100% at first. It then sunk super low
SlyTF1 wrote:william-james88 wrote:15ngcs1 wrote:Definitely not 100% at the beginning for Age of Extinction.
It was. There were only 3 reviews and they were all positive, making the film 100% at first. It then sunk super low
I remember that. I think about it every day. I still think it's some type of conspiracy that it dropped so low.
Va'al wrote:Deadput wrote:Actually I don't know my mother's name is Valerie so is Va'al actually my mother?
Yes. Now go to your room and don't play with yourself.
SlyTF1 wrote:william-james88 wrote:15ngcs1 wrote:Definitely not 100% at the beginning for Age of Extinction.
It was. There were only 3 reviews and they were all positive, making the film 100% at first. It then sunk super low
I remember that. I think about it every day. I still think it's some type of conspiracy that it dropped so low.
SW's SilverHammer wrote:Eat my ass funpub.
Burn wrote:And this is for taking Nemesis Maximo seriously.
*high fives Silly in the face*
carytheone wrote:I can't be assed to do any better right now.
“Okay, I’m going to be controversial,” Di Bonaventura said. “I’m not a fan of Unicron. It’s too big. It’s so big it’s beyond any sort of relatable thing I think, for me personally. That doesn’t mean it’s not going to be in the series someday. I don’t know that I’ve thought much about it honestly because we’ve been focused on this movie.”
They already did put Unicron in these movies, he was in The Last Knight. Why's he acting like they haven't?carytheone wrote:Here's an interesting little snippet about Unicron.“Okay, I’m going to be controversial,” Di Bonaventura said. “I’m not a fan of Unicron. It’s too big. It’s so big it’s beyond any sort of relatable thing I think, for me personally. That doesn’t mean it’s not going to be in the series someday. I don’t know that I’ve thought much about it honestly because we’ve been focused on this movie.”
The whole article is about the future of the franchise.
https://www.slashfilm.com/transformers-reboot/
Shadowman wrote:This is Sabrblade we're talking about. His ability to store trivial information about TV shows is downright superhuman.
Caelus wrote:My wife pointed out something interesting about the prehistoric Predacons. I said that everyone was complaining because transforming for them mostly consisted of them just standing up-right. She essentially said, 'So? That's what our ancestors did.'
That is not the Unicron you are looking for.Sabrblade wrote:They already did put Unicron in these movies, he was in The Last Knight. Why's he acting like they haven't?carytheone wrote:Here's an interesting little snippet about Unicron.“Okay, I’m going to be controversial,” Di Bonaventura said. “I’m not a fan of Unicron. It’s too big. It’s so big it’s beyond any sort of relatable thing I think, for me personally. That doesn’t mean it’s not going to be in the series someday. I don’t know that I’ve thought much about it honestly because we’ve been focused on this movie.”
The whole article is about the future of the franchise.
https://www.slashfilm.com/transformers-reboot/
Well, if the TLK app timeline is any indication, it looks more like they already tried to retcon away ROTF and half of DOTM, so what's one more piece of the broken puzzle at this point, heh.carytheone wrote:That is not the Unicron you are looking for.Sabrblade wrote:They already did put Unicron in these movies, he was in The Last Knight. Why's he acting like they haven't?carytheone wrote:Here's an interesting little snippet about Unicron.“Okay, I’m going to be controversial,” Di Bonaventura said. “I’m not a fan of Unicron. It’s too big. It’s so big it’s beyond any sort of relatable thing I think, for me personally. That doesn’t mean it’s not going to be in the series someday. I don’t know that I’ve thought much about it honestly because we’ve been focused on this movie.”
The whole article is about the future of the franchise.
https://www.slashfilm.com/transformers-reboot/
I think they are trying to retcon TLK away.
Shadowman wrote:This is Sabrblade we're talking about. His ability to store trivial information about TV shows is downright superhuman.
Caelus wrote:My wife pointed out something interesting about the prehistoric Predacons. I said that everyone was complaining because transforming for them mostly consisted of them just standing up-right. She essentially said, 'So? That's what our ancestors did.'
I'm ok with that. I'm not a big fan of the movies nor do I have a problem with them. I enjoy each one for what it is. Like bubblegum, chew it until the flavor is gone and spit it out. I am cautiously excited for the Bee movie. The reviews seem to be pretty favorable and hopefully they'll continue the trend.Sabrblade wrote:Well, if the TLK app timeline is any indication, it looks more like they already tried to retcon away ROTF and half of DOTM, so what's one more piece of the broken puzzle at this point, heh.carytheone wrote:That is not the Unicron you are looking for.Sabrblade wrote:They already did put Unicron in these movies, he was in The Last Knight. Why's he acting like they haven't?carytheone wrote:Here's an interesting little snippet about Unicron.“Okay, I’m going to be controversial,” Di Bonaventura said. “I’m not a fan of Unicron. It’s too big. It’s so big it’s beyond any sort of relatable thing I think, for me personally. That doesn’t mean it’s not going to be in the series someday. I don’t know that I’ve thought much about it honestly because we’ve been focused on this movie.”
The whole article is about the future of the franchise.
https://www.slashfilm.com/transformers-reboot/
[img]tired_ass_cliche[/img]
I think they are trying to retcon TLK away.
Shadowman wrote:This is Sabrblade we're talking about. His ability to store trivial information about TV shows is downright superhuman.
Caelus wrote:My wife pointed out something interesting about the prehistoric Predacons. I said that everyone was complaining because transforming for them mostly consisted of them just standing up-right. She essentially said, 'So? That's what our ancestors did.'
Va'al wrote:Deadput wrote:Actually I don't know my mother's name is Valerie so is Va'al actually my mother?
Yes. Now go to your room and don't play with yourself.
TulioDude wrote:The first three are the Bumblebee statue that was present.Upon close inspection it seems a advanced version of a papercraft, mixed with metal and lights.Its was very well done.
The place was built to resemble a garage with few tools and different models of TVs,as you can see the next three photos.
The other side had few games resembling an arcade with arcade like cabinets (pretty sure one of them was Metal Slug), one pinball machine (a Bumblebee movie themed one) and a stage with people playing Just Dance with some 80’s songs and a few more. There was also some dioramas like the previous one seen in other conventions around, but I did not manage to get more photos of them. An overall view in the next pic.
Of note, one of the highlights was one arcade cabinet with a Bumblebee game, which could be played by up to two players in split screen. I thing this game was seen elsewhere before but I don't remember where. There was also the same in a few smart devices nearby.The next four pics show this. The toy store named ToyMania, was one responsible for selling Transformers merchandise there. It was a selection of the Bumblebee line, Studio series, Cyberverse and miscellaneous ones. If bought anything, you earned the convention exclusive cup, and any if spent more than R$199,00 (Brazil currency remember) in total price, you get the exclusive shirt (i didn't get one). All this seen in the next nine pics. The pin-bottom was the prize for playing the Bumblebee arcade game.
To cap it off one last pics of the tools and one of the outside view.
Return to Transformers Live Action Film Forum
Registered users: Bing [Bot], Gauntlet101010, Glyph, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Google Feedfetcher, MSN [Bot], sprockitz, SupersonicShockwave, Yahoo [Bot], Ziusundra