
Killer work though!
Sorry, but I don't see anything there that suggests the hand retracted at all. In fact, I can't see anything of any real detail period. the quality isn't good enough. When I watched the movie, twice. All it loed to me like is the blade flipped out from his wrist. It didn't replace his hand.Samsonator wrote:untrue, when he retracts it you clearly see the blade slide in and the hand slide back out.Tramp wrote:Prime's hand doesn't get replaced by the sword, the sword simply extends out from the wrist along the back of his hand.
Edit: Here's a couple of screenshots illustrating my point (not the greatest quality, but I use what I have to work with):
Tramp wrote:I've seen the movie twice now, the first time front row center, and the TV spots innumerable times. There is nothing over his optics when the battle mask is down. They are the only parts of his face left exposed.
Tramp wrote:Watch the scene where Bumblebee lifts up the one side of his baattlemask. his optics are unobstructed. What you thoght was a grate was actually just the swift movement blurring the optics.
And, as for Prime, every time I watched that clip, and in the mvoe itself, it just looked to me as if the blade just flipped out lond the back of his hand. That would make more sense to do too, and there is plenty of room for the blade to fit without retracting the hand. Having the hand retract would be not only unnecessary, but also limiting.
Tramp wrote:Watch the scene where Bumblebee lifts up the one side of his baattlemask. his optics are unobstructed. What you thoght was a grate was actually just the swift movement blurring the optics.
Tramp wrote:They didn't remove it, but I am sure they modified it, getting rid of your "grating". As I said, all the shots I've seen show unobstructed optics.
MisterNewUzer wrote:Tramp wrote:They didn't remove it, but I am sure they modified it, getting rid of your "grating". As I said, all the shots I've seen show unobstructed optics.
Sorry duder, but Jin's right. I've got a [really good] bootleg of the movie and I just watched both scenes with the battle mask about 10 times each. The "grating" is more like 3 or 4 bars that come across his optics. In the scene after he topples Brawl, the bars are seen retracting quickly as BB is lifting up his mask. Maybe it is you who should go back and look again? heh![]()
Way to introduce myself to the forums right?haha, Hey guys, I'm new!
sdefedder wrote:Ratchet is yellow, not green like this...
Tramp wrote:Sonray is correct on this. movie rathcet is florescent "Dayglow" green. Many ambulances use the same color as detailing because it reflects light better than red making it more visble at night when struck by headlights.
Sonray wrote:Tramp wrote:Sonray is correct on this. movie rathcet is florescent "Dayglow" green. Many ambulances use the same color as detailing because it reflects light better than red making it more visble at night when struck by headlights.
I think its funny how so many people complain about this version of ratchet (both the toy and the movie render) as being unrealistic or not ambulance-y enough because of its color, yet EVERY ambulance i see is colored this way.
Where do these people live?? lol
sdefedder wrote:Sonray wrote:Tramp wrote:Sonray is correct on this. movie rathcet is florescent "Dayglow" green. Many ambulances use the same color as detailing because it reflects light better than red making it more visble at night when struck by headlights.
I think its funny how so many people complain about this version of ratchet (both the toy and the movie render) as being unrealistic or not ambulance-y enough because of its color, yet EVERY ambulance i see is colored this way.
Where do these people live?? lol
Sorry we don't all live in America. Just thought he said Movie accurate. And around face needs to be darker. Part from the coloring its Good. Looked at stills too, more yellow needed
RATCHET
Registered users: 2crudedudes, Bing [Bot], blokefish, FireRoad, Glyph, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Google Feedfetcher, MSN [Bot], Yahoo [Bot]