>
>
>

Kusanagi vs Excalibur

Got a crazy idea of a fantasy battle? Want to know if Unicron would defeat the Death Star? Debate your favorite fantasy battles here!

Kusanagi vs Excalibur

Postby Master Shake » Sun Feb 18, 2007 1:31 am

Master Shake
Minibot
Posts: 189
Joined: Sun Aug 17, 2003 10:53 am

Postby Greed » Sun Feb 18, 2007 1:37 am

Considering they are swords I'm going to say neither because they are inanimate objects but I like Excalibur better.
Greed
Transmetal Warrior
Posts: 804
Joined: Thu Apr 08, 2004 10:08 pm

Postby Evank_Horizon » Sun Feb 18, 2007 2:22 pm

Hmmm.. why didn't you take Masamune or Murasame? They're more famous and well known swords.

Well anyway no mather how magical Excalibur is any good katana weilded by a suitable samurai could probably beat it. I think occidental two-bladed swords are barabarian and slugish. Not to mention oriental mentality pushes toward techique, training and perfection. Also the samurai has the same level of armor protection with more flexibility.

I say Kusanagi wins.
Image
Evank_Horizon
Vehicon
Posts: 385
Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2006 8:58 pm

Postby Big_yellow_glasses » Sun Feb 18, 2007 8:45 pm

I say Excalibur wins this one, I believe that any sword that can unite a kingdom by simply having someone pick it up is capable of destroying anything.
Big_yellow_glasses
Minibot
Posts: 195
Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2007 1:20 pm

Postby Tifereth » Sun Feb 18, 2007 8:50 pm

Evank_Horizon wrote:Hmmm.. why didn't you take Masamune or Murasame? They're more famous and well known swords.

Well anyway no mather how magical Excalibur is any good katana weilded by a suitable samurai could probably beat it. I think occidental two-bladed swords are barabarian and slugish. Not to mention oriental mentality pushes toward techique, training and perfection. Also the samurai has the same level of armor protection with more flexibility.

I say Kusanagi wins.


agree ;)
Image
Vergil ;).
Tifereth
Godmaster
Posts: 1705
Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 2:14 pm
Location: Neither the heaven, nor the hell.

Postby AutobotGeneral » Mon Feb 19, 2007 1:49 am

Go watch MythBusters. The Longsword Wins.
AutobotGeneral
Minibot
Posts: 114
Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2003 5:09 pm

Postby DesalationReborn » Tue Feb 20, 2007 1:03 am

AutobotGeneral wrote:Go watch MythBusters. The Longsword Wins.


Agreed. Any armor from Europe was severely more vamped than from mineral-starved Japan (who used seashells and hardened leather for most of their history), and the swords were built to match that. If the blades meet, the longsword would likely shatter the other, and the European would likely win just because he's more protected, if he doesn't collapse from 70 pounds of steel armor first.
Image
DesalationReborn
Gestalt Team Leader
Posts: 968
Joined: Sat May 22, 2004 9:29 pm

Re: Kusanagi vs Excalibur

Postby snavej » Fri Sep 29, 2023 6:40 am

Motto: "Follow your instincts and your common sense."
Excalibur, if it existed, was forged in the early part of the Iron Age. Carbon was added somehow, making Excalibur carbon steel. Consequently, it was much stronger than other swords of the time. It helped the wielder kill more enemies and win battles. I heard a legend that King Arthur once personally killed over four hundred enemies in a single battle. He not only had the best sword but also he was the best swordsman back then.

I'm guessing that Excalibur would've shattered the little Jap blade.
snavej
Gestalt
Posts: 2906
Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2005 12:24 pm
Location: United Kingdom
Alt Mode: Small starship - able to traverse entire universe.
Strength: 8
Intelligence: 9
Speed: 3
Endurance: 3
Rank: 2
Courage: 9
Skill: 8


Return to Fantasy Battles

Patreon
Charge Our Energon Reserves. Join the Seibertron Elite.
Support SEIBERTRON™