Seibertron.com Energon Pub Forums

by **zenosaurus_x** » Thu Oct 21, 2010 5:37 pm

Burn wrote:
Autobot032 wrote:...this is why we can't have nice things. You know that, right?

But ... but ... we're entitled, no ... we DESERVE nice things! They owe us! THEY OWE USSSSSSSS!!!!!!

After ALL of our HARD WORK TOO!!!

Anyhow, comedy is fine, but on a serious note it's just the way it was executed sometimes that bugs me alot.

Because, I, as the true fan here, obviously know what everyone wants and it is thus my solemn duty to decide FOR THEM...

I didn't go too far there did I?

News Credits: 22 · by **Rodimus Prime** » Thu Oct 21, 2010 7:49 pm

zenosaurus_x wrote:I didn't go too far there did I?

You're a true fan. There's no such thing as going too far. GeeWunners are teh WIN!!!

:twisted:

by **SEXFIGHTER** » Fri Oct 22, 2010 3:05 am

im not baiting people in person or directly, if anything im baiting Michael Bay. Anyway, did you know i didnt like ROTF?

by **SEXFIGHTER** » Fri Oct 22, 2010 3:08 am

zenosaurus_x wrote:
Burn wrote:
Autobot032 wrote:...this is why we can't have nice things. You know that, right?

But ... but ... we're entitled, no ... we DESERVE nice things! They owe us! THEY OWE USSSSSSSS!!!!!!

After ALL of our HARD WORK TOO!!!

Anyhow, comedy is fine, but on a serious note it's just the way it was executed sometimes that bugs me alot.

Because, I, as the true fan here, obviously know what everyone wants and it is thus my solemn duty to decide FOR THEM...

I didn't go too far there did I?

What you want is more rubbish films, so thank god you don't decide for any of us. For you they are somehow deep and meaningful...you're a Bay fan, not a Transformers fan.

News Credits: 668 · by **Autobot032** » Fri Oct 22, 2010 3:21 am

SEXFIGHTER wrote:
zenosaurus_x wrote:
Burn wrote:
Autobot032 wrote:...this is why we can't have nice things. You know that, right?

But ... but ... we're entitled, no ... we DESERVE nice things! They owe us! THEY OWE USSSSSSSS!!!!!!

After ALL of our HARD WORK TOO!!!

Anyhow, comedy is fine, but on a serious note it's just the way it was executed sometimes that bugs me alot.

Because, I, as the true fan here, obviously know what everyone wants and it is thus my solemn duty to decide FOR THEM...

I didn't go too far there did I?

What you want is more rubbish films, so thank god you don't decide for any of us. For you they are somehow deep and meaningful...you're a Bay fan, not a Transformers fan.

Okay, now you're getting out of hand.

He was joking and you're just looking for a fight. Cut it out or I'm reporting you.

he only person not having fun here is you. The rest of us are being sarcastic and using exaggeration in our posts. If you can't get that figured out, that's one thing. You're choosing not to, however.

You're the one baiting and it's getting tiresome. No one's going to fight with you, so you might as well give up.

SEXFIGHTER wrote:im not baiting people in person or directly, if anything im baiting Michael Bay. Anyway, did you know i didnt like ROTF?

...baiting Bay? Are you serious? THE MAN WON'T EVEN READ THIS! YOU'RE WASTING YOUR TIME!

No, you're baiting us under the pitiful guise of...whatever it is you're tying to use here.

And no one cares whether or not you liked the movie. When you took a joke and started using it to attack people, you crossed a line and your opinion became worthless to me and others.

Next one, I'm reporting.

by **SEXFIGHTER** » Fri Oct 22, 2010 3:30 am

SlyTF1 wrote:
SEXFIGHTER wrote:Once again the grown up ROTF fans are overcompensating for a tank of a ballbag of a movie by rounding up on those who don't like ROTF..even moderaters are directly baiting here, and getting away with it. sad forum.

Once again the ROTF haters are accusing others for insults.

Probably because its there to see. Why, if we dont like ROTF are we dismissed as ROTF HATERS...like we're the klu klux klan or something? That was a terrible, terrible film, it really is..and rather than speak out and tell them how bad it was, you'd sooner lap it up cos its got a few explosions and tell them you want more. I really do hope the 3rd is an improvement, i'll happily eat my words, Shockwaves a fave of mine...but with this team of people behind the wheel, it could go right over the cliff.... cue explosion.

by **SEXFIGHTER** » Fri Oct 22, 2010 3:36 am

the ROTF mafia can make insults and cross lines but i cant defend myself? are you for real? go report me then, very childish.

by **SEXFIGHTER** » Fri Oct 22, 2010 3:42 am

Autobot032 wrote:
SEXFIGHTER wrote:
zenosaurus_x wrote:
Burn wrote:
Autobot032 wrote:...this is why we can't have nice things. You know that, right?

But ... but ... we're entitled, no ... we DESERVE nice things! They owe us! THEY OWE USSSSSSSS!!!!!!

After ALL of our HARD WORK TOO!!!

Anyhow, comedy is fine, but on a serious note it's just the way it was executed sometimes that bugs me alot.

Because, I, as the true fan here, obviously know what everyone wants and it is thus my solemn duty to decide FOR THEM...

I didn't go too far there did I?

What you want is more rubbish films, so thank god you don't decide for any of us. For you they are somehow deep and meaningful...you're a Bay fan, not a Transformers fan.

Okay, now you're getting out of hand.

He was joking and you're just looking for a fight. Cut it out or I'm reporting you.

he only person not having fun here is you. The rest of us are being sarcastic and using exaggeration in our posts. If you can't get that figured out, that's one thing. You're choosing not to, however.

You're the one baiting and it's getting tiresome. No one's going to fight with you, so you might as well give up.

SEXFIGHTER wrote:im not baiting people in person or directly, if anything im baiting Michael Bay. Anyway, did you know i didnt like ROTF?

...baiting Bay? Are you serious? THE MAN WON'T EVEN READ THIS! YOU'RE WASTING YOUR TIME!

No, you're baiting us under the pitiful guise of...whatever it is you're tying to use here.

And no one cares whether or not you liked the movie. When you took a joke and started using it to attack people, you crossed a line and your opinion became worthless to me and others.

Next one, I'm reporting.

....You're a grown man and you're talkin like we're in pre school and i stole a pencil...im entitled to defend myself, sameway you're entitled to defend your friends.

News Credits: 226 · by **Burn** » Fri Oct 22, 2010 4:10 am

Sexfighter, up until YOU weighed in NO ONE had made ANY comments directed AT YOU.

We were all just having a little bit of fun, absoloutely NOTHING derogatory was said, NO RULES were broken.

But if you feel that you have been personally vicitimised or that we went over board, then go ahead and file a complaint. I'll even pm Cyber Bishop and Counterpunch to make sure they see it and let them deal with it.

Or, you could just accept that we've had to put up with what you and many others have been ranting and raving like a broken record for years and suck it up and get over it.

by **SEXFIGHTER** » Fri Oct 22, 2010 4:13 am

Burn wrote:Sexfighter, up until YOU weighed in NO ONE had made ANY comments directed AT YOU.

We were all just having a little bit of fun, absoloutely NOTHING derogatory was said, NO RULES were broken.

But if you feel that you have been personally vicitimised or that we went over board, then go ahead and file a complaint. I'll even pm Cyber Bishop and Counterpunch to make sure they see it and let them deal with it.

Or, you could just accept that we've had to put up with what you and many others have been ranting and raving like a broken record for years and suck it up and get over it.

i don't do snitching. i'm a grown man.

News Credits: 226 · by **Burn** » Fri Oct 22, 2010 4:18 am

Then get over it.

Like I said, we've put up with your broken record rantings, and from others like you. We put up with you, the least you can do is put up with us.

Sound fair?

by **SEXFIGHTER** » Fri Oct 22, 2010 4:22 am

Burn wrote:Then get over it.

Like I said, we've put up with your broken record rantings, and from others like you. We put up with you, the least you can do is put up with us.

Sound fair?

fair enough...i see your point.

News Credits: 194 · by **RodimusConvoy13** » Fri Oct 22, 2010 6:04 am

Seibertronian Albershide let us know about an article on IGN with Lorenzo Di Bonavetura discussing the use of 3D technology and the type of humor we can expect in the Transformers 3. He also says there will be more action scenes.

"According to di Bonaventura, director Michael Bay's use of 3D technology this time around will take the franchise to the next level.

"It captures scenes in a way they haven't been captured before and here's a different sensibility to the movie as a result" he explained. "Michael is so awesome at shooting, the question originally was how the cameras would work because they're cumbersome. Look how long it took Jim Cameron to make one movie. All those things are quite daunting, but Michael figured out how to use the cameras in a day.

"We had a day early in pre-production set aside just so he could test the cameras and see what they were like. If you look at Avatar, the camera isn't sweeping around in the way Michael uses the camera, so we had to make sure it could do what Michael does. I think people are going to be pretty wowed by the result."

Aside from the 3D however, what will be different this time around?

"What you can expect is more comedy than we've ever had before" di Bonaventura revealed. "You can expect bigger action sequences than we've ever had before and you can expect a different character through-line for our lead because he's a little bit older and Rosie's a little bit older - there's a maturity there that didn't exist before.

"He's moved on to a new stage in his life with a job, and that's an interesting rite of passage, so I think it has the emotional elements that people are expecting of the movie, but they've moved forward in time, if you would."

Full article:
http://uk.movies.ign.com/articles/112/1129218p1.html

News Credits: 1 · by **Cheetron** » Fri Oct 22, 2010 6:11 am

I snickered at the part about Sam having a job.

"Excuse me boss, I've got to run. Got a world to save!"

"You walk out that door Witwicky and you're fired!"

"It's only my 4th job this month, I hope this emergency is better than the last."

lol

Like GEEWUN on Facebook · by **GEEWUN** » Fri Oct 22, 2010 6:18 am

zenosaurus_x wrote:
"What you can expect is more comedy than we've ever had before"

*Groan...*
Don't get me wrong, I love the movies and they did have SOME funny moments but...ROTF had a few that made me like the movie so much less....

I agree, Glen made me laugh in the 1st film, but humping dogs and humping robots and Devestator Balls o' doom sorta made me wanna barf....

by **Cobalt Prime** » Fri Oct 22, 2010 6:29 am

More action is good-you wont hear me complaining about it as long as the action is actually CLEAR and not the blurry jumbles of silverware we had in previous offerings.

In terms of comedy, I have no problem with it if it is done like it was in the first movie. There were scenes that were actually quite amusing, such as the Autobots "stealthily" stomping around Sam's back yard and quietly bickering, or Ratchet throwing out that embarrassing comment about the "boy's pheromone levels". Unfortunately, the cleverness disappeared in ROTF and the comedy came across as juvenile or just plain lame in most cases. I hope this time that the comic relief is more like the former than the latter.

by **RiddlerJ** » Fri Oct 22, 2010 6:30 am

So what people are saying, if I got the gist here, is that EVERYONE pretty much admits that these movies are for children, only children, and that only a child would appreciate it.

Good to know ahead of time, I'll go see something else. Maybe something from Pixar.

News Credits: 1 · by **mattyc1007** » Fri Oct 22, 2010 7:07 am

I rather liked devastators joke, more like that in a serious figth scene I can live with, also with the scorponok scene in 2007 with left cheek, left cheek, left cheek!

"This bad comedy" No cyclonus your bad comedy!

I say yes with comedy and no with haters or those with no humour

News Credits: 1 · by **D-340** » Fri Oct 22, 2010 7:28 am

This is all what they pretty much had said prior to it's release. Ugh :roll:

, I'm bettin' it's gonna be ROTF all over again. Why can't they do a film more along the lines of the first one. Oh well I guess, it'll make huge bank and keep Transformers relevant for years to come. But I got a huge feeling it's gonna be just as bad as ROTF.

by **gothsaurus** » Fri Oct 22, 2010 7:34 am

Ha ha ha. That was totally my concern.... more comedy and explosions... plus more human character development.

Wait, wasn't I coming to see a movie about robots? :???:

News Credits: 1 · by **D-340** » Fri Oct 22, 2010 7:43 am

gothsaurus wrote:Ha ha ha. That was totally my concern.... more comedy and explosions... plus more human character development.

Wait, wasn't I coming to see a movie about robots?

The hell you say! A Transformers actually about the Transformers, pffftt..... who needs that when all the Transformers fans in the world are more concerned with how Sam will handle his new job and his new love interest. It's all about his coming of age story, thought you knew that.

News Credits: 2 · by **First-Aid** » Fri Oct 22, 2010 7:47 am

GEEWUN wrote: ...and Devestator Balls o' doom....

Priceless quote!

gothsaurus wrote:Wait, wasn't I coming to see a movie about robots?

Not really. Even in the beginning of G1, it was a matter of robots interacting with humans by accidentally bringing a war to the planet.

D-340 wrote: Oh well I guess, it'll make huge bank and keep Transformers relevant for years to come. But I got a huge feeling it's gonna be just as bad as ROTF.

See bold text above. For us as fans this is all we should be concerned about. Personally, I like the diversity of the multiple universes and timelines- keeps it from getting boring and repetitive- but I would hate to see Transformers cease to exist.

RiddlerJ wrote:Good to know ahead of time, I'll go see something else. Maybe something from Pixar.

Wow...you are a masochist.

Cobalt Prime wrote:More action is good-you wont hear me complaining about it as long as the action is actually CLEAR and not the blurry jumbles of silverware we had in previous offerings.

Two words: forest fight. Nuff said.

News Credits: 11 · by **kirbenvost** » Fri Oct 22, 2010 8:57 am

Autobot032 wrote:
Burn wrote:
Autobot032 wrote:...this is why we can't have nice things. You know that, right?

But ... but ... we're entitled, no ... we DESERVE nice things! They owe us! THEY OWE USSSSSSSS!!!!!!

Of course they do! We're like 90% of their revenue, and we're their main focus! Kids are merely an afterthought.

Remember folks, the box says "For Ages 30 And Up", I mean, it's not rocket surgery here...TransFormers aren't for kids, silly rabbit!

Geez. You'd think people would figure out that it's ALL about US!

US!

US.

But...I'm only 26. :-(

Cheetron wrote:I snickered at the part about Sam having a job.

"Excuse me boss, I've got to run. Got a world to save!"

"You walk out that door Witwicky and you're fired!"

"It's only my 4th job this month, I hope this emergency is better than the last."

lol

Wait, you forgot a couple lines!

Boss: "Dammit! I warned you Witwicky!! You're FIRED!"

Sam, running away: "Nonononononononononononono..."

by **Prankmeister** » Fri Oct 22, 2010 9:22 am

First-Aid wrote:
RiddlerJ wrote:Good to know ahead of time, I'll go see something else. Maybe something from Pixar.

Wow...you are a masochist.

Are you implying here that Pixar makes bad movies?

Because them's fightin' words.

by **zenosaurus_x** » Fri Oct 22, 2010 10:00 am

GEEWUN wrote:
zenosaurus_x wrote:
"What you can expect is more comedy than we've ever had before"

*Groan...*
Don't get me wrong, I love the movies and they did have SOME funny moments but...ROTF had a few that made me like the movie so much less....

I agree, Glen made me laugh in the 1st film, but humping dogs and humping robots and Devestator Balls o' doom sorta made me wanna barf....

The dogs scene was just....a waste of effort, life, and film...Devastator was just weird...
Glenn was actually funny at least and now I hear(well from long ago) that LEO gets a larger role?

I really didn't like Leo >_>

What you want is more rubbish films, so thank god you don't decide for any of us. For you they are somehow deep and meaningful...you're a Bay fan, not a Transformers fan.

As Burn said, it was a joke. I don't even see how you could think that was a serious sentence.