Post a reply

Dear Jack

Username:

Subject:

{ CONFIRMATION }

What color is Autobot Bumblebee?: This question is a means of identifying and preventing automated submissions.

[quote="Jack Hallows"][quote="Absolute Zero"]Go ahead, TL;DR it.[/quote] 
why would i? i asked for something and you attempted to provide it, of course i’m going to give it the time it deserves. i do advocate for civility, after all.

[quote="Absolute Zero"]
The same loophole in the rules you cited about the alt modes, which wasn't against the rules. [/quote]
if you look at the two, they are completely different.

what i am doing, level sitting, is not an unfair advantage. any and every player is fully capable of level sitting. the question is if they want to or not, as most times they do not. the extra experience offers no “unfair” advantage. unfair about what? the fact that you played more than someone else?

[url=https://www.seibertron.com/energonpub/is-there-anyone-out-there-that-is-a-level-0--t87637.php#p1396643]Discharge has had a level 0 Con for longer than HallowJack’s been a level 7;[/url] with all the talk of how much level 0 sucks and how people should level, i haven’t seen anyone go at him for having the highest level 0 in the game at over 300k experience points. personal note: i have no problem with what Discharge is doing, but it’s being used as a point of reference. there are Autobots with personal goals of beating his level 0 high score, so that’s cool.

also, no one is having a go at [url=https://www.seibertron.com/heavymetalwar/team_view.php?id=20726]Redimus[/url] for constantly reformatting his high levels to level 2 when it suits their faction event goals.

by contrast, my Kup character (who is the product of an alt hunt, and thus can’t be reformatted) got called out for being a level 3 with 3 million xp, all of which Kup earned while being level 3. i listened to people’s personal complaints about it and leveled him after making sure the other low level Autobots wouldn’t be constantly smashed in missions. i do try to be civil.

[quote]In case you were wondering, there is also an exploit to avoid the level cap. Then again, you alt/wife/whatever seems to be exploiting that[/quote]
she’s no one who concerns you. this is between you and i. also, that exploit you’re referring to is one that was brought to light [b]this year[/b]. and do you know how? just like the alt exploit, your rdd mates came here doing it; targeting players who are allies of mine. [b]this is indisputable[/b]. so you can chalk that up to a new player fighting fire with fire in order to stand a chance.

also, it’s famously clear that i don’t know much about the mechanical aspects of HMW. it wasn’t until the alt exploit was exposed that actual conversation about the inner workings of HMW became public... at least in recent times.

anyway, level sitting is drastically different from the alt exploit. there is [u][b]explicit language[/b][/u] prohibiting the alt exploit, 
[quote]SECTION 4 - HMW Game Rules
PARTS
- Exploiting a glitch or loop hole in the game's programming to take any action that is not within the normal parameters of game play.[/quote]
it’s natural for the alts to roll over and you pick some newness. it’s not natural to make the [b]action[/b] of copying and pasting links to get new things not available regularly. which is exactly what happened.

also, if any player is able to the the job of the moderator, it makes their role obsolete and takes [i]guaranteed traffic[/i] (alt hunts) away from the forums.

level sitting is not “unfair” (it’s not a secret action, everyone can do it) and it’s not taking an unnatural action. it’s staying still.

[quote]simply sitting on the XP would still level you up.[/quote]
show me a link or a post of this being explicitly stated. that is the objective proof i’m asking for. the same that i always provide. otherwise it looks like you’re just singling me out out of anger and holding me to a standard you won’t hold others to; explicitly, your tagmates, since every con is rdd.

[quote]Ignorance of the rules does not make you innocent of violating them. Though we also have some evidence of willful violation.[/quote]
now you’re trying to be pushy. like i stated in my last post: as of 2018, this month to be exact, it’s been posted that it’s not cheating. so there’s no “willful violation” of anything.

please note that i might not be responding to this thread until this event phase is finished. it’s getting down to the wire and i don’t need distractions.[/quote]