Bonger wrote:But why would this be the only instance where the cartoon consistently labeled a bot with the wrong name?
Someone will correct me if wrong, but there is a story that, unsure the toys would sell, they were told to give him one bot's colours and the other's name, therefore making kids want both.
Bonger wrote:However, in the toy line, they confused Rumble and Frenzy's names on the packaging just as they confused the tech specs for Skywarp and Starscream.
If that was true, if the packaging was mixed up and the bibles that the fiction used were right, why was comic Rumble red?
Also, as well as mixing up Starscream and Skywarps tech's, it's believed that Sideswipe and Sunstreaker got mixed tech's too, but we don't call them the opposite names because the techs were taken as canon, so why should Rumble and Frenzy be any different?
Rumble is red, G1 cartoon Rumble is blue. It's that simple.
Phenotype wrote:I don't even understand how this is an issue, all you have to ask yourselves is which came first?
Which came first, toy Bumblebee or cartoon Bumblebee?
Brawn? Ratchet? Ironhide?
The toy every time, but it is the cartoon versions that everyone considers the defining proper versions, with their human bodies and faces.
So you can see why people will credit the show and treat it as the defining version.
However, these things were dominant in ALL G1 fiction, blue Rumble was not, he's like blue helmet Megatron from the comic; like that since day one, but only in one format.
Not enough to define it in all aspects.
Unless Hasbro wanted to, which they didn't.