Transformers and More @ The Seibertron Store

Details subject to change. See listing for latest price and availability.
robofreak wrote:Let's try to keep the politics out of this as much as possible. I don't want an argument to ensue here.
Henry921 wrote:You can always be counted on to listen to reason, Pryme.
Dead Metal wrote:Have you ever, and i mean ever seen/read/heard something that is completely original and does not copy/homage/pay tribute to something else? Here's a hint: Nope. You never have and you never will.
deathy wrote:
(1) in the 2010 thru 2011 TF toy year hasbro didn't cut back & release less bigger sized toy.
The PCC 5-pack gestalts & $29.99 HA toys were clearly considered bigger sized TF toys. and count towards the tally number of bigger TF toys released in 2010 thru 2011.
(2)I highly doubt Hasbro/takara has cancelled future plans to release decepticons toys in the leader size classes.
(3)I see no evidence of hasbro making the Dotm toys smaller than previous years. (1)basics size classs range in robot height from 3 1/3 to 4.5 inches. (2)deluxes size class range in robot height from 4 3/4 inches to 6 inches. (3)voyagers size class range in height from 5 3/4 inches to 7 1/4 inches in height.
Henry921 wrote:You can always be counted on to listen to reason, Pryme.
Dead Metal wrote:Have you ever, and i mean ever seen/read/heard something that is completely original and does not copy/homage/pay tribute to something else? Here's a hint: Nope. You never have and you never will.
deathy wrote:MagnusPrimal wrote:I say go for it. Even if the price goes up a few dollars. The US economy really needs some manufacturing jobs to return to this country.
What if the higher prices force hasbro to get rid of the bigger scaled TF toys like leaders,supreme & ultra's.
What if the higher prices force Hasbro to limit the number of new mold TF toys made per year or get rid of the sub lines?
would you still be for it?
Burn wrote:robofreak doesn't joke. He's all about the serious business of the internet.
ItIsHim wrote:My closet is filled to the brim with plastic children's toys. For myself
robofreak wrote:I did not take the UK into account for this, but after thinking about it for a while, I may have a solution.
Burn wrote:robofreak wrote:I did not take the UK into account for this, but after thinking about it for a while, I may have a solution.
Did you take ANY other markets into account at all?
Burn wrote:robofreak doesn't joke. He's all about the serious business of the internet.
ItIsHim wrote:My closet is filled to the brim with plastic children's toys. For myself
robofreak wrote:I did not take the UK into account for this, but after thinking about it for a while, I may have a solution.
The UK branch will still handle production however it deems fit whether they continue to produce in China or not, that is to future speculation.
The US market is the main one being affected here since production of the US versions will now be in the US.
Takara will still do it's own thing with how their makes their stuff.
The big things that will change now is that more molds will be produced. 1 set will be owned by Takara and the other will be owned by Hasbro for the US factories.
This might also bring costs down for the UK because they won't see higher prices from US made transformers being imported, Hasbro would not have to do much to drive costs down in the US and with product now made for the UK, they would be able to produce it accordingly in order to price things out for the UK market better.
I don't know if I made sense with that, but I tried.
Even with the move out of China for production, Hasbro and Takara would still work together to create all the shows and characters, toys, etc.
Burn wrote:robofreak doesn't joke. He's all about the serious business of the internet.
ItIsHim wrote:My closet is filled to the brim with plastic children's toys. For myself
Burn wrote:If that's the case then why do we hear about molds reaching a point they can no longer be used?
If it's a computer generated image then surely they'd be able to remake the mold and keep churning out older figures yeah?
Burn wrote:robofreak doesn't joke. He's all about the serious business of the internet.
ItIsHim wrote:My closet is filled to the brim with plastic children's toys. For myself
robofreak wrote:Burn wrote:If that's the case then why do we hear about molds reaching a point they can no longer be used?
If it's a computer generated image then surely they'd be able to remake the mold and keep churning out older figures yeah?
They could make a new mold after one dies, but it's a cost decision.
it's like $10,000 just to make one set of molds for a figure.Then to have it be cost effective, they need to get at least 4 repaints out if it.
Burn wrote:robofreak doesn't joke. He's all about the serious business of the internet.
ItIsHim wrote:My closet is filled to the brim with plastic children's toys. For myself
robofreak wrote:I want these sources too because this is throwing everything I know about injection molding into question and seeing the process firsthand tells me there is no such thing as a master mold.
A mold is simply a mold that a created from a Master copy of whaever it is they want to make. And yes, it can be a computer generated image. Ask Hoosierdaddy. We had this conversation a while ago and if I could remember the thread, I would point you to it.
Also, if you are so knowledgeable about molds then you would know that molds aren't just made of some typoe of strong metal. They are steel.
Anyways, let's go back to the topic at hand please.
Henry921 wrote:You can always be counted on to listen to reason, Pryme.
Dead Metal wrote:Have you ever, and i mean ever seen/read/heard something that is completely original and does not copy/homage/pay tribute to something else? Here's a hint: Nope. You never have and you never will.
Return to Transformers Toys Discussion
Registered users: Apple [Bot], Bing [Bot], ChatGPT [Bot], Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], MSN [Bot], OpenAI [Bot], Yahoo [Bot], Yandex [Bot]