Transformers and More @ The Seibertron Store









Details subject to change. See listing for latest price and availability.
Lapse Of Reason wrote:
Most importantly, eBay is soon changing the feedback system. Sellers will only be able to leave a buyer a positive. If the buyer does not pay, the course of action for sellers is to file a non-paying bidder report. After so many, buyers will be warned or have their account closed.
Sellers can receive negative feedback for poor service, and feedback retaliation will soon be a thing of the past.
eBay will also only count feedback within the past year as part of the feedback rating. To help out sellers, they will be including free gallery images and lower listing fees.
Things are changing at eBay to help prevent this type of thing.
Professor Smooth wrote:Most good sellers don't withhold feedback so they can bully buyers into leaving a positive. Most due it to have some defense against the buyers who say, "I got my item, but if you don't refund me half of the price, I'm going to neg you."
... If I sell a 500 dollar item on Ebay, 99 times out of 100 it gets to the person, they leave me positive feedback, that's the end of the transaction. If I send out a 12 dollar item, I get 8 emails wanting to know where the item is (after 2 days) and a "you didn't say that the card was punched, I want you to refund me the cost of the item or I'm leaving you negative feedback!"
Bah.
Professor Smooth wrote:He demanded that I ship the item to him again once I received it. As you may know, shipping from Japan is bloody expensive. He'd won the item with the opening bid and re-shipping it to him would mean that my profit on the sale was negative several dollars. I wasn't going to do that. I told him I'd ship it back to him if he paid for shipping again. He refused, did a paypal claim, got his money back.
Counterpunch wrote:PayPal resolution will crush that bitch.
Use it.
Don't hold back either, you need to call PayPal and demand a service rep to get a proper response.
Also, as a point of disucssion, when money is involved, compassion is for poor people. If you like your money and you want to convert it into goods and/or services, you do not play the nice guy.
Seriously.
Omega-1 wrote:Professor Smooth wrote:He demanded that I ship the item to him again once I received it. As you may know, shipping from Japan is bloody expensive. He'd won the item with the opening bid and re-shipping it to him would mean that my profit on the sale was negative several dollars. I wasn't going to do that. I told him I'd ship it back to him if he paid for shipping again. He refused, did a paypal claim, got his money back.
Sorry if I'm not understanding your story correctly, but I don't see how that's unfair. He paid for his item and he didn't get it so I don't see why he shouldn't get his money back. You got your item, which you can re-list.
Lapse Of Reason wrote:Omega-1 wrote:Professor Smooth wrote:He demanded that I ship the item to him again once I received it. As you may know, shipping from Japan is bloody expensive. He'd won the item with the opening bid and re-shipping it to him would mean that my profit on the sale was negative several dollars. I wasn't going to do that. I told him I'd ship it back to him if he paid for shipping again. He refused, did a paypal claim, got his money back.
Sorry if I'm not understanding your story correctly, but I don't see how that's unfair. He paid for his item and he didn't get it so I don't see why he shouldn't get his money back. You got your item, which you can re-list.
The buyer gave the wrong address. The seller has to pay for return shipping, then to pay to ship it out again? Hardly fair. I'd charge the buyer to ship it again too, or refund the amount paid less the shipping expenses incurred.
Omega-1 wrote:
I wasn't talking about what the buyer asked for but about the Paypal resolution. If the item is not to be re-shipped, then shouldn't the buyer get his money back? I don't think the seller should get to keep the money and the product. As the having to pay to have it shipped back, I didn't know the seller had to pay for that. Perhaps a more fair resolution would have been to make the buyer pay for that charge.
Lapse Of Reason wrote:Omega-1 wrote:Bottom line - the buyer made an error and it cost the seller money.
Omega-1 wrote:Lapse Of Reason wrote:Omega-1 wrote:Bottom line - the buyer made an error and it cost the seller money.
That really depends on the policy of the seller. If he had a policy then maybe Paypal would have rewarded him the shipping cost. Is that not how it works offline?
Lapse Of Reason wrote:Policy or not (I tend to dislike long disclaimers that cover every minute detail of a transaction or user agreement or whatever), if I personally sell something to someone, and they give the wrong address, I'm not going to be happy about having to pay to reship it. It is rather presumptious of the buyer to expect the seller to shell out the money to reship when the mistake was the buyer's fault. The buyer should acknowledge the error and accept the responsibly. It seemed that in this case, the "it's all about me" mentality reared its ugly head. The shame is that PayPal decides on the buyer's behalf without regard to the seller's loss.
If any of this was the seller's mistake, I would think differently.
Return to Transformers Toys Discussion
Registered users: Apple [Bot], Bing [Bot], ChatGPT [Bot], Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], MSN [Bot], OpenAI [Bot], Yahoo [Bot], Yandex [Bot]