The Energon Pub

News Credits: 6188 · by **Va'al** » Sun Mar 08, 2015 9:55 am

After Prowlestator, we have Prowlinger.

I can get behind that.

EDIT: Even better, Pröwlinger.

Like LegendaryAntiHero on Facebook · by **LegendaryAntiHero** » Sun Mar 08, 2015 2:09 pm

I would love it if this could merge with Devastator

News Credits: 5 · by **Convoy** » Sun Mar 08, 2015 6:08 pm

Agamemnon wrote:
Sabrblade wrote:Okay, strange thing just happened to me, here. Before typing this post, I hadn't made a post in this thread, nor did I subscribe to it. I had, however, taken a look at it, but nothing more. Yet, just now, I got a new post email alert for this topic like I do for other topics I'm subscribed to. Wha?

I was thinking the same thing. Did this start in the CW thread and get moved? That's my best guess.

I do like the look, but it doesn't feel too CW to me. If this comes out in the RID line, I think I'll get it.

Cobotron wrote:
Agamemnon wrote:I was thinking the same thing. Did this start in the CW thread and get moved? That's my best guess.

That must be it. I got notification from the CW Leader Class thread, which was also moved fro the CW thread.

Va'al wrote:
ZeroWolf wrote:Yeah this was spun out of the combiner wars thread. I think it was moved once someone pointed out it was the prime smokescreen mold

Strange that subscriptions carry on from old thread though..

Behold the magnificent power of the almighty Ultra Super Mega Thread!
You shall henceforth be notified of all posts!
'Til ALL are ONE! :evil:

News Credits: 456 · by **Sabrblade** » Sun Mar 08, 2015 6:46 pm

Va'al wrote:After Prowlestator, we have Prowlinger.

I can get behind that.

EDIT: Even better, Pröwlinger.

When a Prowl and a Howlinger love each other very much...

News Credits: 241 · by **Jelze Bunnycat** » Sun Mar 08, 2015 6:53 pm

Sabrblade wrote:
Va'al wrote:After Prowlestator, we have Prowlinger.

I can get behind that.

EDIT: Even better, Pröwlinger.
When a Prowl and a Howlinger love each other very much...

... it turns rather messy, and not in a good way. :BOOM:

by **shockblast2** » Tue Mar 10, 2015 7:44 am

Looks like Deluxe Beast Hunters Prowl to me. Why did you use a pic of the Legion class figure?

News Credits: 456 · by **Sabrblade** » Tue Mar 10, 2015 7:46 am

shockblast2 wrote:Looks like Beast Hunters Prowl to me.

It's already been found out to be the simplified BH Smokescreen mold with a lightbar added to it.

by **shockblast2** » Tue Mar 10, 2015 7:50 am

Sabrblade wrote:Okay, strange thing just happened to me, here. Before typing this post, I hadn't made a post in this thread, nor did I subscribe to it. I had, however, taken a look at it, but nothing more. Yet, just now, I got a new post email alert for this topic like I do for other topics I'm subscribed to. Wha?

You actually have something set up that notifies you when anyone makes a post to a thread on this site?

by **shockblast2** » Tue Mar 10, 2015 7:51 am

Sabrblade wrote:
shockblast2 wrote:Looks like Beast Hunters Prowl to me.
It's already been found out to be the simplified BH Smokescreen mold with a lightbar added to it.

I figured that was the case. Not sure why anyone looked at this and thought it was CW Prowl. That Starscream is definitely just an unscaled version of the Legends figure as well. They are identical.

News Credits: 241 · by **Jelze Bunnycat** » Tue Mar 10, 2015 8:16 am

shockblast2 wrote:
Sabrblade wrote:
shockblast2 wrote:Looks like Beast Hunters Prowl to me.
It's already been found out to be the simplified BH Smokescreen mold with a lightbar added to it.

I figured that was the case. Not sure why anyone looked at this and thought it was CW Prowl. That Starscream is definitely just an unscaled version of the Legends figure as well. They are identical.

Only in basic transformation. It's been established earlier in this thread that the prototype was for a line of simplified Transformers for 2011, before Prime was expanding into a line of its own. Furthermore, the transformation seems to have been re-used for Gen. Legends Starscream, so what you're looking at is actually the original