Transformers and More @ The Seibertron Store







Details subject to change. See listing for latest price and availability.
victoryconvoy wrote:is galvatrons weakness water in headmasters he was knocked in the water in the north pole and never heard from again and fort max did the same to him in the comics and was never heard from again wtf the guy took baths in lava and cold water kills him![]()
![]()
![]()
Predaprince wrote:I am very thankful to have posters like sto_vo_kor_2000 who is so energetic about improving others' understanding and enjoyment of the TF universe
Stormrider wrote:You often add interesting insights to conversations that makes the fledglings think and challenges even the sharpest minds
T-Macksimus wrote:I consider you and editor to be amongst the most "scholarly" in terms of your knowledge, demeanor and general approach
Rodimus Prime wrote:Galvatron in the comics was just as strong as his cartoon counterpart.
Predaprince wrote:I am very thankful to have posters like sto_vo_kor_2000 who is so energetic about improving others' understanding and enjoyment of the TF universe
Stormrider wrote:You often add interesting insights to conversations that makes the fledglings think and challenges even the sharpest minds
T-Macksimus wrote:I consider you and editor to be amongst the most "scholarly" in terms of your knowledge, demeanor and general approach
sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:Rodimus Prime wrote:Galvatron in the comics was just as strong as his cartoon counterpart.
No.
Now, the Galvatron in question here is Galvatron 2, and how strong he is isint really known.
Rodimus Prime wrote:sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:Rodimus Prime wrote:Galvatron in the comics was just as strong as his cartoon counterpart.
No.
Yes.
He was in a quite a few issues, his strength was demonstrated sufficiently.
Predaprince wrote:I am very thankful to have posters like sto_vo_kor_2000 who is so energetic about improving others' understanding and enjoyment of the TF universe
Stormrider wrote:You often add interesting insights to conversations that makes the fledglings think and challenges even the sharpest minds
T-Macksimus wrote:I consider you and editor to be amongst the most "scholarly" in terms of your knowledge, demeanor and general approach
sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:Rodimus Prime wrote:sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:Rodimus Prime wrote:Galvatron in the comics was just as strong as his cartoon counterpart.
No.
Yes.
Sorry dude but your flat out wrong.
He was in a quite a few issues, his strength was demonstrated sufficiently.
Gal2 had a hand full of appearances, which hardly show cased any strength at all.
5. Moving on to Generation 2, what further plans did you originally have for it beyond the 12 issue arc? Would Jhiaxus still have met his end in issue 12?
Oh yeah. Jhiaxus was only ever meant to be a one-arc character. I continually wanted to shift the focus and scale of the saga, and I didn’t want to keep running with non-toy characters to the extent where Hasbro might kick up a fuss. The next story arc would have been something like ‘Alignment’ turned out to be, though whether I’d have wrapped the Liege Maximo story in the next 12-issue chunk is debatable. I definitely wanted to keep upping the scale and scope of the threat. I do remember having Galvatron very much in mind to be the wild card in whatever happened next.
Rodimus Prime wrote:No, you're mistaken.
Hardly? I'm not sure if we're talking about the same character. I am referring to the one Unicron "plucked" from an alternate time line by Hook, Line and Sinker in the US comics.
I've never read the UK comics nor do I have any desire to.
Any comic citations I have (which are always correct) are from the US Marvel comics.
Predaprince wrote:I am very thankful to have posters like sto_vo_kor_2000 who is so energetic about improving others' understanding and enjoyment of the TF universe
Stormrider wrote:You often add interesting insights to conversations that makes the fledglings think and challenges even the sharpest minds
T-Macksimus wrote:I consider you and editor to be amongst the most "scholarly" in terms of your knowledge, demeanor and general approach
sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:Rodimus Prime wrote:No, you're mistaken.
So thats the totality of your argument??
I provided evidence that backs my case, you have provided nothing but your opinion.
sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:Your facts might be correct, but not the conclusions your drawing from them.
Stormwolf wrote:I'd normally never butt in on a conversation, but I really feel that it would add to the thread
You didn't provide much evidence yourself other then "it happend in the UK comics".
Providing people with issue names, pagescans and links will help. Instead you yourself respond with the same "you are wrong, I am right" answer that Rodimus provided.
Rodimus Prime doesn't have the material available that we have. Most Transformer fans didn't even know that the UK comics existed till this knowledge became available on the internet.
His conclusions based on the material available are as valid as your own.
That's a pretty bold statement, you yourself aren't exactly a legitimate authority to judge if someones conclusions are or aren't correct. I've noticed you doing this a few times in the fantasy battles thread but didn't want to comment about this.
You can't simply pass of your own opinions as being the only right ones.
Predaprince wrote:I am very thankful to have posters like sto_vo_kor_2000 who is so energetic about improving others' understanding and enjoyment of the TF universe
Stormrider wrote:You often add interesting insights to conversations that makes the fledglings think and challenges even the sharpest minds
T-Macksimus wrote:I consider you and editor to be amongst the most "scholarly" in terms of your knowledge, demeanor and general approach
Stormwolf wrote:Okay to get a couple of things clear:
1. Galvatron I does appear to be far stronger then Galvatron II. Though it should be noted that Galvatron II's defeat was after Unicron was destroyed. So he couldn't power up to whatever strength level he desired. Also note that he took a pounding from Unicron.
2. Galvatron I is the Galvatron that initially appeared in the UK comics (Target 2006). Galvatron II is the Galvatron introduced for the US comic (Rhythms of Darkness).
3. Galvatron II was supposed to return in the G2 comics at some point:5. Moving on to Generation 2, what further plans did you originally have for it beyond the 12 issue arc? Would Jhiaxus still have met his end in issue 12?
Oh yeah. Jhiaxus was only ever meant to be a one-arc character. I continually wanted to shift the focus and scale of the saga, and I didn’t want to keep running with non-toy characters to the extent where Hasbro might kick up a fuss. The next story arc would have been something like ‘Alignment’ turned out to be, though whether I’d have wrapped the Liege Maximo story in the next 12-issue chunk is debatable. I definitely wanted to keep upping the scale and scope of the threat. I do remember having Galvatron very much in mind to be the wild card in whatever happened next.
Full interview can be seen here:
http://transfans.co.uk/interviews_furman.php
4. Headmasters Galvatron was deactivated in the ice till Dark Nova restored him as Super Megatron (Battlestars).
In short, Galvatron never really died in any of those stories.
victoryconvoy wrote:guys i know i know but can ether galvatron beat jacob the vampire......but really rod you have to read the uk stuff it's real fun stuff.......and uk is not i repeat not that powerful......also remember in headmasters he was put out in the artic and the comics he was put out when he fell in the frozen lake do you think that maybee its a weaknes he has that puts him in stasis lock cause extreme heat does not seem to affect him what do you guys think
Predaprince wrote:I am very thankful to have posters like sto_vo_kor_2000 who is so energetic about improving others' understanding and enjoyment of the TF universe
Stormrider wrote:You often add interesting insights to conversations that makes the fledglings think and challenges even the sharpest minds
T-Macksimus wrote:I consider you and editor to be amongst the most "scholarly" in terms of your knowledge, demeanor and general approach
sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:victoryconvoy wrote:guys i know i know but can ether galvatron beat jacob the vampire......but really rod you have to read the uk stuff it's real fun stuff.......and uk is not i repeat not that powerful......also remember in headmasters he was put out in the artic and the comics he was put out when he fell in the frozen lake do you think that maybee its a weaknes he has that puts him in stasis lock cause extreme heat does not seem to affect him what do you guys think
As "Stormwolf" and I pointed out, in the US comic, it was intended to bring him back.
We really dont know if the frozen lake really did much damage at all.
GetRightRobot wrote:Ok. wow. I feel like I now know NOTHING about this replacement for Megs. Which is all I ever considered Galvatron to be. No matter who is "right" on this matter, you have all opened a new chapter, for me, in regards to this character. I simply read a funny topic and dropped in. I had no idea this guy had such a history. Thanks for sharing. Truly.
Predaprince wrote:I am very thankful to have posters like sto_vo_kor_2000 who is so energetic about improving others' understanding and enjoyment of the TF universe
Stormrider wrote:You often add interesting insights to conversations that makes the fledglings think and challenges even the sharpest minds
T-Macksimus wrote:I consider you and editor to be amongst the most "scholarly" in terms of your knowledge, demeanor and general approach
GetRightRobot wrote:Thanks for ever deepening state of confusion. HAH!
Predaprince wrote:I am very thankful to have posters like sto_vo_kor_2000 who is so energetic about improving others' understanding and enjoyment of the TF universe
Stormrider wrote:You often add interesting insights to conversations that makes the fledglings think and challenges even the sharpest minds
T-Macksimus wrote:I consider you and editor to be amongst the most "scholarly" in terms of your knowledge, demeanor and general approach
Rodimus Prime wrote:sto_vo_kor,
I have my view of the character and his abilities. Your view may differ from it, and that's the way it is. I don't have to agree with you. You don't have to agree with me, nor can you say I'm wrong. That's why it's called an OPINION. But your arrogant responses of "No" and "Hardly" and stuff like that are not very friendly and will most likely result in the same type response, which you have gotten from me. Point is, you need to learn how to have a conversation in a friendly manner. You may mean well, but some of your posts are downright rude.
Everyone else, thank you for participating. We probably all learned something from sto_vo_kor's vast knowledge.
Predaprince wrote:I am very thankful to have posters like sto_vo_kor_2000 who is so energetic about improving others' understanding and enjoyment of the TF universe
Stormrider wrote:You often add interesting insights to conversations that makes the fledglings think and challenges even the sharpest minds
T-Macksimus wrote:I consider you and editor to be amongst the most "scholarly" in terms of your knowledge, demeanor and general approach
Return to Transformers General Discussion
Registered users: Bing [Bot], blokefish, Glyph, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], MSN [Bot], sprockitz, Ziusundra