Transformers and More @ The Seibertron Store
Details subject to change. See listing for latest price and availability.
Randomhero wrote:Wreckers was a 5 issue story and Ironfist, rotorstorm, pyro, topspin, twin twist died and all their deaths were pointless and not story advancing. The creators even said all those deaths were 100% avoidable and pointless.
Again shitting on a book that set to fail by people saying they didn’t want it from the get go.
Burn wrote:Randomhero wrote:Wreckers was a 5 issue story and Ironfist, rotorstorm, pyro, topspin, twin twist died and all their deaths were pointless and not story advancing. The creators even said all those deaths were 100% avoidable and pointless.
But AGAIN, that was a Transformers centric book.
This is meant to be a crossover, but so far the story has basically revolved around a Visionaries civil war, with guest appearances from Transformers, two of which have been killed and another twisted.Again shitting on a book that set to fail by people saying they didn’t want it from the get go.
I NEVER said I didn't want it from the get go. I was willing, and gave the book a chance.
ZeroWolf wrote:That's surely the point though that burns trying to make. Transformers are just fodder in this story designed to push visionaries. It's like this if it were a slogan "come for the transformers, stay for the visionaries" but it hasn't worked out like that. At least not in my opinion anyway.
Burn wrote:What the heck man? I don't like this series, why do I have to justify that to you?
There is literally NOTHING you can say that will change my mind on this book, so why are you so hell bent on proving my OPINION is wrong?
Randomhero wrote:Becuase your review sucked and was half assed as your claim the comic is.
Randomhero wrote:ZeroWolf wrote:That's surely the point though that burns trying to make. Transformers are just fodder in this story designed to push visionaries. It's like this if it were a slogan "come for the transformers, stay for the visionaries" but it hasn't worked out like that. At least not in my opinion anyway.
And the 1986 movie used the entire 84 cast as canon fodder to push the new 1987 toys. Do you hate that too?
Burn wrote:Randomhero wrote:Becuase your review sucked and was half assed as your claim the comic is.
Let me explain something to you.
I **** know it sucked. It was NEVER meant to be a review. Va'al and ScottyP approached me and asked me if they could use it. I explained to them it wasn't a review, it was not meant to be a review, but they felt it conveyed what they wanted to say and didn't want to have to type up a review of their own.
So after great reluctance on my part (because I knew stupid crap like this would happen) I agreed to let them news it.
Thanks for making me regret that decision. I forgot how wrong it is to have an opinion that differs from others around here.
By all means, if you think you can do better, then feel free to do a series review once issue 5 comes out. If you're interested, contact Va'al about it.
AllNewSuperRobot wrote:But I digress. The main problem with this crossover seems to stem from it's central premise: It shouldn't have been set on present day Cybertron. Visionaries was a post-apocalyptic series. A former technological civilisation rebuilt within a medieval framework. None of that includes Mad Max visuals or a haphazard conceit about magical macguffins on Cybertron. Send a handful of Transformers to Their world, as they used the Arthurian template in Sunbow. That would have worked.
AlphaBass wrote:There's ways to do it.
AllNewSuperRobot wrote:AlphaBass wrote:There's ways to do it.
Agreed. They don't seem to have been thought through in this book however.
ZeroWolf wrote:I think the fact they were redesigned is evidence that they gauged there to be little interest in a old fashioned visionaries series so an attempt to appeal to new fans were made, hence the visionaries got their g2..which has also flopped by the looks, I expect another new series of designs in the new continuity
AllNewSuperRobot wrote:ZeroWolf wrote:I think the fact they were redesigned is evidence that they gauged there to be little interest in a old fashioned visionaries series so an attempt to appeal to new fans were made, hence the visionaries got their g2..which has also flopped by the looks, I expect another new series of designs in the new continuity
If they aren't shelved altogether, as a result of the reaction to this series.
These are all poor examples to support your point and I can explain why I feel so.Randomhero wrote:Rom vs Transformers killed a Magnus and killed a bunch of space knights. Theres a cross over event. Revolutionaries killed razorclaw and in a way Predaking and Bugley. Again, cross over.
Randomhero wrote:Burn wrote:Randomhero wrote:Wreckers was a 5 issue story and Ironfist, rotorstorm, pyro, topspin, twin twist died and all their deaths were pointless and not story advancing. The creators even said all those deaths were 100% avoidable and pointless.
But AGAIN, that was a Transformers centric book.
This is meant to be a crossover, but so far the story has basically revolved around a Visionaries civil war, with guest appearances from Transformers, two of which have been killed and another twisted.Again shitting on a book that set to fail by people saying they didn’t want it from the get go.
I NEVER said I didn't want it from the get go. I was willing, and gave the book a chance.
Rom vs Transformers killed a Magnus and killed a bunch of space knights. Theres a cross over event. Revolutionaries killed razorclaw and in a way Predaking and Bugley. Again, cross over.
Sunstar wrote:Edit: I could quite merrily live with a continuation of the rom transformers universe.
Return to Transformers Cartoons and Comics Forum
Registered users: Bing [Bot], Bumblevivisector, Glyph, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Google Feedfetcher, MSN [Bot], Yahoo [Bot]