The Energon Pub

News Credits: 8 · by **Liege Evilmus** » Fri Oct 05, 2007 7:11 pm

Counterpunch wrote:
Skowl wrote:We all have to learn to live without his exclusive images. But if that means also learning to live without his pompous, trouble-making, childish attitude, then I think we'll all be just fine.

Yea.

I mean,...I'm still here.

Childish attitudes ruin to many good threads.

by **Ultimum Prime** » Sat Oct 06, 2007 4:06 pm

Skowl wrote:We all have to learn to live without his exclusive images. But if that means also learning to live without his pompous, trouble-making, childish attitude, then I think we'll all be just fine.

Reading through all 11 pages of this thread and all the mean spirited comments and trash talk you guys have posted (which would get you all banned in no time under other circumstances - ironic isn't it?), it makes me wonder who's really childish here. Enjoy the pics while they last.

News Credits: 5 · by **Sledge** » Sat Oct 06, 2007 4:09 pm

Who's really childish? That would be the dude acting like a spoiled brat with his photos. And you. But then, you're the same person, aren't you?

News Credits: 767 · by **Dead Metal** » Sat Oct 06, 2007 4:14 pm

Man I would have realy liked to see them imeges, but F it!
I'm not signing up on some Forum just to see crappy pics of a toy I can see in at longest 3 months!

And I'm not signing into a forum that dos not use the internet the way it shuold be used (and I don't mean porn), the internet isabout sharing knowledge, what he does is just being childish and well Hitler-like!

Yes I said it, and I mean it!

by **Ultimum Prime** » Sat Oct 06, 2007 4:15 pm

Wait. You want me banned yet you want to keep using my stuff to promote your site? Make up your mind guys. Either I'm out or I'm in, not both.

Btw, it amazed me that you couldn't get the news right (well, far from being a first here - you guys are known for regularly posting false/incorrect news) the first time around.

Starscream. Not Thundercracker. At least... try to know your stuff?

PS : All images are back on tfans.com.

News Credits: 5 · by **Sledge** » Sat Oct 06, 2007 4:17 pm

Question: why do you take such offence at fellow Transformers fans linking to your review, thus bringing it to far more people's attention than it would otherwise reach?

by **Ultimum Prime** » Sat Oct 06, 2007 4:18 pm

Sledge wrote:Question: why do you take such offence at fellow Transformers fans linking to your review, thus bringing it to far more people's attention than it would otherwise reach?

I don't want sites who banned me to use my stuff. Simple, isn't it? You always have the option of reading the reviews where I want them to be posted.

News Credits: 767 · by **Dead Metal** » Sat Oct 06, 2007 4:19 pm

Ultimum Prime wrote:Wait. You want me banned yet you want to keep my stuff to promote your site? Make up your mind guys. Either I'm out or in, not both.

Btw, it amazed me that you couldn't get the news right (well, far from being a first here - you guys are known for regularly posting false/incorrect news) the first time around.

Starscream. Not Thundercracker. At least... try to know your stuff?

We are referring to its paint-seam!
It looks more like Thundercraker than Starscream, we are not saying that its Thundercracker!

Learn to read man!

Oh and if you find something missspeled in my post, it's not cos I'm stupid, but have dyslexia and write in three different languages!

by **Ultimum Prime** » Sat Oct 06, 2007 4:21 pm

Dead Metal wrote:
We are referring to its paint-seam!
It looks more like Thundercraker than Starscream, we are not saying that its Thundercracker!

Skowl, who first posted the news, pretended it was TC at first, not SS, because he couldn'T believe a TC-decoed SS was possible. He fixed it later.

by **Loki41872** » Sat Oct 06, 2007 4:21 pm

I can feel the love in here today!

News Credits: 5 · by **Sledge** » Sat Oct 06, 2007 4:21 pm

Ultimum Prime wrote:I don't want sites who banned me to use my stuff. Simple, isn't it? You always have the option of reading thr reviews where I want them to be posted.

Which is exactly what was happening when someone started this thread with a link to your review. Rather than thinking "Great! Lots of people are coming to a fairly obscure forum to see my review" you decided to throw your toys out of the pram. Your behaviour is hardly going to be making other forums think "Gee, we were so wrong to ban that guy, he's alright," now is it?

News Credits: 767 · by **Dead Metal** » Sat Oct 06, 2007 4:26 pm

Ultimum Prime wrote:
Dead Metal wrote:
We are referring to its paint-seam!
It looks more like Thundercraker than Starscream, we are not saying that its Thundercracker!

Skowl, who first posted the news, pretended it was TC at first, not SS, because he couldn'T believe a TC-decoed SS was possible. He fixed it later.

Oh OK, I can except that and apologies for my flaming, and that is also what I thoght he was as I first saw the BotCon pics of him.
It is a odd paint app for him.

by **Ultimum Prime** » Sat Oct 06, 2007 4:30 pm

Oh, I certainly don't want to be "reinstated" by the Allspark, tfw2005 (who went as far as banning the lovely SamiWCP - wtf?) and this site. I just came back to explain my point. Because it's really easy to trash talk when the person you're bad mouthing isn't there.

News Credits: 767 · by **Dead Metal** » Sat Oct 06, 2007 4:32 pm

Ultimum Prime wrote:Oh, I certainly don't want to be "reinstated" by the Allspark, tfw2005 (who went as far as banning the lovely SamiWCP - wtf?) and this site. I just came back to explain my point. Because it's really easy to trash talk when the person you're bad mouthing isn't there.

I never said I want you banned, ore reinstated.

I don't even know you, never heard of you, and it's always easy to bad mouthing people on the internet!

by **Ultimum Prime** » Sat Oct 06, 2007 4:35 pm

I have nothing against you either. And nothing against 99.9% of the board members... before I started reading this thread. It quickly showed the real nature of some of the posters.

Btw, I am banned here, I'm just using an alternate ID (a big no-no, I know).

News Credits: 767 · by **Dead Metal** » Sat Oct 06, 2007 4:38 pm

Well maybe you can stay this time round (if you let every one read your review maybe), cos last time a alt Id was used he didn't last 5 mins.

News Credits: 337 · by **Air Commander Starscream** » Sat Oct 06, 2007 4:54 pm

Ultimum Prime wrote:\
Btw, I am banned here, I'm just using an alternate ID (a big no-no, I know).

And you are banned again. Making a new name is a "no-no", but besides that your behavior is still the same. We did not come to this decision overnight, you had plenty of warnings and chances to change your attitude towards others.

News Credits: 665 · by **Skowl** » Sat Oct 06, 2007 5:29 pm

Ultimum Prime wrote:
Dead Metal wrote:
We are referring to its paint-seam!
It looks more like Thundercraker than Starscream, we are not saying that its Thundercracker!

Skowl, who first posted the news, pretended it was TC at first, not SS, because he couldn'T believe a TC-decoed SS was possible. He fixed it later.

Actually, if you had actually read what I posted, I wrote three different versions:

1) At first, I put Thundercracker. I realised it was wrong, and changed the story

2) I changed it to the *possibility* of it being Starscream and that the official identity of the figure was not yet known, since the slides (and videos) Hasbro showed at SDCC showed a greyish/white Starscream.

3) I changed the story again to reflect the fact that, in all likelyhood, it was Starscream.

A mistake was made in the original story and was quickly corrected.

Ultimum Prime wrote:Wait. You want me banned yet you want to keep using my stuff to promote your site? Make up your mind guys. Either I'm out or I'm in, not both.

Why not both? We banned you from the site for your behavior, if you go and post your photos on another open, public forum, we have all the right to link to those images, whether you've been banned here or not. You have the right to the copyright on those photos, which only means we can't host the photos here, but we can link to them if we desire, no rules broken there.

Ultimum Prime wrote:Btw, it amazed me that you couldn't get the news right (well, far from being a first here - you guys are known for regularly posting false/incorrect news) the first time around.

Starscream. Not Thundercracker. At least... try to know your stuff?

As I said before, a mistake was made and was corrected. The news crew members here are incredibly good at what they do, I'd like to see you find more examples of when "we didn't know our stuff"...

But you're gone, banned from most of the major TF sites... You think the problem is with the collective staff of all these sites, but the only common denominator is you. There's a reason you've been banned from just about everywhere, and you coming back here doesn't do much for your cause. That's fine, you'll just keep doing the rounds of the big sites, showing off your photos and bringing your attitude with you until you get banned again, until the day where you have nowhere left to go.

Goodbye again!

by **TaterX** » Sat Oct 06, 2007 9:34 pm

YEAH! Tell 'em Steve Dave. hardy har har har. TX

by **Sportimus Prime** » Sat Oct 06, 2007 9:53 pm

So the drama for a little plastic toy... Oh well...

Only time will tell how much SS will suck or rock.

by **Bumblebee-otch** » Sat Oct 06, 2007 10:24 pm

i like the mold. its a different approach to TFs. i think people's problems with it lie in the fact that they are making these toys cartoon-accurate, whose designs are up to the animators. sometimes, like with the new "the batman" series, it doesn't work. i think those designs, figure and cartoon, suck. however, they work on the TFs. i also like how the G1 TM SS and the animated starscream (ASS?) have similar heads. i am looking forward to seeing these toys in person.

and i think the review guy/deutsch bag needs to get over himself.