Transformers and More @ The Seibertron Store
Details subject to change. See listing for latest price and availability.
Shadowman wrote:My parents always had a policy of "If you want it, earn it." Outside of birthdays or Christmas, if I wanted something, a toy, a game, etc. I had to go out of my way to earn it, either by saving up the money, or by doing large amounts of chores. As a result, I'm a lot more appreciative of my things; when you really work for something, it makes it that much nicer.
So, no, it's not wrong to get a kid a huge toy, as long as they've earned it, or it's their birthday or a gift-giving holiday.
Editor wrote:metaphorge wrote:wmpyr wrote:But I just can't see myself getting my kid a toy close to $50.
Then you're obviously much too selfish to have children. Get a dog instead.
Obviously we should have high standards for our children, but how are we supposed to expect children to meet high standards if we can't be bothered to provide rewards for meeting those standards?
How the hell does high standards translate into material gains?
My parents had quite high standards when compared to many of the parents on kids my age at the time. And regardless of the family income levels my collection was MUCH smaller from a number of my friends at the time.
Did my parents who both worked hard not love or deserve me and my sister because they felt it was more important for us to be fed, clothed, sleep in a nice home, rather than a number of friends I had growing up in single parent situations where they were showered in toys and got away with tons of stuff I wouldn't dare try because they were compensating lack of family, or time, (or in some cases, just not bothering to try because it was easier to cave in to kids demands).
If you want to claim you have high standard and want to pass those to your offspring, you do it by setting rules, being there for them to support them and nurture them. Setting monitary goals for them to reach does nothing but setting a price for their achivements and your love.
If a kid gets an A on a test, it should be because they want to, because they understand it is important, not because a x-box game is on the line.
Shadowman wrote:My parents always had a policy of "If you want it, earn it." Outside of birthdays or Christmas, if I wanted something, a toy, a game, etc. I had to go out of my way to earn it, either by saving up the money, or by doing large amounts of chores. As a result, I'm a lot more appreciative of my things; when you really work for something, it makes it that much nicer.
So, no, it's not wrong to get a kid a huge toy, as long as they've earned it, or it's their birthday or a gift-giving holiday.
Editor wrote:homelessjunkeon wrote:Is that legal?
I don't really have any experience with this, but I suggest you dedicate at least 20-30% of your budget to a thick water based lubricant. Most adults would have trouble accommodating a "ginormous" toy, I suspect a kid would have an even harder time.
You could try buying them a starter set, something that comes with plenty of lube, and toys in several different sizes, so they can start small and work their way up.
I hope that helps.
Dude, He said Fort Max not Nexus Maximus.
metaphorge wrote:Shadowman wrote:My parents always had a policy of "If you want it, earn it." Outside of birthdays or Christmas, if I wanted something, a toy, a game, etc. I had to go out of my way to earn it, either by saving up the money, or by doing large amounts of chores. As a result, I'm a lot more appreciative of my things; when you really work for something, it makes it that much nicer.
So, no, it's not wrong to get a kid a huge toy, as long as they've earned it, or it's their birthday or a gift-giving holiday.
This makes perfect sense to me, and was how I was raised as well.
It did occur to me that part of my initial reaction to the topic poster may be based on differences in cost-of-living. I live in the SF Bay Area, where everything is expensive so my viewpoint is quite skewed. $50 is not very much money here... rent on a 2 bedroom house in Oakland (where I live) can be as much as $1700-$2100 a month, and that's dirt cheap compared to how much rents are in San Francisco proper and the Silicon Valley.
People wrote:zombybunnie: N_V scares me...I no longer wish that my pants transformed
Burn:Anyone notice how much of a boring party pooper N_V is? He doesn't join in the fun, he's spent the last few years with dodgy builds feeding XP to the Autobots, and he sure as heck doesn't spam.
disruptor96: I forgot how insane you were.
Registered users: Bing [Bot], blokefish, Bumblevivisector, Glyph, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Google Feedfetcher, MSN [Bot], muddyjoe, ScottyP, ShadowBlaze, Yahoo [Bot]