Transformers and More @ The Seibertron Store
Details subject to change. See listing for latest price and availability.
Primus C-00 wrote:Well as Bill Hicks said, we could always hide:Lincoln logs in your sock draw
Wigglez wrote:Just remember. The sword is an extension of your arm. Use it as if you're going to karate chop someone with your really long sharp ass hand.
Spoon wrote:This is why we can't have nice things
Also why that other discussion forum was closed.
Shadowman wrote:KILLTRONBOT 9000 wrote:Ahh, the old Gods, the true Gods. Why, even now, as I type, my hammer of Thor pendant is around my neck. My talisman protects me from the Evil Eye and, above all, I have Loki on my side...
...next to whom Zombie Army Raising Super Jesus (Civil War Era) looks positively lame.
And yet, Jesus has followers ranging in the billions. Though that could easily be attributed to the thousands of years of killing in his name. (Which, and most people don't realize this, would never be condoned by J.C.)
Shadowman wrote:
Lincoln Logs are the predecessor to Legos.
They are that awesome.
He's got some pretty far-out powers to go along with them, too, including teleportation, the projection of trippy telepathic visions and illusions, and the ability to groove on the language of 98% of all known species. To uses his powers to the fullest, though, he's gotta be feelin' good vibrations; bad karma can seriously harsh his mellow, y'know?
Senor Hugo wrote:I gotta say, I love the Norse gods. They have been the only other Gods to show me they exist. During an Ostara ritual I was attending, I got the part to call Odin. So, upon saying "Hail Odin," a guy standing off to the side of the ritual blacked out and collapsed.
It was freakin' awesome.
Burn wrote:I'm never clicking any of your links ever again.
Burn wrote:High Command is an arsehat.
Professor Smooth wrote:I honestly did not want this to turn into another "Is Christianity right?" thread. I just wanted an honest answer to how somebody can be said to "sacrifice themselves" if they are able to return from the dead. There is a marked difference between "insulting your religion" and asking questions about it.
As to my calling Christianity "fiction," this is NO different from what Christians (by definition) think of every other religion. If you believe The Bible is the truth, then the Koran, the book of Mormon, etc are all fiction. The same is true of the reverse.
Back on topic, the historical Jesus, was born in March, so this thread is a bit pre-mature.
Oh, and to explain the "false messiah" thing. Read Matthew 1:23 in the New Testament.
Electron wrote:sledge your comments are like a fat chick raping a hot dog, its unpleasent to watch but in the end its gonna happen
Mr O wrote:I'm part Irish, part Scottish, very Welsh, mostly drunk, somewhat Transformers nerd and all bastard.
The Master Blaster wrote:Professor Smooth wrote:I honestly did not want this to turn into another "Is Christianity right?" thread. I just wanted an honest answer to how somebody can be said to "sacrifice themselves" if they are able to return from the dead. There is a marked difference between "insulting your religion" and asking questions about it.
As to my calling Christianity "fiction," this is NO different from what Christians (by definition) think of every other religion. If you believe The Bible is the truth, then the Koran, the book of Mormon, etc are all fiction. The same is true of the reverse.
Back on topic, the historical Jesus, was born in March, so this thread is a bit pre-mature.
Oh, and to explain the "false messiah" thing. Read Matthew 1:23 in the New Testament.
Does this greatly increase my chances of being Christ then?
Some people do consider me holy ya know
Burn wrote:I'm never clicking any of your links ever again.
Burn wrote:High Command is an arsehat.
KILLTRONBOT 9000 wrote:Besides, I reckon that Smooth should be allowed to say what he likes - isn't that the point about freedom of speech and the Second (?) Amendment?
Wigglez wrote:Just remember. The sword is an extension of your arm. Use it as if you're going to karate chop someone with your really long sharp ass hand.
Shadowman wrote:KILLTRONBOT 9000 wrote:Besides, I reckon that Smooth should be allowed to say what he likes - isn't that the point about freedom of speech and the Second (?) Amendment?
1. The second amendment is the one that lets you own guns. Saying what you want is the First Amendment.
2. There's a rule that you can't bash other people's beliefs. Christianity = someone's beliefs. Calling it fiction = bashing.
Burn wrote:I'm never clicking any of your links ever again.
Burn wrote:High Command is an arsehat.
High Command wrote:Shadowman wrote:KILLTRONBOT 9000 wrote:Besides, I reckon that Smooth should be allowed to say what he likes - isn't that the point about freedom of speech and the Second (?) Amendment?
1. The second amendment is the one that lets you own guns. Saying what you want is the First Amendment.
2. There's a rule that you can't bash other people's beliefs. Christianity = someone's beliefs. Calling it fiction = bashing.
Well it's my deeply held belief that the sky-bully god of the bible is a ****. So you'd better not bash my belief.
Wigglez wrote:Just remember. The sword is an extension of your arm. Use it as if you're going to karate chop someone with your really long sharp ass hand.
Shadowman wrote:High Command wrote:Shadowman wrote:KILLTRONBOT 9000 wrote:Besides, I reckon that Smooth should be allowed to say what he likes - isn't that the point about freedom of speech and the Second (?) Amendment?
1. The second amendment is the one that lets you own guns. Saying what you want is the First Amendment.
2. There's a rule that you can't bash other people's beliefs. Christianity = someone's beliefs. Calling it fiction = bashing.
Well it's my deeply held belief that the sky-bully god of the bible is a ****. So you'd better not bash my belief.
I have to disagree. I always saw it like this:
Old Testament God: Liquored-up, pissed off, Sky-bully.
New Testament God: Nicer, forgiving God, with a strict rule of non-intervention.
Burn wrote:I'm never clicking any of your links ever again.
Burn wrote:High Command is an arsehat.
High Command wrote:Shadowman wrote:High Command wrote:Shadowman wrote:KILLTRONBOT 9000 wrote:Besides, I reckon that Smooth should be allowed to say what he likes - isn't that the point about freedom of speech and the Second (?) Amendment?
1. The second amendment is the one that lets you own guns. Saying what you want is the First Amendment.
2. There's a rule that you can't bash other people's beliefs. Christianity = someone's beliefs. Calling it fiction = bashing.
Well it's my deeply held belief that the sky-bully god of the bible is a ****. So you'd better not bash my belief.
I have to disagree. I always saw it like this:
Old Testament God: Liquored-up, pissed off, Sky-bully.
New Testament God: Nicer, forgiving God, with a strict rule of non-intervention.
Except for raping a teenage Jewish virgin girl, getting her pregnant in the process and having some other guy bring up his kid? He didn't even step in to save his bastard kid when he got nailed to a tree. What a ****!
As for forgiveness Richard Dawkins sums it up best:
If God wanted to forgive our sins, why not just forgive them? In any case (one can't help wondering), who was God trying to impress [with the crucifixion of Jesus]? Presumably himself - judge and jury as well as execution victim. To cap it all, Adam, the supposed perpetrator of the original sin, never existed in the first place: an awkward fact - excusably unknown to Paul but presumably known to an omniscient God (and Jesus, if you believe he was God?) - which fundamentally undermines the premise of the whole tortuously nasty theory. Oh, but of course, the story of Adam and Eve was only ever symbolic, wasn't it? Symbolic? So, in order to impress himself, Jesus had himself tortured and executed, in vicarious punishment for a symbolic sin committed by a non-existent individual? As I said, barking mad, as well as viciously unpleasant."
Wigglez wrote:Just remember. The sword is an extension of your arm. Use it as if you're going to karate chop someone with your really long sharp ass hand.
Shadowman wrote:High Command wrote:Shadowman wrote:High Command wrote:Shadowman wrote:KILLTRONBOT 9000 wrote:Besides, I reckon that Smooth should be allowed to say what he likes - isn't that the point about freedom of speech and the Second (?) Amendment?
1. The second amendment is the one that lets you own guns. Saying what you want is the First Amendment.
2. There's a rule that you can't bash other people's beliefs. Christianity = someone's beliefs. Calling it fiction = bashing.
Well it's my deeply held belief that the sky-bully god of the bible is a ****. So you'd better not bash my belief.
I have to disagree. I always saw it like this:
Old Testament God: Liquored-up, pissed off, Sky-bully.
New Testament God: Nicer, forgiving God, with a strict rule of non-intervention.
Except for raping a teenage Jewish virgin girl, getting her pregnant in the process and having some other guy bring up his kid? He didn't even step in to save his bastard kid when he got nailed to a tree. What a ****!
As for forgiveness Richard Dawkins sums it up best:
If God wanted to forgive our sins, why not just forgive them? In any case (one can't help wondering), who was God trying to impress [with the crucifixion of Jesus]? Presumably himself - judge and jury as well as execution victim. To cap it all, Adam, the supposed perpetrator of the original sin, never existed in the first place: an awkward fact - excusably unknown to Paul but presumably known to an omniscient God (and Jesus, if you believe he was God?) - which fundamentally undermines the premise of the whole tortuously nasty theory. Oh, but of course, the story of Adam and Eve was only ever symbolic, wasn't it? Symbolic? So, in order to impress himself, Jesus had himself tortured and executed, in vicarious punishment for a symbolic sin committed by a non-existent individual? As I said, barking mad, as well as viciously unpleasant."
That's taking it way out of context. Jesus knew ahead of time that someone was going to stab him in the back, and he knew he had to die. That's kind of how being a martyr works: You die, you become famous.
Burn wrote:I'm never clicking any of your links ever again.
Burn wrote:High Command is an arsehat.
Shadowman wrote:KILLTRONBOT 9000 wrote:Besides, I reckon that Smooth should be allowed to say what he likes - isn't that the point about freedom of speech and the Second (?) Amendment?
1. The second amendment is the one that lets you own guns. Saying what you want is the First Amendment.
2. There's a rule that you can't bash other people's beliefs. Christianity = someone's beliefs. Calling it fiction = bashing.
Cyber Bishop wrote:3. No hate speech.
No racial slurs, religious discrimination, sexism, homophobic remarks, etc. Seibertron.com is open and welcoming to everyone, and we plan on keeping it that way.
Wigglez wrote:Just remember. The sword is an extension of your arm. Use it as if you're going to karate chop someone with your really long sharp ass hand.
Spoon wrote:This is why we can't have nice things
Also why that other discussion forum was closed.
OptimusN1701 wrote:
Maybe we all should just agree to disagree on this and let it rest
He's got some pretty far-out powers to go along with them, too, including teleportation, the projection of trippy telepathic visions and illusions, and the ability to groove on the language of 98% of all known species. To uses his powers to the fullest, though, he's gotta be feelin' good vibrations; bad karma can seriously harsh his mellow, y'know?
OptimusN1701 wrote:But seriously, this looked like what was going on in the Philosopher's Forum before it got shut down.
Registered users: Bing [Bot], Bumblevivisector, Delta_Magnus, Galvatronus Prime, Glyph, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Google Feedfetcher, MarvelMan87, MSN [Bot]