Transformers and More @ The Seibertron Store
Details subject to change. See listing for latest price and availability.
Just Negare wrote:This better be true.
Anyway, why does this movie need a female lead? Is Bay that desperate that the only way they can get bums in seats is to have some half naked ho bag dancing around giant robots?
Why can't it just be about the violent giant robot war?
Autobot032 wrote:It certainly is, when people clearly state they want the man dead, his room was broken into and stuff stolen, and you publicly make idiotic comments such as deporting the man, all because he directed a movie about TransFormers.
It's not hard to make a judgment on it when it's plain as day and people willingly run their mouths and say horrible and ridiculous things over something so unimportant.
And before you say it, yes saying what you say about Bay IS important. Your comment, while idiotic, is harmless in the grand scheme of things (though irritating beyond belief), but other comments by many other people have actually threatened the man's life and had people PRAYING and HOPING he'd die.
That's important. That's borderline terroristic. They call that Terroristic Threats, and why Bay hasn't pressed charges against some of these people (and some of them can be tracked), is beyond me. He has far more patience than most people. Plenty of other famous people would've had the law crush these roaches.
I'm just so sick and tired of hearing people complain about the man. There is absolutely nothing that can be done to get him out of TransFormers. You're stuck with him, simple as that. If you don't like it, too bad. Go find something else to do.
Paramount wants money. Bay delivers money. It's safe to say that Bay's not going anywhere, and not any time soon.
These constant negative comments directed toward the man make people look pathetic. Anyone from the outside looking in would say "Okay, maybe they're right." the first time. As time goes on, someone will say "Okay, they're carrying it a bit too far." Now, if an outsider saw these comments, they'd say "Ugh. They're just as bad, if not worse than those crazy Star Wars people. It's just a movie. This is why I can't stand these nerdy geek people, they're nutter than squirrel ****."
And you know what? I'm starting to think they're right.
NewFoundStarscreamLuv wrote:me and my friends combine all the time. Sometimes I even combine by myself if no one is around.
SlyTF1 wrote:Just Negare wrote:This better be true.
Anyway, why does this movie need a female lead? Is Bay that desperate that the only way they can get bums in seats is to have some half naked ho bag dancing around giant robots?
Why can't it just be about the violent giant robot war?
Thats what Im sayin!
Autobot032 wrote:SlyTF1 wrote:Just Negare wrote:This better be true.
Anyway, why does this movie need a female lead? Is Bay that desperate that the only way they can get bums in seats is to have some half naked ho bag dancing around giant robots?
Why can't it just be about the violent giant robot war?
Thats what Im sayin!
The second movie was definitely more about the robot war. Granted, it wasn't handled quite the way we thought it would be, but it was. Definitely more than the first movie showed.
But, the general audience needs a human element to connect to, and without it, there just won't be an audience.
It's a price we have to pay to get the movies. The human element could be handled better, for sure, but at least we got the movies.
Plus, it's expensive to render the 'bots. If the movie was wall to wall robots, I'm sure it'd be a lot more costly than $200 million to produce.
SlyTF1 wrote:Autobot032 wrote:SlyTF1 wrote:Just Negare wrote:This better be true.
Anyway, why does this movie need a female lead? Is Bay that desperate that the only way they can get bums in seats is to have some half naked ho bag dancing around giant robots?
Why can't it just be about the violent giant robot war?
Thats what Im sayin!
The second movie was definitely more about the robot war. Granted, it wasn't handled quite the way we thought it would be, but it was. Definitely more than the first movie showed.
But, the general audience needs a human element to connect to, and without it, there just won't be an audience.
It's a price we have to pay to get the movies. The human element could be handled better, for sure, but at least we got the movies.
Plus, it's expensive to render the 'bots. If the movie was wall to wall robots, I'm sure it'd be a lot more costly than $200 million to produce.
In ROTF I thought it was going to be about Robots killing each other, the Matrix of leadership, the Decepticons capturing Sam, and for the most part, it happened. I did think it was going to be darker with more character deaths, and despite all my bitching about "why plot doesnt matter in a transformers movie" the plot definately was darker in ROTF. In TF1 it was about robots looking for glasses on Ebay, big f*king whoop. ROTF was about one kid's destiny to save the world from an alien race, by first realizing his destiny and building the courage to help save it while hes fighting with 40 ft robots with no weapons and every one after him trying to either kill him or capture him. yeah, and all you people who bitch about ROTF having no plot, there's your f*king plot! Read it and let it sink in so I can laugh at you once you realize that Ive been right all this time!!!
Autobot032 wrote:SlyTF1 wrote:Autobot032 wrote:SlyTF1 wrote:Just Negare wrote:This better be true.
Anyway, why does this movie need a female lead? Is Bay that desperate that the only way they can get bums in seats is to have some half naked ho bag dancing around giant robots?
Why can't it just be about the violent giant robot war?
Thats what Im sayin!
The second movie was definitely more about the robot war. Granted, it wasn't handled quite the way we thought it would be, but it was. Definitely more than the first movie showed.
But, the general audience needs a human element to connect to, and without it, there just won't be an audience.
It's a price we have to pay to get the movies. The human element could be handled better, for sure, but at least we got the movies.
Plus, it's expensive to render the 'bots. If the movie was wall to wall robots, I'm sure it'd be a lot more costly than $200 million to produce.
In ROTF I thought it was going to be about Robots killing each other, the Matrix of leadership, the Decepticons capturing Sam, and for the most part, it happened. I did think it was going to be darker with more character deaths, and despite all my bitching about "why plot doesnt matter in a transformers movie" the plot definately was darker in ROTF. In TF1 it was about robots looking for glasses on Ebay, big f*king whoop. ROTF was about one kid's destiny to save the world from an alien race, by first realizing his destiny and building the courage to help save it while hes fighting with 40 ft robots with no weapons and every one after him trying to either kill him or capture him. yeah, and all you people who bitch about ROTF having no plot, there's your f*king plot! Read it and let it sink in so I can laugh at you once you realize that Ive been right all this time!!!
ROTF clearly had a plot. The first movie, I'm not sure what it was.
We meet Sam, he meets Bumblebee. That part is fine, they conveyed that just fine. The rest of it was just a jumbled mess.
But the first time you watch the movie, you're completely at a loss. You're so excited and in awe of the impending robot scenes, you can't even pay attention to the problems.
First time watching TF1:
Why did Blackout destroy the base and it's information?
Why was Frenzy on Air Force One? (although this one was answered quickly)
Why are worldwide communications down?
None of it made sense and was terribly convoluted the first time through.
And the Decepticons blocking worldwide communications so other humans wouldn't know about the Sabot rounds seems a bit...far fetched. If anything, I'd think the Decepticons would be worried about the humans contacting the Autobots, even inadvertently. That would've made more sense than what we got.
And there were too many threads to tie up by the end of the film, and they weren't handled well.
The first movie was just an onslaught of "WOW!" to the point that no one cared how bad it was. Everyone was just sitting there going "Dude, this is the most awesome thing."
And on subsequent viewings you start to see the problems manifest, and even though you know the plot and can get around the convolutions, you don't really give a crap to do so.
You understand what the Decepticons are doing now, you understand why the Autobots haven't appeared sooner, you even get the military presence to it, after you've had a chance to let it all sink in.
And it just wasn't worth it. I was so enthralled by the movie that I watched it repeatedly in theaters and on DVD, but as I continued to watch it, I found my attention becoming more and more detached with each viewing. That's pretty bad.
The glasses had the map imprinted on them, which explains why the Decepticons were checking out eBay and looking for Sam, but why didn't they just say that from the get go? In repeat viewings, you get it. Not the first time.
The Cube, Sector 7, all of it was just handled so badly, and it wasn't Bay's fault. I read the treatment that Orci and Kurtzman had made (the leaked one) and it wasn't much different than what was on screen, and Bay had no control over that, and I think people should remember that. It the treatment sucked, the movie following it was going to.
And it was due to bad writing.
ROTF was clear, plain and simple from the get go. Anyone watching it a first time, second time, whatever, you got it. And there was a story.
ROTF wasn't the perfect film, but it was truer to it's TF roots than the first film was. It had a real villain, a plot, and the story actually worked.
I think part of the reason critics put it down is because Bay got it right the second time, and they're still feeling the sting from the first one, so they cracked on this one just to make themselves feel better.
I mean, the movie WAS better, the box office take was bigger, and the audience loved it, so....what does that say?
Bay does know what he's doing. He can't help it if the people writing it aren't worth a damn.
But I think Ehren Kruger is going to do a good job. The first film had John something or other helping Orci and Kurtzman, it was the same guy behind Catwoman (the one with Halle Berry), and that was terrible with a capital T. So to assume he'd bring anything to it was a mistake.
We've seen that Orci and Kurtzman aren't quite the wunderkinds we thought they were. I'd say what DID work in ROTF was Kruger's handiwork.
And I think he might just surprise us in 3. Besides, three writers is just too much. Too many ideas and opinions flying around.
And if the 3rd one is a hit with critics and fans, then it proves that Orci and Kurtzman were the problem.
SlyTF1 wrote:This is exactly how I feel about every thing! I thought the first movie was the greatest thing since buttered crumpets at first, but I watched it so many times that now I cant get through an hour of it. And I think the reason every one bashes ROTF is because the critics cant stand the fact that Michael Bay actually did something right, which is just encouraging fans to love it more. I like Bay granted the only Bay movie I can watch without being bored is ROTF, but the camera work and score and every thing fit so well with the scenes, that people should still love it just for that, and stop complaining about a "shallow" plot.
Autobot032 wrote:
Oh, I'll admit that ROTF has the depth of a puddle, I can't lie and say it was deep or thought provoking. I think a bit more emotion could go a long way.
Why can't people just relax their sphincter and just have fun?
G1 was just as dumb, campy, goofy, and puddle thin (in fact, it was worse), and it was embraced. Why is ROTF vilified when it embraced it's roots? I just don't get it. I really don't.
What DO people want? Because none of it makes much sense to me.
So, what is it exactly that the movie's lacking, and what the heck do you people want?
And don't give me the Dreamwave era writing crap, because it's boring and too dark and sucks the fun out of it.
I think a balance between Hollywood hijinks comedy and Dreamwave material is possible. I also think some of the fans need to let go of certain things and try and enjoy the ride.
This is all meant to be in fun. When did people forget that?
Dagon wrote:At the prodigious risk of getting blasted for this, I think the answer to the question remains the same as it always has been: some people just didn't like ROTF.
I know that's a borderline unpardonable sin, but it really, really could be the answer. It's not for the most part any deep, cosmic question.
Dagon wrote:Sure, some people have made moronic statements and stupid 'threats' based on Bay and what they see as denegration of the franchise, but for the sane people out there, it is entirely possible that some people just don't like the movies. I don't, and I don't have to, but I've not made posts about how idiotic people are for liking them nor have I made posts amounting to my personal feelings being trampled on becuase people like the films. But still, it's verboten for people to say they didn;t like the films because they are railroaded by people who did, and who feel like they have to talk about it in husheed tones because they're like, persecuted by those who didn;t like the films.
I mean, sure G1 was shallow and all of that, but it's still possible for that to be someone's favorite. Or at the least, for them to like that better.
Dagon wrote:I prefer the Dreamwave writing, and "don't give me that Dreamwave. . . because it's . . ." is really the same thing as someone saying that the writing of ROTF was too something or other. They're both opinions. But we all know that, becuase we've talked about it too much at this point. We all know that ROTF/the live action movies has become about being right. So and so didn't like it, so we all have to be 'right' and champion it. So and so did like it, and so we all have to be 'right' and denegrade it. That's all. We're not talking about the movies anymore, we're talking about being 'right'. I still challenge anyone who thinks I'm overly negative regarding ROTF to find my posts about how we should do this or that to Bay or the writers or whatver, becuase I don't say ignorant things like that, becuase I'm not interested in being 'right' about this or any other movie. And, to borrow your own phrase, don't give me that 'we;re tired of being picked on for liking the movie' line, because I don't appreciate having people take out their vitriol on me becuase I have the audacity to say "I didn't like it." Just cause some people swear and curse Bay et all, doesn;t mean that I do it, and I don't.
Dagon wrote:Aside, in your previous post, you listed things from the first movie that seemed unexplained or at least not explained well. At the continued risk of chastizement, I offer into evidence the idea that those things were not difficult to understand. The attack on the military base was explained essentially during the attack. Blackout was after the information on the computers, which was how they were attemptng to find Megatron until the convienent gathering of everyone at the dam. And, as an invading military unit, why wouldn't the Decepticons try to knock out military targets and/or disrupt communications? Sure, they are robots in disguise, but they were stiull an invasion force, or infiltration or however you'd prefer to say it, and real life human militaries do the same kind of things.
No surprise there. Fox was probably the only person willing to come out and say "Yeah, Michael Bay is a total c**t..." Maybe not in those words as such, but we all knew it.
I'm sure she'll have a lucrative career in softcore DTV bulls**t after this.
omega666 wrote:Who cares? As long as Cullen is Prime, I don't care who's in and out.
Return to Transformers Live Action Film Forum
Registered users: Bing [Bot], blackeyedprime, Bumblevivisector, chuckdawg1999, Drop Bear, Glyph, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Google Feedfetcher, Howya84, Mr.MicroMaster, MSN [Bot]