The Energon Pub

News Credits: 905 · by **Mach** » Sat Jun 13, 2009 4:10 am

http://www.theshiznit.co.uk/review/tran ... fallen.php

by **ZGMF-X88S** » Sat Jun 13, 2009 3:18 pm

OK, so he trashes the movie throughout his review, then gives it four stars? That tells me all I need to know about both the movie and the reviewer.

News Credits: 1014 · by **First Gen** » Sat Jun 13, 2009 3:28 pm

If this review was remotely professional I'd post this, but this sounds like me. :grin:

News Credits: 905 · by **Mach** » Sat Jun 13, 2009 9:15 pm

This guy really a bit unorthodox.....
But i think probably they are the earliest to publish movie review....
Maybe thats their marketing strategy.

News Credits: 22 · by **Rodimus Prime** » Sat Jun 13, 2009 11:07 pm

Well, my first thought is: this guy is a f**king idiot. He did sum up the movie well, it's consistent with what i read in the novel. But he has to put in those snide comments. and "us geeks" is just a blatant lie, because if he was one of "us" he wouldn't talk about Transformers like that. I don't know if he tried to be funny, if he did he failed miserably. He said nothing I didn't already expect. So, all in all, this review is a piece of ****.

by **Night Raid** » Sat Jun 13, 2009 11:15 pm

Rodimus Prime wrote:Well, my first thought is: this guy is a f**king idiot. He did sum up the movie well, it's consistent with what i read in the novel. But he has to put in those snide comments. and "us geeks" is just a blatant lie, because if he was one of "us" he wouldn't talk about Transformers like that. I don't know if he tried to be funny, if he did he failed miserably. He said nothing I didn't already expect. So, all in all, this review is a piece of ****.

Dude, this review gives **** a bad name!

News Credits: 905 · by **Mach** » Sun Jun 14, 2009 1:07 am

Night Raid wrote:
Dude, this review gives **** a bad name!

News Credits: 22 · by **Rodimus Prime** » Sun Jun 14, 2009 1:13 pm

Night Raid wrote:
Rodimus Prime wrote:Well, my first thought is: this guy is a f**king idiot. He did sum up the movie well, it's consistent with what i read in the novel. But he has to put in those snide comments. and "us geeks" is just a blatant lie, because if he was one of "us" he wouldn't talk about Transformers like that. I don't know if he tried to be funny, if he did he failed miserably. He said nothing I didn't already expect. So, all in all, this review is a piece of ****.

Dude, this review gives **** a bad name!

Ah, yes. My apologies to ****.

by **Coolyfett** » Sun Jun 14, 2009 1:55 pm

Real Devastator wrote:http://www.theshiznit.co.uk/review/transformers-revenge-of-the-fallen.php

Check your brain in with your coat and soak in the most gloriously dumb spectacle of the year.

Revenge Of The Fallen is a kids' movie; the secret to enjoying it as an adult is to unlock the ten-year-old within (and not the one in your cellar, bunnngg). It is, in common parlance, completely and utterly retarded.

This guy is skillfully annoying lol, I like his style, Id say he did enjoy the movie, but was saying if you are very smart it could be hard to enjoy. I am gong to watch the movie a couple times here at home to see if can find these plot holes that he speaks of.

News Credits: 2 · by **Autobobby1** » Wed Jun 17, 2009 1:19 pm

The Shiznit wrote:Revenge Of The Fallen is a kids' movie

I guess that's why it's rated PG-13 for "intense sequences of sci-fi action violence, language, some crude and sexual material, and brief drug material."

Checkmate.

by **meshnut** » Thu Jun 18, 2009 4:03 pm

Autobobby1 wrote:
The Shiznit wrote:Revenge Of The Fallen is a kids' movie

I guess that's why it's rated PG-13 for "intense sequences of sci-fi action violence, language, some crude and sexual material, and brief drug material."

Checkmate.

yes.....13 year old kids :grin: