Transformers and More @ The Seibertron Store














Details subject to change. See listing for latest price and availability.
Wigglez wrote:Just remember. The sword is an extension of your arm. Use it as if you're going to karate chop someone with your really long sharp ass hand.
Nemesis Hacker wrote:as for scorpy i reckon he will survive
Wigglez wrote:Just remember. The sword is an extension of your arm. Use it as if you're going to karate chop someone with your really long sharp ass hand.
tom brokaw wrote:he's alive because its a movie and that how movies are made. screen writers dont write like that.... screen writers write by having the average person's intelligence in mind. what i mean is, if what you're saying is true, then they wouldve shown a fuel tank being shot or him actually dying because people arent supposed to figure out the movie on their own. he survived. how? because one thing is for certain, we saw him retreat. and generally, speaking, when people see 'retreating' its because theyre running away to stay alive. thats what the writers intended. if its not, then thats poor writing because they left the audience to believe he's dead without actually showing him die. Transformers wasnt a "thinking man's" movie, in which there are deeper meanings; leaving the viewer to speculate a characters fate. however, for a general audience type of film, things are straight to the point as to what we see on screen. writers dont intend on people figuring out whether he's dead or not. we didnt exactly see him die, which means he's alive. what we already know that transformers are not from earth, therefore possessing powers and capabilities unknown to man. so even though scorponok got an asswhooping that is immense on a human scale, the audience already knows that the bots are stronger than human capabilities due to their nature of not being native to earth. what we do know is that blackout, devastator, megs, and bonecrusher are dead, because we saw them die. barricade, starscream, and scorponok are still alive because they did not show them die onscreen. leaving a plot for part 2. however, having them die when they did not show them exactly dying; leaving the audience to figure that out on their own simply wouldve been poor writing.
Wigglez wrote:Just remember. The sword is an extension of your arm. Use it as if you're going to karate chop someone with your really long sharp ass hand.
Shadowman wrote:tom brokaw wrote:he's alive because its a movie and that how movies are made. screen writers dont write like that.... screen writers write by having the average person's intelligence in mind. what i mean is, if what you're saying is true, then they wouldve shown a fuel tank being shot or him actually dying because people arent supposed to figure out the movie on their own. he survived. how? because one thing is for certain, we saw him retreat. and generally, speaking, when people see 'retreating' its because theyre running away to stay alive. thats what the writers intended. if its not, then thats poor writing because they left the audience to believe he's dead without actually showing him die. Transformers wasnt a "thinking man's" movie, in which there are deeper meanings; leaving the viewer to speculate a characters fate. however, for a general audience type of film, things are straight to the point as to what we see on screen. writers dont intend on people figuring out whether he's dead or not. we didnt exactly see him die, which means he's alive. what we already know that transformers are not from earth, therefore possessing powers and capabilities unknown to man. so even though scorponok got an asswhooping that is immense on a human scale, the audience already knows that the bots are stronger than human capabilities due to their nature of not being native to earth. what we do know is that blackout, devastator, megs, and bonecrusher are dead, because we saw them die. barricade, starscream, and scorponok are still alive because they did not show them die onscreen. leaving a plot for part 2. however, having them die when they did not show them exactly dying; leaving the audience to figure that out on their own simply wouldve been poor writing.
There's no sing-song voice for text, so I'll just say this:
You're still assuming.
Shadowman wrote:tom brokaw wrote:he's alive because its a movie and that how movies are made. screen writers dont write like that.... screen writers write by having the average person's intelligence in mind. what i mean is, if what you're saying is true, then they wouldve shown a fuel tank being shot or him actually dying because people arent supposed to figure out the movie on their own. he survived. how? because one thing is for certain, we saw him retreat. and generally, speaking, when people see 'retreating' its because theyre running away to stay alive. thats what the writers intended. if its not, then thats poor writing because they left the audience to believe he's dead without actually showing him die. Transformers wasnt a "thinking man's" movie, in which there are deeper meanings; leaving the viewer to speculate a characters fate. however, for a general audience type of film, things are straight to the point as to what we see on screen. writers dont intend on people figuring out whether he's dead or not. we didnt exactly see him die, which means he's alive. what we already know that transformers are not from earth, therefore possessing powers and capabilities unknown to man. so even though scorponok got an asswhooping that is immense on a human scale, the audience already knows that the bots are stronger than human capabilities due to their nature of not being native to earth. what we do know is that blackout, devastator, megs, and bonecrusher are dead, because we saw them die. barricade, starscream, and scorponok are still alive because they did not show them die onscreen. leaving a plot for part 2. however, having them die when they did not show them exactly dying; leaving the audience to figure that out on their own simply wouldve been poor writing.
There's no sing-song voice for text, so I'll just say this:
You're still assuming.
Autobot032 wrote:I don't know what the honest answer is, but I can say that he's most likely alive.
Why?
Starscream is the only confirmed, remaining Decepticon. (ooh. what a threat.)
But if Scorponok and Barricade are still alive (which it would seem) that might up the threat factor.
Not to mention, we never did see what happened to Dispensor (Mountain Dew machine) last we saw, he was clearly alive and quite deadly. Oh and the Escalade that grabbed the woman's head, etc.
It would be a ragtag team, but Starscream's persistent enough to carry on and force them into his team.
tom brokaw wrote:^good post....
....very misleading title. scorponok is alive and need to be adressed. bump.
Skowl wrote:A scorpion can lose it's tail and still survive and I'm pretty sure a robotic one would have an even greater chance of survival.
'nuff said. Though I don't think he'll be back for no.2 - he just won't be seen again. I don't know how much you can do with a scorpion robot that doesn't even transform and seems limited to sandy areas.
Skowl wrote:A scorpion can lose it's tail and still survive and I'm pretty sure a robotic one would have an even greater chance of survival.
'nuff said. Though I don't think he'll be back for no.2 - he just won't be seen again. I don't know how much you can do with a scorpion robot that doesn't even transform and seems limited to sandy areas.
Wigglez wrote:Just remember. The sword is an extension of your arm. Use it as if you're going to karate chop someone with your really long sharp ass hand.
'm not saying it was him getting his tail ripped off did him in, I'm saying he died a slow, painful death after escaping.
And he probably escaped to avoid further humiliation.
Return to Transformers Live Action Film Forum
Registered users: Bing [Bot], Bumblevivisector, Glyph, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], MarvelMan87, MSN [Bot], Silver Wind, Yahoo [Bot]