Transformers and More @ The Seibertron Store














Details subject to change. See listing for latest price and availability.
Everything official is canon.Shadowman wrote:So basically, you problem isn't that you don't think the creator's word counts as canon, you think non-canon works count as canon.
While true, their personal beliefs have yet to be published in any official capacity, while the Almanacs and Covenant very much have been.Shadowman wrote:See, the funny thing about the Covenant of Primus and the Allspark Almanac? They can ignore that. Just because the Allspark Almanac says one thing or the Covenant of Primus says another, doesn't mean the writers are suddenly beholden to this.
In that continuity's case, the comics work around the movies to make the continuity work with adherence to the films' events. Likewise, the Almanac's adhered to the Animated cartoon, while the Covenant adhered to the Binder of Revelation (which the Prime cartoon also had to adhere to). None of them, however, had to adhere to unpublished words that have yet to exist in any of these fictional realities.Shadowman wrote:Michael Bay ignores all of the extra comics and such for the movies, the same applies here.
Shadowman wrote:Fun fact, if I wrote a book, then gave out some fun facts at a con or something that weren't explicitly stated in the book, then some jackass came along and wrote a book completely contradicting me, I'd likely punch him in the face.
The book can, but not Alpha Trion. He can't read or write in any of the future parts. He only has access to the parts of the past and present. The "Earthfall" chapter is written by him from either his perspective or from the reports of others that he himself has personally cited. Unless he's somehow able to still write about all this while being dead, he'd have to still be alive.Shadowman wrote:He probably could have. He had an entire pre-programmed conversation with Optimus, after all. Oh, and that whole thing about the Covenant of Primus being able to read and alter the future.
Shadowman wrote:This is Sabrblade we're talking about. His ability to store trivial information about TV shows is downright superhuman.
Caelus wrote:My wife pointed out something interesting about the prehistoric Predacons. I said that everyone was complaining because transforming for them mostly consisted of them just standing up-right. She essentially said, 'So? That's what our ancestors did.'
Sabrblade wrote:He can't read or write in any of the future parts.
Wigglez wrote:Just remember. The sword is an extension of your arm. Use it as if you're going to karate chop someone with your really long sharp ass hand.
Not under normal conditions.Shadowman wrote:Sabrblade wrote:He can't read or write in any of the future parts.
He can and has.
Shadowman wrote:This is Sabrblade we're talking about. His ability to store trivial information about TV shows is downright superhuman.
Caelus wrote:My wife pointed out something interesting about the prehistoric Predacons. I said that everyone was complaining because transforming for them mostly consisted of them just standing up-right. She essentially said, 'So? That's what our ancestors did.'
Oh, belive me. Sabrblade is the last person that could be consider as the one who "think that non-canon canon here." Not in a place where so many claims "Optimus didn't gave his best in Mission City because of humans" thing.So basically, you problem isn't that you don't think the creator's word counts as canon, you think non-canon works count as canon
YRQRM0 wrote:It would be awesome to see Starscream be the main villain.
Henry921 wrote:You can always be counted on to listen to reason, Pryme.
Dead Metal wrote:Have you ever, and i mean ever seen/read/heard something that is completely original and does not copy/homage/pay tribute to something else? Here's a hint: Nope. You never have and you never will.
Silverwing wrote:Also, I feel compelled to give the obligatory:![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
One for each year of the Movieverse's decade strong tenure. Here's to a few more explosive years!
Starscream does plainly refer to them as "drones" in episode 2, but they do seem have at least some sort of individual intelligence.TulioDude wrote:I know this and old topic but I still wanna talk about it:
Can we agree that Vehicons are not drones?
Q: Are the Vehicons drones or individuals?
A: A little bit of both. They are clones. They tried to suggest this in the show, but were probably too subtle on the matter. When Starscream went into a lab and found the protoforms, the faceplates of these protoforms were similar to the Vehicons, as a suggestion on the Vehicons' origins. But the treatment of the Vehicons has evolved over the course of the show to where they could be seen as both.
Shadowman wrote:This is Sabrblade we're talking about. His ability to store trivial information about TV shows is downright superhuman.
Caelus wrote:My wife pointed out something interesting about the prehistoric Predacons. I said that everyone was complaining because transforming for them mostly consisted of them just standing up-right. She essentially said, 'So? That's what our ancestors did.'
TulioDude wrote:I know this and old topic but I still wanna talk about it:
Can we agree that Vehicons are not drones?
Wigglez wrote:Just remember. The sword is an extension of your arm. Use it as if you're going to karate chop someone with your really long sharp ass hand.
Shadowman wrote:TulioDude wrote:I know this and old topic but I still wanna talk about it:
Can we agree that Vehicons are not drones?
Dude, you want Transformers fans to agree on something? We can't even agree on what color Frenzy is!
Sabrblade wrote:Starscream does plainly refer to them as "drones" in episode 2, but they do seem have at least some sort of individual intelligence.
At SDCC 2013, there was a question asked at the Hasbro: Transformers Prime Beast Hunters Panel, in which the person asking the question wanted to know if the Vehicons were drones or individuals. Back when I was trying to do my own coverage of this event from afar (and covering an event I wasn't even able to attend was a nightmare, let me tell you), this is the answer I gathered from as much accumulated information as I could get from those who did attend:
Q: Are the Vehicons drones or individuals?
A: A little bit of both. They are clones. They tried to suggest this in the show, but were probably too subtle on the matter. When Starscream went into a lab and found the protoforms, the faceplates of these protoforms were similar to the Vehicons, as a suggestion on the Vehicons' origins. But the treatment of the Vehicons has evolved over the course of the show to where they could be seen as both.
Silverwing wrote:Also, I feel compelled to give the obligatory:![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
One for each year of the Movieverse's decade strong tenure. Here's to a few more explosive years!
Nope. Those drills were person-operated rather than self-automated.TulioDude wrote:Oh,and in episode 2,Idon't remenber very well,Starscream says to Megatron that the drones have been mining all day and night,right?I have always asumed he was talking about the Energon Dirllers.We did see them driving around on their own,didn't we?
Shadowman wrote:This is Sabrblade we're talking about. His ability to store trivial information about TV shows is downright superhuman.
Caelus wrote:My wife pointed out something interesting about the prehistoric Predacons. I said that everyone was complaining because transforming for them mostly consisted of them just standing up-right. She essentially said, 'So? That's what our ancestors did.'
There is no such episode that exists.richardnja wrote:greetings
please forgive me if this is the wrong place for my question as i couldn't find the right one..
my question is "does anybody know if the 27th and final episode of season 2 "The Old Switch-Autobot" exists? i have not seen it anywhere
thanks
Shadowman wrote:This is Sabrblade we're talking about. His ability to store trivial information about TV shows is downright superhuman.
Caelus wrote:My wife pointed out something interesting about the prehistoric Predacons. I said that everyone was complaining because transforming for them mostly consisted of them just standing up-right. She essentially said, 'So? That's what our ancestors did.'
TurboMMaster wrote:I quess both Predacon's Rising and Age of Extinction proved that Hasbro don't let anybody to create a movie or animated series without two most iconic characters.
Wigglez wrote:Just remember. The sword is an extension of your arm. Use it as if you're going to karate chop someone with your really long sharp ass hand.
Preeeeetty sure he meant "nowadays" since 1986 Hasbro was of a different mindest than today's Hasbro.Shadowman wrote:TurboMMaster wrote:I quess both Predacon's Rising and Age of Extinction proved that Hasbro don't let anybody to create a movie or animated series without two most iconic characters.
And they certainly wouldn't make a movie where one is killed off and replaced, and the other is totally rebuilt, then make an entire season of the cartoon with these new characters.
In recent times, Hasbro seems to be less strict about having to keep Megatron in the spotlight of evil, allowing current fiction to do with him as they please, even at the cost of his being the main bad guy. DOTM was allowed to killed him off and AOE replaced him with Galvatron (though it's the same guy, he was allowed to finally not be named "Megatron"). TF: Prime was allowed to let him quit evil and disband the Decepticons. And IDW was allowed to let him even become an Autobot, of all things.TurboMMaster wrote:I just wonder how they gonna solve Optimus Prime's and Megatron's return in this series. I quess both Predacon's Rising and Age of Extinction proved that Hasbro don't let anybody to create a movie or animated series without two most iconic characters. As much as I loved to see new Decepticon Overlord. I don't belive that there won't be Megatron in new series. I wonder how they solve this problem. The Same is with Optimus' it's already confirmed that he will appear as a ghost. But I don't think this will be the only way he will return.
Shadowman wrote:This is Sabrblade we're talking about. His ability to store trivial information about TV shows is downright superhuman.
Caelus wrote:My wife pointed out something interesting about the prehistoric Predacons. I said that everyone was complaining because transforming for them mostly consisted of them just standing up-right. She essentially said, 'So? That's what our ancestors did.'
That was back in 80's, where franchise was still in forming. Also, Optimus finally returned, and Galvatron is the same guy.Shadowman wrote:TurboMMaster wrote:I quess both Predacon's Rising and Age of Extinction proved that Hasbro don't let anybody to create a movie or animated series without two most iconic characters.
And they certainly wouldn't make a movie where one is killed off and replaced, and the other is totally rebuilt, then make an entire season of the cartoon with these new characters.
Well, technically, he wasn't killed off since it is estabilished, that he survived and was directing KSI all along. About renaming himself - it seems to be kinda forced in the movie.Sabrblade wrote:DOTM was allowed to killed him off and AOE replaced him with Galvatron (though it's the same guy, he was allowed to finally not be named "Megatron").
But still, Megatron is must in for any series. Like I said few times before, he (like Optimus) is not only a character, it is a trademark. Plus after PR's Megatron new form was revealed, there was a lot of comments about how people wants Unicron Megatron's toy.Sabrblade wrote:In recent times, Hasbro seems to be less strict about having to keep Megatron in the spotlight of evil, allowing current fiction to do with him as they please, even at the cost of his being the main bad guy.
Meanwhile, "Transformers Prime Beast Hunters" won in two categories.
Yasuhiro Motoda was given the Outstanding Individual Achievement in Animation (Character Animator), with Jose Lopez honored with the Outstanding Individual Achievement in Animation (Character Design).
The full-CG "Transformers" animated series is based on the "Transformers" robot toy line, which marks its 30th anniversary this year. The previous season, "Transformers Prime Beast Hunters" was named the Outstanding Special Class Animated Program at the 39th Daytime Emmys.
Silverwing wrote:Also, I feel compelled to give the obligatory:![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
One for each year of the Movieverse's decade strong tenure. Here's to a few more explosive years!
Henry921 wrote:You can always be counted on to listen to reason, Pryme.
Dead Metal wrote:Have you ever, and i mean ever seen/read/heard something that is completely original and does not copy/homage/pay tribute to something else? Here's a hint: Nope. You never have and you never will.
Shadowman wrote:This is Sabrblade we're talking about. His ability to store trivial information about TV shows is downright superhuman.
Caelus wrote:My wife pointed out something interesting about the prehistoric Predacons. I said that everyone was complaining because transforming for them mostly consisted of them just standing up-right. She essentially said, 'So? That's what our ancestors did.'
Shadowman wrote:This is Sabrblade we're talking about. His ability to store trivial information about TV shows is downright superhuman.
Caelus wrote:My wife pointed out something interesting about the prehistoric Predacons. I said that everyone was complaining because transforming for them mostly consisted of them just standing up-right. She essentially said, 'So? That's what our ancestors did.'
Return to Transformers Cartoons and Comics Forum
Registered users: 1984forever, Bing [Bot], blokefish, FireRoad, Glyph, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Google Feedfetcher, maxg, MSN [Bot], shabanowitz, sprockitz, victori, X3ROhour, Yahoo [Bot], Ziusundra