The Energon Pub

News Credits: 4 · by **craggy** » Sun Oct 28, 2007 3:07 pm

Tekka wrote:Awesome comic! Even though the spelling is bad in places.

wellcum two teh intornets.

by **Primus C-00** » Sun Oct 28, 2007 5:59 pm

sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:I've knowen for some time now just how versed you are in the topic of Quantum Physics ,its why I sought you out for this question.What I was hoping for was your opinion on how the Counterpart theory might apply to the exsample I gave you.
http://www.philosophyprofessor.com/phil ... theory.php
http://www.umsu.de/wo/archive/2005/01/2 ... rt_Theory_
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Counterpart_theory

My belief on the topic stem's from a pahicylogical point of view.That even if both worlds had very simular time lines and history.....that from the point of divergence, the events in the now differing worlds would shape its residents counterparts in different ways and in such foraging different personalitys and in a sence characters.Like with the exsample I provided for you before....the differences in her universes took place close to 400 years before she was born.Would you see both Kira's as the same character?????

Ultimately no, connected yes but not the same.

;;)

News Credits: 1 · by **sto_vo_kor_2000** » Sun Oct 28, 2007 7:48 pm

Primus C-00 wrote:
sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:I've knowen for some time now just how versed you are in the topic of Quantum Physics ,its why I sought you out for this question.What I was hoping for was your opinion on how the Counterpart theory might apply to the exsample I gave you.
http://www.philosophyprofessor.com/phil ... theory.php
http://www.umsu.de/wo/archive/2005/01/2 ... rt_Theory_
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Counterpart_theory

My belief on the topic stem's from a pahicylogical point of view.That even if both worlds had very simular time lines and history.....that from the point of divergence, the events in the now differing worlds would shape its residents counterparts in different ways and in such foraging different personalitys and in a sence characters.Like with the exsample I provided for you before....the differences in her universes took place close to 400 years before she was born.Would you see both Kira's as the same character?????

Ultimately no, connected yes but not the same.

Then you think the same way as I.You see I'm having a debate on a simular topic and the one I'm debating with believes that any alternate version of an other would be the same character.I just wanted an other members opinion.His theroy is that since they would have the same birthday and may share a few life moments that they are the same character

by **Primus C-00** » Mon Oct 29, 2007 7:42 pm

Perhaps plenary portions or avatars of a divested whole, but not the same?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avatar

:-?

News Credits: 1 · by **sto_vo_kor_2000** » Mon Oct 29, 2007 11:10 pm

Primus C-00 wrote:Perhaps plenary portions or avatars of a divested whole, but not the same?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avatar

Thats a good exsample I hadnt thought of thank you :grin:

by **Primus C-00** » Tue Oct 30, 2007 4:04 pm

*bliss*

*reassembles head*

As always it is a thank is due to you I think you'll find dear Sirrah!

by **Uniprimus** » Sat Nov 03, 2007 9:05 am

Well I see this topic has dies down.

So I'll revive it!

News Credits: 1 · by **sto_vo_kor_2000** » Sat Nov 03, 2007 2:00 pm

Eradicator wrote:Well I see this topic has dies down.

So I'll revive it!

Well it would have been nice if you would have givin us something to talk about :-?

by **Malicron** » Sat Nov 03, 2007 4:51 pm

NNNNNOOOOOOOOO!!!
Please, just let this thread die, and the last remnent of the Tramp Wars with it.

News Credits: 1 · by **sto_vo_kor_2000** » Sat Nov 03, 2007 5:10 pm

Whiner-tron wrote:NNNNNOOOOOOOOO!!!
Please, just let this thread die, and the last remnent of the Tramp Wars with it.

No we should sing to this thread's glory and drink a toast to the victory it lead to of the sencible over the stupity of the house of Tramp :grin:

News Credits: 2 · by **Tekka** » Sat Nov 03, 2007 5:12 pm

Poor Tramp.

News Credits: 3 · by **Damolisher** » Sat Nov 03, 2007 5:26 pm

"Poor Tramp?!"

News Credits: 2 · by **Tekka** » Sat Nov 03, 2007 5:53 pm

Can't help but feel sorry for someone when people go at them behind their back like a pack of rabid high school girls. It's scary behaviour in its own right.

News Credits: 3 · by **Damolisher** » Sat Nov 03, 2007 6:02 pm

Yeah, well if he hadn't constantly treated everyone who told him he was wrong like they didn't know what they were on about regardless of who they were, no-one would be mocking him.

News Credits: 1 · by **sto_vo_kor_2000** » Sat Nov 03, 2007 6:46 pm

You also got to remember that all of us talking about him "behind his back" like you stated actually said all of this to him dirrectly when he was still here.....I know I did as well as Damolisher and Whiner-tron.We all had pretty long debates with him on a number of topics.And its not our fault that we can nolonger tell him dirrectly here anymore now is it :-?

by **Tangent** » Sat Nov 03, 2007 6:57 pm

Are we allowed to use the phrase 'Tramp Wars' in everyday converstation?

I kinda miss arguing with him...

News Credits: 2 · by **Tekka** » Sat Nov 03, 2007 6:58 pm

It is your(collectively) fault it keeps getting dredged up though. =o If he was really so awful, the best thing to do would be to let sleeping dogs lay. I know Eradicator loves to incite drama, and the rest loved to argue with him. But he is gone now, let's not keep the spectre of such immaturity alive.

To facilitate such action, I suggest this thread get locked.

News Credits: 3 · by **Damolisher** » Sat Nov 03, 2007 7:03 pm

In a way, it was kinda easy, because any built up issues you had with other members who annoyed you, but you were too polite to say anything to, you could sorta take out on Tramp, because he's the one person you have no qualms about being rude to. lol. Like if someone was annoying you on a certain figure, you'd release that anger by arguing with Tramp. I know I lost it A LOT. I flamed him, etc, but you can't really say he didn't deserve it. EVERY SINGLE TIME I argued with him, I knew I was right, and he just wouldn't accept it. I mean, you could argue with him if you went to TF Archive, but I mean, he doesnt' show up much, and the mods are pretty uptight, IMO when it comes to arguing. But Tramp still went and had a 9 page debate about why the Ultimate Guide is the Ultimate Transformers resource there.

The good part about Tramp is though, through arguing with him, a lot of us seibertronians who argued against him get along pretty well now, and we have like, in-jokes from time-to-time and remenice (SP?) about the Tramp Wars.

And I'd say it's fair enough to call it every day vernacular. "Tramp Wars." Good call.

News Credits: 1 · by **sto_vo_kor_2000** » Sat Nov 03, 2007 7:05 pm

Tekka wrote:It is your(collectively) fault it keeps getting dredged up though. =o If he was really so awful, the best thing to do would be to let sleeping dogs lay. I know Eradicator loves to incite drama, and the rest loved to argue with him. But he is gone now, let's not keep the spectre of such immaturity alive.

To facilitate such action, I suggest this thread get locked.

Your welcome to your opinion but I my life's motto is "If we do not remember past mistakes and those who made them we are all doomed to re-live them" :grin:

News Credits: 2 · by **Tekka** » Sat Nov 03, 2007 7:08 pm

Fair enough. =o

by **Malicron** » Sat Nov 03, 2007 7:23 pm

Tekka wrote:It is your(collectively) fault it keeps getting dredged up though. =o If he was really so awful, the best thing to do would be to let sleeping dogs lay. I know Eradicator loves to incite drama, and the rest loved to argue with him. But he is gone now, let's not keep the spectre of such immaturity alive.

To facilitate such action, I suggest this thread get locked.

Wasn't I the one who just said "kill this thread"?