The Energon Pub

by **SamYarbrough77** » Tue Mar 10, 2009 2:40 pm

“Thats not a decepticon. Its a constuct-a-con!!” yes very cheesey BUT I'm calling it.

by **travicon** » Tue Mar 10, 2009 3:08 pm

haha we'll see

News Credits: 2 · by **Autobotic9** » Wed Mar 11, 2009 8:13 pm

If this happens, I will facepalm so hard that my face will turn inside out.

by **Night Raid** » Wed Mar 11, 2009 10:23 pm

LAAAAAME!!!!

by **SamYarbrough77** » Thu Mar 12, 2009 1:29 am

Night Raid wrote:LAAAAAME!!!!

yes, thats shia lebeof to the core

News Credits: 2 · by **Shadowman** » Thu Mar 12, 2009 1:43 pm

SamYarbrough77 wrote:
Night Raid wrote:LAAAAAME!!!!

yes, thats shia lebeof to the core

Think about it, he's not calling Shia lame, he's calling the one who wrote that line lame.

EDIT: Or he's calling the line lame. Either way, it's a terrible line that, had I thought of it first, I would have never thought of it again.

News Credits: 7 · by **Roadbuster** » Thu Mar 12, 2009 2:00 pm

SamYarbrough77 wrote:“Thats not a decepticon. Its a constuct-a-con!!” yes very cheesey BUT I'm calling it.

That line is SO full of fail.

by **Night Raid** » Thu Mar 12, 2009 3:35 pm

I meant the line!

by **SamYarbrough77** » Thu Mar 12, 2009 4:15 pm

him or tuturro will say it im sticking by it. idc how lame is defined lol

News Credits: 2 · by **Shadowman** » Thu Mar 12, 2009 5:15 pm

SamYarbrough77 wrote:him or tuturro will say it im sticking by it. idc how lame is defined lol

You wrote a lame line. As in, the line you wrote was poorly written. And unless you have any sort of proof that it will be said, it's simply a bad line that you wrote, and nothing else.

by **SamYarbrough77** » Wed Mar 18, 2009 12:50 am

Shadowman wrote:
SamYarbrough77 wrote:him or tuturro will say it im sticking by it. idc how lame is defined lol

You wrote a lame line. As in, the line you wrote was poorly written. And unless you have any sort of proof that it will be said, it's simply a bad line that you wrote, and nothing else.

yes, lame. did i see a different 2007 movie? there was a truckload of lame lines. no examples needed

News Credits: 2 · by **Shadowman** » Wed Mar 18, 2009 9:44 am

SamYarbrough77 wrote:
Shadowman wrote:
SamYarbrough77 wrote:him or tuturro will say it im sticking by it. idc how lame is defined lol

You wrote a lame line. As in, the line you wrote was poorly written. And unless you have any sort of proof that it will be said, it's simply a bad line that you wrote, and nothing else.

yes, lame. did i see a different 2007 movie?

Yeah, but that line isn't in the movies.

SamYarbrough77 wrote:there was a truckload of lame lines. no examples needed

Oh yes, please, give us some examples. An argument doesn't work if you don't give examples.

by **SamYarbrough77** » Wed Mar 18, 2009 12:12 pm

here is a few lame lines from 07 movie to start. “lets see whats under the hood” "Quit lubricanting" and the very out of place “ I AM MEGATRON!!! ” while he seems to be talking to himself.

News Credits: 2 · by **Shadowman** » Wed Mar 18, 2009 12:17 pm

SamYarbrough77 wrote:here is a few lame lines from 07 movie to start. “lets see whats under the hood”

What? How was that a bad line? That's what you say when you want to see the engine of a car.

SamYarbrough77 wrote:"Quit lubricanting"

You remember how Ironhide said Mojo "leaked lubricants all over my foot"? You remember exactly what Bumblebee was doing when Prime said that? It's not a lame line, it fits perfectly.

SamYarbrough77 wrote:and the very out of place “ I AM MEGATRON!!! ” while he seems to be talking to himself.

Most people assume he was saying that to all the scientists, who had been calling him NBE-1. It's been said that some people can still hear things when comatose, so I assume Megatron wanted to make it clear that he is NOT NBE-1.

by **SamYarbrough77** » Wed Mar 18, 2009 12:28 pm

Shadowman wrote:
SamYarbrough77 wrote:here is a few lame lines from 07 movie to start. “lets see whats under the hood”

What? How was that a bad line? That's what you say when you want to see the engine of a car.

SamYarbrough77 wrote:"Quit lubricanting"

You remember how Ironhide said Mojo "leaked lubricants all over my foot"? You remember exactly what Bumblebee was doing when Prime said that? It's not a lame line, it fits perfectly.

SamYarbrough77 wrote:and the very out of place “ I AM MEGATRON!!! ” while he seems to be talking to himself.

Most people assume he was saying that to all the scientists, who had been calling him NBE-1. It's been said that some people can still hear things when comatose, so I assume Megatron wanted to make it clear that he is NOT NBE-1.

thats a ridiculous idea there was no one left when he said it. I never said this line was in movie but a lot of us are wondering how they are working the devastator into the movie especially the name. this is my idea how they might

by **Jar Axel** » Wed Mar 18, 2009 12:35 pm

thats a ridiculous idea there was no one left when he said it.

Somebody apparently wasn't paying attention. Not only did it still show plenty of people taking cover from Megs in the area Megs flew out right over one guys head

@ Shadowman: It seemed more to me to be "How dare you do this to me; I am Megatron" in intent

News Credits: 2 · by **Shadowman** » Wed Mar 18, 2009 12:44 pm

SamYarbrough77 wrote:I never said this line was in movie but a lot of us are wondering how they are working the devastator into the movie especially the name. this is my idea how they might

Do they even NEED to call him a Constructicon? Can't they just call him Devastator? I mean, no one referred to the Seekers as Seekers.

Viperman wrote:@ Shadowman: It seemed more to me to be "How dare you do this to me; I am Megatron" in intent

I figured it was more like "Stop calling me NBE-1! I am Megatron!"

by **SamYarbrough77** » Wed Mar 18, 2009 1:56 pm

you seem quick to defend the script. I AM MEGATRON is a lame line.

News Credits: 2 · by **Shadowman** » Wed Mar 18, 2009 3:33 pm

SamYarbrough77 wrote:you seem quick to defend the script. I AM MEGATRON is a lame line.

How? It fit perfectly, it was delivered just fine, and it made perfect sense in the context of when and where it was said.

by **SamYarbrough77** » Wed Mar 18, 2009 4:52 pm

rotf lol, ok you win. with that movie so dependent on human plot with probably a total of 19 minutes robot time on screen ill give you the mercy rule

News Credits: 2 · by **Shadowman** » Wed Mar 18, 2009 5:02 pm

SamYarbrough77 wrote:rotf lol, ok you win. with that movie so dependent on human plot with probably a total of 19 minutes robot time on screen ill give you the mercy rule

The mercy rule would only apply if you were winning. All you were doing was grasping at straws trying to define a single piece of the script as "lame," ignoring the fact that the line was perfectly appropriate for the scene.

So not only do you know nothing of dialogue, you don't know basic baseball terminology either.

by **SamYarbrough77** » Wed Mar 18, 2009 5:25 pm

didn't you call me "lame" much earlier in this thread? lol. It matters not to me

News Credits: 2 · by **Shadowman** » Wed Mar 18, 2009 5:49 pm

SamYarbrough77 wrote:didn't you call me "lame" much earlier in this thread? lol. It matters not to me

No, I didn't. Anyone who was calling anything lame was in reference to the line you wrote.

And it was a very poorly written line, and you acted as if it was seriously being considered by professional scriptwriters.