I asked this with no immediate success on the General Discussion, but where (and why) did the Philosopher's Forum go?
It must've been one helluva flame war. Pity I missed it really.

Thanks in advance for your help!

Wigglez wrote:Just remember. The sword is an extension of your arm. Use it as if you're going to karate chop someone with your really long sharp ass hand.
Deadpool. wrote:The PhiloForum has been cordoned off for months already... And this question has been asked loads of times too....
It's beacuse people started flaming about religion etc, etc..
So it got out of control.
ZeroZero wrote:Deadpool. wrote:The PhiloForum has been cordoned off for months already... And this question has been asked loads of times too....
It's beacuse people started flaming about religion etc, etc..
So it got out of control.
I was waiting for you to respond to this thread!
But seriously, what these guys said.
Deadpool. wrote:ZeroZero wrote:Deadpool. wrote:The PhiloForum has been cordoned off for months already... And this question has been asked loads of times too....
It's beacuse people started flaming about religion etc, etc..
So it got out of control.
I was waiting for you to respond to this thread!
But seriously, what these guys said.
Hnnh! Am i really that predictable?
Yea, i recall telling that to people loads of times....ZeroZero wrote:Deadpool. wrote:ZeroZero wrote:Deadpool. wrote:The PhiloForum has been cordoned off for months already... And this question has been asked loads of times too....
It's beacuse people started flaming about religion etc, etc..
So it got out of control.
I was waiting for you to respond to this thread!
But seriously, what these guys said.
Hnnh! Am i really that predictable?
Maybe...
I just remember you telling this to someone in the General Discussion Forum.
It's still too difficult to maintain and could get out of hand again.The Chaos Bringer wrote:The problem as I see it is that topics were no longer questions. The idea of the philosopher's forum was for us to ask provacative questions that make other members really think about the nature of things and question what you know to be true. But then threads like "Islam must be stopped" came up. The thread was a statement, not a question. And so the only response that the poster wanted was one that supports the given statement. It wasn't open to discussion.
If Ryan gives us the philosopher's forum back, I suggest that he imposes a rule that threads must be questions, not statements. I think a rule like that would help significantly and keep all threads open to discussion.
Deadpool. wrote:QFT.Bartmanhomer wrote:The Philosopher Forum is too contronverisal to discussed. Even if the Philosopher Forum is coming back. It'll be a flame war all over again.
People are, well, people.....ZeroZero wrote:Deadpool. wrote:QFT.Bartmanhomer wrote:The Philosopher Forum is too contronverisal to discussed. Even if the Philosopher Forum is coming back. It'll be a flame war all over again.
It's a shame... I really enjoyed reading what everyone had posted. I was learning a little something everytime I visited that forum.
Bartmanhomer wrote:The Philosopher Forum is too contronverisal to discussed. Even if the Philosopher Forum is coming back. It'll be a flame war all over again.
ZeroZero wrote:Deadpool. wrote:QFT.Bartmanhomer wrote:The Philosopher Forum is too contronverisal to discussed. Even if the Philosopher Forum is coming back. It'll be a flame war all over again.
It's a shame... I really enjoyed reading what everyone had posted. I was learning a little something everytime I visited that forum.
Leonardo wrote:ZeroZero wrote:Deadpool. wrote:QFT.Bartmanhomer wrote:The Philosopher Forum is too contronverisal to discussed. Even if the Philosopher Forum is coming back. It'll be a flame war all over again.
It's a shame... I really enjoyed reading what everyone had posted. I was learning a little something everytime I visited that forum.
I concur, my friend. I too felt educated. Not always in the way of facts but often in the way of people's thoughts and arguments.
Wigglez wrote:Just remember. The sword is an extension of your arm. Use it as if you're going to karate chop someone with your really long sharp ass hand.
Shadowman wrote:But no, instead it was a Michael Moore vs. Bill O'Reilly Slugfest.
The Mad Asshatter wrote:Shadowman wrote:But no, instead it was a Michael Moore vs. Bill O'Reilly Slugfest.
I wonder what would happen if they had a baby.
Wigglez wrote:Just remember. The sword is an extension of your arm. Use it as if you're going to karate chop someone with your really long sharp ass hand.
Burn wrote:Bartmanhomer wrote:The Philosopher Forum is too contronverisal to discussed. Even if the Philosopher Forum is coming back. It'll be a flame war all over again.
Flame war or differing opinions?
If anything you shouldn't step foot into the Philospher's Forum if you weren't prepared to debate your opinions.
If you're easily upset by someone disagreeing with you, then stay out, and definitely don't run to a Mod about it.
I think if a lot of people were a little less sensitive and open to the opinions of others the PF wouldn't have gotten so bad. Sure, there were a few bad apples, but the best way to deal with bad apples like that is to not bite into them. The majority of the time it's what they want.
Bartmanhomer wrote:Burn wrote:Bartmanhomer wrote:The Philosopher Forum is too contronverisal to discussed. Even if the Philosopher Forum is coming back. It'll be a flame war all over again.
Flame war or differing opinions?
If anything you shouldn't step foot into the Philospher's Forum if you weren't prepared to debate your opinions.
If you're easily upset by someone disagreeing with you, then stay out, and definitely don't run to a Mod about it.
I think if a lot of people were a little less sensitive and open to the opinions of others the PF wouldn't have gotten so bad. Sure, there were a few bad apples, but the best way to deal with bad apples like that is to not bite into them. The majority of the time it's what they want.
I really think that there some political and religious debate and arugment are just too unstable to be discussed. I don't want to offend and start a flame war. Look, here my opinion about the flame war and differ opinion across. When they start a politicial or religious topic and one people believe this and other believe it differently. That making an opinion. However when two people aruge about the topic like one person believe they humans are created evolution by gorillas but one person believe that humans are created by divine intervention of the deity. And they start to aruge and offend they theory is big bunch of nonsense and stuff like that.
Registered users: Bing [Bot], blackeyedprime, Bumblevivisector, Fires_Of_Inferno, Glyph, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Google Feedfetcher, MSN [Bot], Nemesis Primal, TF-fan kev777, Yahoo [Bot], Ziusundra