Transformers and More @ The Seibertron Store
Details subject to change. See listing for latest price and availability.
Venom Phoenix wrote:I would sue them for saying "8-10 year old boys"
Make it "8-34 year old boys"
Heatseeker wrote:Venom Phoenix wrote:I would sue them for saying "8-10 year old boys"
Make it "8-34 year old boys"
Agreed. Only I'd say 8-34 year olds period. I can't get over how many chicks dig Transformers. I thought I was a freak for it.
Sarri wrote:I'd get Greg Weisman and tell him to make a second Gargoyles jsut with Transformers.
Gargoyles had a similar target group after all and managed to get those as well as quite a bunch out side the target group.
Gimmicks are a bit more difficult, since I'm not really into Gimmicks or electronics (unless they are dedicated like ML Soundwave). I think I'd go for something like Masterpiece Prime, he all these little things like the vents at his legs or his mouthplate and then allow the children's (or adult's) fantasy to run free.
Evank_Horizon wrote:Cool somebody FINALLY understood the point of this topic. I KNOW everybody here wants some kind of sequel to G1
or some mature storyline. But the experiment of the Spawn animated series showed us that mature cartoons doesn't work
in america. Even the 1986 TF movie could not be shown to kids today without a horde of angry mothers attacking the TV
station who aired it. Let's not turn this topic into whining about that but about creating a make-believe cartoon.
Sarri wrote:I just stumbled across the tangible holograms. No, no, no. You do not touch holograms, no matter what certain doctors claim. A hologram is not tangible. Get a robotic body or get with intangible holograms.
Dogbite wrote:Evank_Horizon wrote:Cool somebody FINALLY understood the point of this topic. I KNOW everybody here wants some kind of sequel to G1
or some mature storyline. But the experiment of the Spawn animated series showed us that mature cartoons doesn't work
in america. Even the 1986 TF movie could not be shown to kids today without a horde of angry mothers attacking the TV
station who aired it. Let's not turn this topic into whining about that but about creating a make-believe cartoon.
A more mature TF would definitely work-the fanbase is older, it has an target audience. It could work-with cable, you can do more and avoid marketing to the very young.
Beast Wars was extremely well written for a kid's show. I still watch it.
I wanted the seekers to be more than clones of Starscream. I gave the FA-22 to Skywarp because I wanted him to have a ninja style of fighting with the stealth and speed. But maybe I should have given him the mitsubishi prototype...Dogbite wrote:I don't like the JSF for Starscream/Seekers. The Raptor is fine.
Evank_Horizon wrote:Sarri wrote:I just stumbled across the tangible holograms. No, no, no. You do not touch holograms, no matter what certain doctors claim. A hologram is not tangible. Get a robotic body or get with intangible holograms.
You know after writting this I read TF:infiltration. I thought ratchet's hologram was just light but when he grabed the palm I knew I was not alone to think this could work. I don't know how often this is used in the comics after the first but I think it would be a nice way to get rid of too much humans in the show.
Sarri wrote:Evank_Horizon wrote:Sarri wrote:I just stumbled across the tangible holograms. No, no, no. You do not touch holograms, no matter what certain doctors claim. A hologram is not tangible. Get a robotic body or get with intangible holograms.
You know after writting this I read TF:infiltration. I thought ratchet's hologram was just light but when he grabed the palm I knew I was not alone to think this could work. I don't know how often this is used in the comics after the first but I think it would be a nice way to get rid of too much humans in the show.
I hate it.
When you call it hologram you'd better have it stay a hologram, otherwise make up a new name for it and give it some bogus physics.
(Besides the fact that I just think of it as a cheap cope out.)
Evank_Horizon wrote:
New things get old names. What is a pirate today? What is a mouse? And when you refer to a ship is it on water or is it in space? Is a fighter a person who fights or a supersonic plane? I think calling a tangible hologram a hologram seems pretty normal compared to those. It's just a hologram with a forcefield around it.
Sarri wrote:Evank_Horizon wrote:
New things get old names. What is a pirate today? What is a mouse? And when you refer to a ship is it on water or is it in space? Is a fighter a person who fights or a supersonic plane? I think calling a tangible hologram a hologram seems pretty normal compared to those. It's just a hologram with a forcefield around it.
But there is a vast difference between a mouse and a mouse, a ship and a space ship. (The fighter issue I can't comment on, I never heard of a supersonic plane called fighter).
On the other hand their holograms (a picture made of light) are them same as normal holograms.
And don't start with some kind of weird forcefields, I don't buy forcefields that make light waves tangible.
This is not a semantic issue of two different things having the same name, it is an issue of lazy writers. If they'd called their holograms mouse, I wouldn't have any issues with it.
AxiomScion wrote:Prowl- I like Stormwolf's ideas...
Grimlock- I really like Stormwolf's ideas...
Wheeljack- I really really like Stormwolf's ideas...
Evank_Horizon wrote:Cool somebody FINALLY understood the point of this topic. I KNOW everybody here wants some kind of sequel to G1
or some mature storyline. But the experiment of the Spawn animated series showed us that mature cartoons doesn't work
in america. Even the 1986 TF movie could not be shown to kids today without a horde of angry mothers attacking the TV
station who aired it.
Return to Transformers Cartoons and Comics Forum
Registered users: Bing [Bot], Bumblevivisector, Glyph, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Google Feedfetcher, Lunatyk, megatrontsm, MSN [Bot], Yahoo [Bot], Ziusundra