Transformers and More @ The Seibertron Store











Details subject to change. See listing for latest price and availability.
Bonecrusher27 wrote:Good day all,
Here are are some questions for your historians.
I was watching some very old Transformers toys ads, and just the other day I was looking at my old Powermaster Optimus, Piranacons and Metroplex.
And I just wondered. What in your opinions was the turning/ starting points for...
1. Equally nice modes
The one thing that really struck me even as a kid was that you often had one mode that looked decent to good, and one mode that looked crap. The bot modes often looked so forced and their proportions so off, that it didn't quite me so excited as some of the other guys every time a new figure came out. In fact, I think one of the few I felt looked quite decent in both modes were the Predacons.
When I started collecting again with the 2007 movie line, I was immediately struck by the great difference. Many of them had fantastic looking modes in bot or vehicle. Granted, some like Barricade still weren't perfectly proportioned (and DOTM Goblin Barricade is even worse). But the difference is immense.
2. Better articulation
I remember years ago how excited I was with Powermaster Prime. But looking at him now, I'm puzzled. The bot mode looking fugly is one thing, but the whole thing is, in essense, a brick. And likewise for many of the other old toys too.
Yes, recently you still have stuff like Ultimate Prime and the movie Jetfire/ Prime combo (I still think they shouldn't have tried to be too clever and just make removeable Jetfire parts who could just be fixed onto Optimus) But in general articulation is now miles ahead of what it was.
When did having elbows, knees, wrists, and even waist articulation begin?
3. Self containment
Yet one more improvement I'm enjoying and even taking for granted a bit, is the self containment for weapons that many Transformers figures these day sport. I remember way back when if you lost the weapons that was pretty much it. Now most figures are designed to have the weapons stored in one way or another in the vehicle mode itself. Some are really nice, others not so (e.g. Transformers Prime Bulkhead) but in general still a very nice touch compared to the past.
When did this happen?
I'm really interested to know when did this good stuff happen. Which year/decade, which line? I suppose improved engineering and sense of aesthetic had a lot to do with it. I'm just wondering when this good stuff happened.
Cheers!
orangeitis wrote:Why do people seem to think that integrating weapons into the Transformer is a GOOD thing? First of all, it robs the weapon(and sometimes the TF itself) of good aesthetics. Secondly, and more importantly, if you lost the weapon on some of the newer TFs, you essentially lost part of the Transformer itself, whereas if you lost one from an old figure, you could merely replace it with a different one.
That IS a good idea, I'm not denying that. Sometimes it's implemented well enough, like the CHUG Kup/Swerve mold. But it's cringe-worthy simply seeing Universe Octane's melee weapon because it's just a huge chunk of his alt mode(s).RAcast wrote:orangeitis wrote:Why do people seem to think that integrating weapons into the Transformer is a GOOD thing? First of all, it robs the weapon(and sometimes the TF itself) of good aesthetics. Secondly, and more importantly, if you lost the weapon on some of the newer TFs, you essentially lost part of the Transformer itself, whereas if you lost one from an old figure, you could merely replace it with a different one.
While you make a good point (Classics Voyager Optimus is another good example of losing the weapons kills the altmode), the POINT of integrated weapons is to prevent losing them. In early TFs, there was often nowhere to put them, they were loose separate parts. Now, there's always somewhere to plug them in so you don't lose the random bits of plastic laying around.
orangeitis wrote:
I guess there are good things and bad things to it, but if it's done wrong, it just simply ruins a figure's aesthetic, IMHO.
Bonecrusher27 wrote:orangeitis wrote:
I guess there are good things and bad things to it, but if it's done wrong, it just simply ruins a figure's aesthetic, IMHO.
Yes, and no worse in my opinion than the monstrosity that was Mechcrap.
gavinfuzzy wrote:
I actually quite like Mechcrap.Weapons like DOTM Voyager prime's gun (from takara and hasbro) as well as Lazerbeak's gun were pretty good...
Bonecrusher27 wrote:Thanks for the replies guys! It seems that Beast Wars played a huge factor... and I think it does make sense considering the sort of poses you'd have animals in, and then what joint would makes most sense - the ball joint.
I'm also astounded that you guys know so much with such long memories... I thought I was 'old' here! lol
Return to Transformers Toys Discussion
Registered users: Bing [Bot], Bumblevivisector, bvzxa, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Google Feedfetcher, MSN [Bot], Overcracker