Transformers and More @ The Seibertron Store
Details subject to change. See listing for latest price and availability.
Me, Grimlock! wrote:I thought it was awesome! Probably the best movie of 2009, anyway. One movie I'd want a sequel... if they promise not to mess it up. I don't know if it was better than Shaun of the Dead, but it's really raelly close if not. Maybe it's just cuz it's new, but it's around the same.
SPOILER, BUT DO WE HAVE TO SAY THAT IN A MOVIE THREAD?
Anyone else think the part with Woody Harrelson and his boy was really really sad? I almost cried!
Cyber Bishop wrote:Me, Grimlock! wrote:I thought it was awesome! Probably the best movie of 2009, anyway. One movie I'd want a sequel... if they promise not to mess it up. I don't know if it was better than Shaun of the Dead, but it's really raelly close if not. Maybe it's just cuz it's new, but it's around the same.
SPOILER, BUT DO WE HAVE TO SAY THAT IN A MOVIE THREAD?
Anyone else think the part with Woody Harrelson and his boy was really really sad? I almost cried!
Yeah, it was sad..
This movie had everything
Action
scares
gore
plenty of laughs
sadness
Autobot032 wrote:On a scale of 1-10, 10 of course being absolutely disgusting...where is the gore level in this flick?
I realize it's a zombie flick and some of it's played up for laughs, but some of these movies are just overkill in an unfunny yet really nauseating way.
Where does this one sit?
Wigglez wrote:Just remember. The sword is an extension of your arm. Use it as if you're going to karate chop someone with your really long sharp ass hand.
Me, Grimlock! wrote:SPOILING. ABOUT THE GORE FACTOR.
Actually, it's not really that gory. I guess you could give it some points, but other than that, there's not much blood. The beginning sequence has some gore in it, and a lot is in slo-mo.
But there aren't any zombies with missing limbs (that I can remember) and you don't see any heads ripping off or brains spilling out. Nothing spectacular. There's a lot of blood, but I think that's it: blood.
Autobot032 wrote:Me, Grimlock! wrote:SPOILING. ABOUT THE GORE FACTOR.
Actually, it's not really that gory. I guess you could give it some points, but other than that, there's not much blood. The beginning sequence has some gore in it, and a lot is in slo-mo.
But there aren't any zombies with missing limbs (that I can remember) and you don't see any heads ripping off or brains spilling out. Nothing spectacular. There's a lot of blood, but I think that's it: blood.
Works for me. Thanks!
Me, Grimlock! wrote:Autobot032 wrote:Me, Grimlock! wrote:SPOILING. ABOUT THE GORE FACTOR.
Actually, it's not really that gory. I guess you could give it some points, but other than that, there's not much blood. The beginning sequence has some gore in it, and a lot is in slo-mo.
But there aren't any zombies with missing limbs (that I can remember) and you don't see any heads ripping off or brains spilling out. Nothing spectacular. There's a lot of blood, but I think that's it: blood.
Works for me. Thanks!
And I realized I just contradicted myself. Serves me right for not going over my own post. Trust the last one there: there's blood. I can't remember exactly, but I think it's concentrated in spots, though.
Just Negare wrote:I stumbled upon a preview of this by pure accident. It looks awesome. But I have to wait till December because NZL doesn't get it till then... apparently.
hellkitty wrote:Ah yes. The Ladies Thread: warning: males entering the dreaded and estrogen-drenched domains of the Ladies Thread shall be subjected to slash references, randomness, hugz and apparently, now, sexual harassment.
Burn wrote:Name_Violation wrote:if you keep writing slash you'll get hairy palms and go blind
The man is wise.
Of course wisdom often comes from experience.
Registered users: Bing [Bot], Bumblevivisector, Glyph, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Google Feedfetcher, MSN [Bot], Sabrblade, Yahoo [Bot]