The Energon Pub

wtf? Who thougt that one up? That sounds real stupid

An_de wrote:How long should we wait for them to tell us who will be the new characters?

For TF1, the first time I heard a definite list of the characters was August 18th 2006, the film arrived a year later roughly. So maybe around mid-2008?
Maybe sooner if they are really going to crank the script out before all this strike nonsense.
Also some "new" characters were designed/modelled for TF1 but never made the final cut, so maybe sooner still.

It's a pity.

CJH wrote:For TF1, the first time I heard a definite list of the characters was August 18th 2006, the film arrived a year later roughly. So maybe around mid-2008?

Oh, I have to wait that long

I doubt thats the final decision. Could be a working plot, or could be a fake. Either way I'm sure the fans will make sure Megatron, and Starscream return.

I don't think studios let big scripts get away from studios. I mean honestly, if they did, would anyone of went to see Spiderman 3? I know I wouldn't of (you can tell I'm a bit bitter about that movie)

The script is really lame.

Auto Bot wrote:The script is really lame.

Yeah.

What kind of writers are they hiring? Cost cutting?

Auto Bot wrote:The script is really lame.

No, calling an (more than likely) un-written incomplete script is lame.

What was posted was NOT the script. It may or may not(Murphy denies, Nelson on behalf of Bay verifies) have even been a real treatment.

We have no idea if the actual script is complete and if not how far it is away from completion.

Honestly, why is this forum full of people who jump to conclusions so quickly?

Burn wrote:

Auto Bot wrote:The script is really lame.

No, calling an (more than likely) un-written incomplete script is lame.

What was posted was NOT the script. It may or may not(Murphy denies, Nelson on behalf of Bay verifies) have even been a real treatment.

We have no idea if the actual script is complete and if not how far it is away from completion.

Honestly, why is this forum full of people who jump to conclusions so quickly?

I'm pointing to that particular script. Be it intended for the Movie or not.

It's NOT even close to jumping to conclusion.

It's simply saying "The script is really lame." As i have read it.

I didn't say the Movie's script is lame.

Gets?

I wonder why many people here would automatically pull out a different meaning from a clear simple statement that you make.

I've been getting that a lot.

Like how my stating a personal opinion could be misinterpreted as proclaiming a gospel truth of some sort.

Sheesh!

His name is Burn.

Anyway, I think most of the people here are talking about what was posted on IMDB. Or the original script for the film I linked to awhile back. And this thread hasn't made a proper transition to talking about the supposed treatment for TF2 anyway.

And the leaked treatment for TF2, I can see some fans arguing about it but I don't see Auto Bot as the type to call it lame.

Thanks. Well, i'm not about to make any comments on it yet. First thing's first, i have to find it and read it.

Auto Bot wrote:I'm pointing to that particular script. Be it intended for the Movie or not.

It's NOT even close to jumping to conclusion.

It's simply saying "The script is really lame." As i have read it.

I didn't say the Movie's script is lame.

Gets?

No I don't actually.

Considering this thread started off about the "treatment" for TF2.

Perhaps it was your use of grammar? See when you say "the script is really lame" I take that as present tense. If I was referring to the first movie's script I would say something like "the script WAS really lame", as in past tense because it's done, finished. "Is" implies that it's still current, which would imply TF2.

See where the confusion comes from?

Meverix wrote:Fake.

Not even a good fake.

Actually, it's a very real rejected story treatment. And it has been confirmed as such.

Ashame it was rejected. I read the whole thing, and it was damn good.

Auto Bot wrote:Thanks. Well, i'm not about to make any comments on it yet. First thing's first, i have to find it and read it.

I'll PM it to you right now.

D-340 wrote:

Meverix wrote:Fake.

Not even a good fake.

Actually, it's a very real rejected story treatment. And it has been confirmed as such.

Ashame it was rejected. I read the whole thing, and it was damn good.

Meverix is talking about the one on IMDB.

lodelco wrote:

D-340 wrote:

Meverix wrote:Fake.

Not even a good fake.

Actually, it's a very real rejected story treatment. And it has been confirmed as such.

Ashame it was rejected. I read the whole thing, and it was damn good.

Meverix is talking about the one on IMDB.

Yeah, so am I. It was posted a couple of weeks back. Nelson on Bay's site confirmed it, and I read a report on one of the fan sites(don't remember which one) that one of the writers did as well.

Edit: No I'm not, I'm a dumbass. I was thinking the one on IESB.com. Disregard that last bit.

just proves you cant take imdb word unles you see the trailer or teaser for the film first time i checked it stated something about megtraon and minicons now they change the story into this.

wasnt this script posted on seibetron few weeks back only to be considerd a rumor unitl proven otherwise?


here are the 2 threads about the imdb scipt
http://seibertron.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=20241&sid=

http://seibertron.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=20386&sid=



heres a rumor about the aerialbots tf 2 ( i dont believe it )

hello,i'm from quebec city and i heard something of interest for us at local radio station.

here the story,in 2008,it's 400 anniversary of quebec city foundation and every 2 years we got an airshow event,next yearsis gonna be a huge one because of the 400.so it's seem that tf2 scouts would have call the city official about that airshow in june 2008,they'll wish to shoot a few action scene,one would included a b-52 in rescue!it look like they need a big crowd ,we talk about 30 000 people each time,every day!

so,will they want to have superion in the film?i hope so!is it only a rumour?

i already see that!all 5 aerialbot transforms in the middle of the crown,form superion and help the b-52 from crashing in the crowd!

so that its!
oh ,sorry if my english is bad

my source
http://www.donmurphy.net/board/showthread.php?t=22783

Burn wrote:

Auto Bot wrote:I'm pointing to that particular script. Be it intended for the Movie or not.

It's NOT even close to jumping to conclusion.

It's simply saying "The script is really lame." As i have read it.

I didn't say the Movie's script is lame.

Gets?

No I don't actually.

Considering this thread started off about the "treatment" for TF2.

Perhaps it was your use of grammar? See when you say "the script is really lame" I take that as present tense. If I was referring to the first movie's script I would say something like "the script WAS really lame", as in past tense because it's done, finished. "Is" implies that it's still current, which would imply TF2.

See where the confusion comes from?

That was why i didn't use the past tense. I wasn't referring to any old or new movie.

I'm only referring to the script that i just read. The script that was just made available to me thru a link posted a few message back.

Very much present tense.

No confusion at all.

It's just the way people think i could be leaning towards which side. It's a state of mind of the reader.

But i was not jumping into anybody's bandwagon.

It's only the script i just read. Really lame.

dragons, that's a great Devastator sig. Got any with whole body?

lodelco wrote:

Auto Bot wrote:Thanks. Well, i'm not about to make any comments on it yet. First thing's first, i have to find it and read it.

I'll PM it to you right now.

Thanks. I've ready only halfway. And it already looks like a good one.

I'll finish it up first.

The plot summary of the rejected treatment looked terrific. Like many, I felt disappointed with the amount of characterization the Transformers received in the first movie, especially the Decepticons. The first movie relied on several MacGuffins, and even though it could be argued that the plot summary involving the Creation Matrix and the power source does the same, it does so in a more interesting and potentially character-driven way. With this plot premise, the second movie could have more heart and, staggeringly enough, even bigger action.

It's probably not what the movie will turn out to be, but if it is, it'll have my dollar more than the first one did.

This new script, whether official or not, is hundred times better than what came out in the first Movie.

thanks Auto Bot had no idea my sig made such a big impression on poeple here actually i do have the entire image of him ill post link in the genarl forum so you can check it out.

dragons wrote:thanks Auto Bot had no idea my sig made such a big impression on poeple here actually i do have the entire image of him ill post link in the genarl forum so you can check it out.

Thanks. Can you provide a link here when you do that?