Fires_Of_Inferno wrote:You know, I just realized something; with the legacy toy line giving both TF Cybertron characters, as well as obscure characters...
It might be his time!
Hey, good to know I'm not the only one who remembers him? Maybe make him a Velocitronian 2-pack with a smaller Deluxe, like maybe Ransack?
AllNewSuperRobot wrote:grimdragon2001 wrote:The female figures who are normally repaints of male characters like Road Rage and Burnout, built from the ground up with 100% new sculpts that have proper female proportions.
To be honest, that creeps me out. Ever since Blackarachnia's sexualised physique in Beast Wars. I prefer the other way around. Because it wouldn't make a difference to a race of alien robots...
Strika being the perfect example. I wish all the Fem Bots were re-designed like her and less ..Kiss Player/stripper.
AllNewSuperRobot wrote:grimdragon2001 wrote:Wouldn't that be the Michael Bay stuff then? I remember a lot of people disliking those designs, and those of Beast Machines.
Personally I would be fine with more obviously alien designs though. Thing is, if the characters are going to be based on humanoid forms, then one should be able to look at a female character without any context what so ever and see a female character. And looking female doesn't automatically mean sexualized.
The main problem with the Bayformers designs (aside from awful visual gags) was their lack of a vibrant colour palette.
I've always championed that the Vehicon's were the purest vision of what Cybertronians should look like.
Beyond my bugbear that gender shouldn't be applied to robots in the first place.
I'll point out an iconic female character:
Crasher - GoBots
Pretty sure she predates Elita-1, Arcee et al
Fast forward to Blackarachnia:![]()
I'm not going to demonstrate half of the search engine results for BA or any of the subsequent FemBot designs, to make my point. There is a difference between looking feminine and sexualised. Robots with boobs and curved thighs, to me falls directly into the latter.
AllNewSuperRobot wrote:It's creepy where ever it is applied. Transformers are only humanoid as they are bipedal. Humanising them visually, in that way, caters to a certain demographic and nothing more.
While I'd also appreciate more alien designs (on both factions, having just one of them with the non-human features just makes the whole conflict sound a bit racist/speciest instead of ideological), as well as more non-conventional female molds that aren't just a male remolded/repainted (specifically Strika, much like the other Vehicon Generals), and I'm certainly against the oversexualization of Transformers, in any gender, I'm not quite as radical against their humanization and differentiation, mostly due to these points:
1) Many versions of Transformers aren't just robots, they're living robots; basically living beings that happen to be made of metal, using nanomachines for cells and programs for DNA. These versions would probably be a lot closer to biological beings in how they function than the usual "AI suddenly gained sentience" examples, including sexual dimorphism.
2) Often Transformers adopt favorite elements of the cultures they visit (like Jazz's passion for music, or Eject's sports enthusiasm), and are known to modify or even replace their bodies. Would it be that difficult to believe they'd modify their bodies to fit a gendered shape just because they like the aesthetic? Particularly in the case of Blackarachnia, where it's apparently standard practice for starships to scan and mimic local organic lifeforms (and by the time of BM the scanners've been integrated into their own bodies).
AllNewSuperRobot wrote:ZeroWolf wrote:Anything else known about the character (like was he separate from Megatron?) or is the drawing all we have?
Unless this image featured in one of the Almanacs. The drawing is all I've been able to find. But, considering Cyclonus' entry (Via TFWiki):Cyclonus appeared out of nowhere in a storm of light and tachyons over New Kaon. As Scalpel reassembled him, he noted his immense power, that his internal chronometer was off by megacycles, that he constantly muttered about someone named "Galvatron", and that — perhaps most peculiarly of all — his sourcecode shared Starscream's "self preservation" algorithms, albeit commented out. Cyclonus soon swore allegiance to Megatron, but seemingly in the abstract
I'd say Galvatron's origins appear G1 faithful too. Which in turns of design is odd.
-Kanrabat- wrote:ZeroWolf wrote:That is odd compared to what else Animated was doing with the characters.
Maybe that Galvatron would have come from the G1 universe, for a multiverse ark in Animated.
If I recall correctly, there was an interview where Derrick J. Wyatt (RIP) where he said while he'd never appear in the show, Animated Unicron existed within canon and was closer to the G1 cartoon incarnation of massive-weapon-gone-wrong.
Incidentally, Violen Jiger was his creator here! Seriously!
Also regarding simplified/potential Titans, if I may present a suggestion:
And would be anyone interested in a R.E.D. of robot Sari or Meltdown? Or one of the many anti-Transformers mechs?


