The Energon Pub

rotf i love it. no mas por favor. A little to liberal with the trolling

SamYarbrough77 wrote:rotf i love it. no mas por favor. A little to liberal with the trolling

I don't know why I bother anymore, it's clear you can't see reason. Now all you're doing is flame-baiting is an attempt to save face.

Shadowman sometimes people just like to see their words in forums not others...

talk about baiting lol

SamYarbrough77 wrote:talk about baiting lol

Yes, yes I am. When you accuse someone of trolling when all they're trying to do is point out the flaws and inaccuracies in your argument, that is flame baiting.

Why did this thread get so long?

No, I was not intentionally flame baiting. I let It die. I do and hope you can too
cheers

SamYarbrough77 wrote:No, I was not intentionally flame baiting. I let It die. I do and hope you can too
cheers

If you let it die, you'd have stopped posting by now.

mods lock maybe??

Inb4 Lock with my two pence.

It seemed more like he was saying "I BET THIS IS HOW THE CONSTRUCTICONS GET NAMED" not "I know this to be fact as I have inside knowledge and you don't lololol"...

Seemed more like idle speculation.

It's cheesy, yes, but speculation nonetheless.

Shadowman wrote:

SamYarbrough77 wrote:I never said that.

Oh yeah?

SamYarbrough77 wrote:“Thats not a decepticon. Its a constuct-a-con!!” yes very cheesey BUT I'm calling it.

SamYarbrough77 wrote:him or tuturro will say it im sticking by it. idc how lame is defined lol

So, yeah, yeah you did.

All he did there was call it, and speculate further. Not say that he had any inside knowledge.

Shadowman wrote:

SamYarbrough77 wrote:Blah. Thread almost ruined now.

You made a thread to pretend a horrible line was going to be in a movie you know next-to-nothing about, and you think it's almost ruined?

Nope, seems like he made the thread to say that if that horrible line makes it into the movie, he'd like to let it be known that he guessed it would first.

I think, ultimately, thaLALALA TROLL TROLL TROLL TROLL TROLL TROLL TROLL

wow, go go! Super OVERREACT!

I agree with Scatterlung here, there was no attempt to spoil anything or claim that there was any inside knowledge here.

How apt that the movie is being marketed at children.

SamYarbrough77 wrote:“Thats not a decepticon. Its a constuct-a-con!!” yes very cheesey BUT I'm calling it.

One word... FAIL.

Scatterlung wrote:Inb4 Lock with my two pence.

It seemed more like he was saying "I BET THIS IS HOW THE CONSTRUCTICONS GET NAMED" not "I know this to be fact as I have inside knowledge and you don't lololol"...

Seemed more like idle speculation.

It's cheesy, yes, but speculation nonetheless.

Shadowman wrote:

SamYarbrough77 wrote:I never said that.

Oh yeah?

SamYarbrough77 wrote:“Thats not a decepticon. Its a constuct-a-con!!” yes very cheesey BUT I'm calling it.

SamYarbrough77 wrote:him or tuturro will say it im sticking by it. idc how lame is defined lol

So, yeah, yeah you did.

All he did there was call it, and speculate further. Not say that he had any inside knowledge.

Shadowman wrote:

SamYarbrough77 wrote:Blah. Thread almost ruined now.

You made a thread to pretend a horrible line was going to be in a movie you know next-to-nothing about, and you think it's almost ruined?

Nope, seems like he made the thread to say that if that horrible line makes it into the movie, he'd like to let it be known that he guessed it would first.

I think, ultimately, thaLALALA TROLL TROLL TROLL TROLL TROLL TROLL TROLL

THANK YOU! You are exactly right sir, I was seriously getting depressed reading his trolling. If the first movie has lame lines then this one sure will too. (I AM MEGATRON, QUIT LUBRICATING, LETS CHECK UNDER THE HOOD, are still lame lines) I almost stopped coming to seibertron w/trolls like these, I dont mind a diff opinion but a little excessive. I just had to concede it too him lol

craggy wrote:How apt that the movie is being marketed at children.

I think the film industry is losing their grip on what should and should not be marketed towards kids. I wish I could see the face of every parent who took their kid(s) to the Dark Knight, as the Joker performed the "Disappearing Pencil" trick.

EDIT: Maybe I should say this just to end things at least on my end:

Perhaps I didn't word this right, but I do realize that the line he wrote was meant as the basis for criticizing the script of the movie. Unfortunately, the actual lines he gave from the movies were neither out of place nor ridiculous. Now, if he had mentioned the "Sam's Happy Time" dialogue (It's a funny scene, but I can't help but cringe a little), or Jazz's line "this looks like a cool place to kick it" that would have worked, and this would have been over a lot quicker.

so you went off at him for 2 pages after he said the script had some lame lines, not because you disagreed that the script had some lame lines, but because you disagreed on the particular ones he chose?

oh well, at least you had the guts to admit your mistake.

craggy wrote:so you went off at him for 2 pages after he said the script had some lame lines, not because you disagreed that the script had some lame lines, but because you disagreed on the particular ones he chose?

It's also because I didn't like how he used a line he wrote as a basis for criticism.

craggy wrote:oh well, at least you had the guts to admit your mistake.

It's rare when this happens. It's like an eclipse.

lol, anal retentive. no prob man, i enjoy discussions and its my hypothesis. I was not trying to be cool with it at all but cheezy just like the first. all sins are forgiven

WOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!