tyler1451 wrote:wtf is it?
Seibertron wrote:Yeah, I don't think the homage is intentional either. It is ironic that in both movies, Spike says "oh ****!" (at least, I think that's what he said when Barricade starts chasing after him). There's a lot of parallels that could be drawn between the two movies but I really doubt that anyone was trying to do that intentionally.
Tramp wrote:Robert Orci and Alex Kurtzman have both gone on record as saying they have been die-hard fans of the original G1 series since they were kids.
And I felt that they did deliver and were respectful. I wasn't expecting a straight G1 movie with the G1 designs. I felt it was very well put together and very well thought out. It had plenty of homages and Easter eggs to satisfy the dir-hard fans and was fresh enough to bring in new audiences, which was the whole point. And, it worked. The movie is one of the highest grossing movies of the year. If they had done the movie the way you thought it should, it would have flopped because only the die-hard fans would have gone to see it. Would you have wanted that to happen?Alex Kingdom wrote:Tramp wrote:Robert Orci and Alex Kurtzman have both gone on record as saying they have been die-hard fans of the original G1 series since they were kids.
True but I don't believe them, as the movie showed little or no evidence to support their claim. Maybe that was Bays influence but either way it came across as poorly concieved and badly reserched. You may not and it is right not to agree but that's how I saw it, You're right that I feel that way becuase the movie wasn't made the way I wanted it, I wanted it made in a way that was respectful to the source material. IMO they didn't deliver that.
Yours AK
Tramp wrote:And I felt that they did deliver and were respectful.
Tramp wrote:I wasn't expecting a straight G1 movie with the G1 designs.
Tramp wrote:I felt it was very well put together and very well thought out. It had plenty of homages and Easter eggs to satisfy the dir-hard fans and was fresh enough to bring in new audiences, which was the whole point. And, it worked. The movie is one of the highest grossing movies of the year.
Tramp wrote:If they had done the movie the way you thought it should, it would have flopped because only the die-hard fans would have gone to see it. Would you have wanted that to happen?
Alex Kingdom wrote:Again I'm glad you thought so, congratulations. However in my little world making mega buck isnt the be all and end all of making a good movie, plus I believe you can make a tidy profit without compromising on integrity. There are more ways than one to make a movie to turn a profit, it my opinion this was the easy way but not the only or best way.
Alex Kingdom wrote:There are more ways than one to make a movie to turn a profit, it my opinion this was the easy way but not the only or best way.
Rushie wrote:Alex Kingdom wrote:There are more ways than one to make a movie to turn a profit, it my opinion this was the easy way but not the only or best way.
I wouldn't exactly call it easy. There's a LOT of work put into this film. If anything, it's walking safe premade roads, formulas which have proved their popularity. But in no way whatsoever did they get lazy.
Autobot032 wrote:Integrity? G1? I think we give the cartoon far too much credit because we grew up with it, and childhood memories are attached to it.
Rushie wrote:I wouldn't exactly call it easy. There's a LOT of work put into this film. If anything, it's walking safe premade roads, formulas which have proved their popularity. But in no way whatsoever did they get lazy.
tyler1451 wrote:the only thing wrong with it is that they focused more on the humans than the giant fukin robots, speaking of which, whis is about homages not about the movie quality!
Alex Kingdom wrote:Tramp wrote:Robert Orci and Alex Kurtzman have both gone on record as saying they have been die-hard fans of the original G1 series since they were kids.
True but I don't believe them, as the movie showed little or no evidence to support their claim. Maybe that was Bays influence but either way it came across as poorly concieved and badly reserched. You may not and it is right not to agree but that's how I saw it, You're right that I feel that way becuase the movie wasn't made the way I wanted it, I wanted it made in a way that was respectful to the source material. IMO they didn't deliver that.
Yours AK
Return to Transformers Live Action Film Forum
Registered users: Bing [Bot], blokefish, Glyph, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Google Feedfetcher, MSN [Bot], Omegatron., ScottyP, Yahoo [Bot]