Cormaster628 wrote:Seriously this is the stupidest thing I think I have ever heard of!
someone needs to slap that bitch
I really want to meet the lady and slap her.
Robinson wrote:Whether or not she's got a legit case is to be determined. Most likely she will have to go after the company that produced the item for the actual infringement.
Auto Bot wrote:That Bee-otch thing is the main reason why the movie became successful.
Robinson wrote:Auto Bot wrote:That Bee-otch thing is the main reason why the movie became successful.
Um, for some odd reason I don't think that an air freshener is the "main" thing that caused the movie to make over 600 million.
Moonbase2 wrote:I don't think she really has a case.
PARAMOUNT LOGO, HASBRO LOGO, TransformersMovie.com, DreamWorks logo
Copywright (c) 2007 DreamWorks LLC and Paramount Pictures. All Rights Reserved.
Hasbro, Transformers, and all related characters are trademarks of Hasbro (c)2007. All Rights Reserved.
Burn wrote:Moonbase2 wrote:I don't think she really has a case.
Why's that?
Dran0n wrote:That's stupid.Auto Bot wrote:I was not aware that the TF production made and sold their own version of Bee-otch.
In that case, they should be sued big time. The original designer should win the case and get a multi-million dollar payment.
Return to Transformers Live Action Film Forum
Registered users: Bing [Bot], Gauntlet101010, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], MSN [Bot], ScottyP, victori