I'm not saying we don't, I agree we know every retail figure for those size classes. I was saying that the code site and line numbers shows the number of unrevealed Masters and that there's 5 exclusives we have yet to see or hear about, 4 if we assume Lancer is coming and 3 if Hound's alternate head is used (forgot about that, thanks for the reminder everyone).
Unless you aren't talking to me, I can't really tell if this is directed at anyone specific, in which case ignore me.
AllNewSuperRobot wrote:Rodimus Prime wrote:No Hot Rod or Grimlock? As much as I like them I'm kinda glad they're giving them a rest. They will probably show up later in the Trilogy.
Springer before Grimlock or Skywarp is a surprise.
And yet we know an exclusive "Voyager Skywarp Battle Pack" is also coming, so is it?
Sabrblade wrote:AllNewSuperRobot wrote:Sabrblade wrote:Nemesis Primal wrote:ZeroWolf wrote:Does that include the new Sideswipe exclusive rumoured to be a G2 version that also comes with Slamdance? I think we know all main line releases so that just leaves exclusives...
That's what the Firestormers are, that listing was primarily called the Firestormer Pack in the product listings. We also know it includes at least one other figure that begins with the letters "Ai".
Aimless
It't not a guess. The Chinese Kanji in that original listing were for Chinese names of Slandance, Sideswipe, and Aimless.
...not to say you're wrong, Sabrblade, as I don't claim to understand kanji, but that just doesn't make sense to me. Why would an exclusive set named after an Autobot subgroup containing otherwise all Autobts also randomly come with a Decepticon Battlemaster that seems like it's supposed to be the same as the retail one character-wise? They didn't even rename it to make it an Autobot character to fit in? That just doesn't sound right.