DISCHARGE wrote:microclone wrote:DISCHARGE wrote:I really think it is more in the interest to keep said destroyed
molds out of recasting to keep the collectors status high.
Hasbro and Takara know this. They are not stupid.
They also have the foresight to not expend all their resources
at once. Keep the collectors always wanting something.
By the time they actually do officially release, say Wheeljack,
previously destroyed designs will be even more sought after
because they will be the first time rereleased. People will
clamor for them.
quote]
ive heard this idea several times before and to my mind its sounds like total nonsense. the suggestion that takara has any interest in the value of vintage pieces besides some general interest just doesnt make sense. MISB G1 toys all go for high values, even those reissued like prowl, in fact they (prowls) tend to go for more than the dinobots that havent been reissued.
id be incredibly suprised of some takara business planners sat together and said 'lets not reissue sunstreaker/dinos/mirage/wheeljack for years and years and then when we have all those 40-50 year old Gwonners foaming well release them and make a load of money' no, that is plain ridiculous.
this is on par with the suggestion (and if takara themselves said this its possibly just an excuse) that devastator will not be reissued because of all the KO's. how many collectors out there would not buy a reissue gift set of devastator at say $50-70 (and he only 6 small simple bots so wont be that expensive-he could be less than that) just because you have already bought some piece of **** (and they are **** by any reasonable standard) $4 KO???
You're entirely entitled to your opinion. Unfortunately
business is run that way. With limited editions, pre-sales,
exclusives. That is exactly what they do. They wait until
they feel the time is right and the market is open for
certain items. Sometimes they just wait too long.
If Takara had no interest in the vintage market they wouldn't be
re-releasing past designs.
the point i was making is that takara would not deliberately with hold reissue to keep vintage pries high and then start selling them later. I can see takara saying 'devastator gift sets sell for upto $3000 on ebay maybe we could reissue that, its obviously desirable' but id be suprised if they said 'lets not reissue devastator and see if the prices go even higher and then well reissue it'.
sure with limited editions and pre sales there are obvious stategies but thats not what we are talking about here.
unless somebody from takara can tell me otherwise, the notion that
'takara is deliberately keeping the dinobot/streaker/mirage/wheeljack unreissued so as to keep interest and prices of vintage pieces high so they can make better sales in the future when they may reissue them'
is nonsense. I suggest they havent been reissued simply because as they say, the moulds have been destroyed.