The Energon Pub

News Credits: 1014 · by **First Gen** » Fri Jun 12, 2009 5:44 pm

Transformers Revenge of the Fallen actress Megan Fox has definitely been doing her PR rounds with another magazine cover dedicated to her and Optimus Prime on a June 19th 2009 edition of Entertainment Weekly Magazine.

''If I'm still making Transformers five years from now, I might not be so überexcited."Stated Megan Fox in an excerpt from the article in EW Magazine." But there's nothing specific that I need to accomplish. I just want to still be working.''

The magazine is on store shelves now. Check out the source on this info by clicking here.

News Credits: 456 · by **Sabrblade** » Fri Jun 12, 2009 6:06 pm

She's blocking the full view of Prime's face.

News Credits: 3 · by **Archanubis** » Fri Jun 12, 2009 6:20 pm

Sabrblade wrote:She's blocking the full view of Prime's face.

And you're complaining?

News Credits: 1 · by **YRQRM0** » Fri Jun 12, 2009 6:33 pm

Double win lol

Looks like Prime's happy

News Credits: 10 · by **JazZeke** » Fri Jun 12, 2009 8:44 pm

If I'm still making Transformers five years from now, I might not be so überexcited.

That's okay, we don't want you working on Transformers five years from now, either. All those closeups of your boobs and ass are blocking our view of the robots.

by **Ironhide63** » Fri Jun 12, 2009 9:37 pm

Posted by JazZeke on June 12th, 2009 @ 8:44pm CDT
If I'm still making Transformers five years from now, I might not be so überexcited.

That's okay, we don't want you working on Transformers five years from now, either. All those closeups of your boobs and ass are blocking our view of the robots.

You want robots more then boobs and ass???

News Credits: 11 · by **Robinson** » Fri Jun 12, 2009 10:12 pm

Sometimes I have to wonder about this fandom.

News Credits: 456 · by **Sabrblade** » Fri Jun 12, 2009 10:41 pm

Ironhide63 wrote:
JazZeke wrote:
If I'm still making Transformers five years from now, I might not be so überexcited.

That's okay, we don't want you working on Transformers five years from now, either. All those closeups of your boobs and ass are blocking our view of the robots.

You want robots more then boobs and ass???

Well, this is a Transformers movie, not a Megan Fox movie.

In fact, I say, the less humans, the better. The first movie was cluttered with them. The G1 movie only had two, that's right, TWO humans in the whole flick. and the BWII movie didn't even have ANY humans at all. And both films turned out fine.

The number of bots ought to outweigh the number of main human characters. All we really need are Sam, his parents (briefly), Mikaela, Lennox & Epps, and Simmons. No more. Just those seven will do.

Well, maybe a return of SecDef Keller as well, but that's it. Keep the humans to a minimum and give the bots more screentime and characterization.

by **jonusjaxon** » Fri Jun 12, 2009 10:50 pm

Robinson wrote:Sometimes I have to wonder about this fandom.

It's sarcasm. At least I think it is. They can't be serious :shock:

But I wouldn't mind someone other than Megan Fox's no-noes or I wish the make-up artists wouldn't spray her orange and over-do the make-up. She wears too much make-up and tries too hard to look hot when obviously she doesn't have to. She doesn't look like the tom-girl she's supposed to be. The best pix I've seen of her are the ones she's not all covered in make-up.

And I hope she's not in Transformers 5 years from now either. I hope no humans are in it. I hope there's a prequel that takes place entirely on Cybertron but I don't think we'll ever get that.

News Credits: 22 · by **Rodimus Prime** » Sat Jun 13, 2009 12:37 am

Ironhide63 wrote:
You want robots more then boobs and ass???

Yes. I can see T&A anywhere. better looking T&A. But my TFs come to life? No airhead eye candy blocking the view will be tolerated.

by **sideswipe98** » Sat Jun 13, 2009 1:42 am

whats with optimus in the backround.are he and megan fox dating? your truly(yeah right)sideswipe98 P.S. sorry if i spell the words wrong or forget words in my replys. i have a habit of doing that. :wink:

by **sideswipe98** » Sat Jun 13, 2009 1:56 am

your all idiots.your talking about more boobs and ass and less boobs and ass and less people and more robots which i do agree with and that you'd rather have MORE boobs and ass and less robot battle explosion scenes.your all idiots and i hope your all idiots in your other replys that way i can keep on saying your idiots. yours truly(yeah right)sideswipe98 :lol:

by **Warbreaker** » Sat Jun 13, 2009 2:27 am

sideswipe98 wrote:your all idiots.your talking about more boobs and ass and less boobs and ass and less people and more robots which i do agree with and that you'd rather have MORE boobs and ass and less robot battle explosion scenes.your all idiots and i hope your all idiots in your other replys that way i can keep on saying your idiots. yours truly(yeah right)sideswipe98

Erm, riiiiiiiiiight. Before you go calling us all idiots you might have wanted to fix your spelling and grammar, don't want to be the pot that calls the kettle black, hmm?

Personally, I was wondering more on what Prime was thinking what with that funny narrowed-eyes look he was giving Megan. Also, that's a VERY massive chest-window Prime has.

by **sideswipe98** » Sat Jun 13, 2009 3:38 am

look here warbreaker.what i meant was the members who wrote about boobs and ass.to me it seamed that they just wanted boobs and ass and no robots.i think just boobs and ass is called porn.and if you look at my other replys from the lastest news you see i also wrote a P.S. that will explain my spelling and grammar or grammer problem :-x

by **Warbreaker** » Sat Jun 13, 2009 3:42 am

Ah, okay then, looks like I misread the tone of your message quite badly(that, and I've never seen your previous messages). My apologies.

P.S. it's grammar.

by **sideswipe98** » Sat Jun 13, 2009 3:56 am

thank you warbreaker.i hope we be friends in the future.just kiding, nah but i hope to hear from you soon. yours truly(yeah right)sideswipe98 P.S. the yeah right is about the yours truly thing and not about what i wrote above.

by **sideswipe98** » Sat Jun 13, 2009 4:03 am

i wonder if optimus got a "boing" by looking at megan.and is he holding her with is hand or is she on his arm? ;;)

by **Warbreaker** » Sat Jun 13, 2009 4:06 am

Thank you too, and you're welcome

Now, back to the topic. Looking at Prime's head, it seems rather awkward, as if his blue helmet especially the parts just above his eyes seems too raised high up. Prime just doesn't seem to be drawn/rendered/CGI'd right.

by **sideswipe98** » Sat Jun 13, 2009 4:17 am

your right warbreaker.it looks like he thinkshe has eyebrows so he's trying to raise them but instead those two things on his helmet shifted up. 8-}

News Credits: 8 · by **Flashwave** » Sat Jun 13, 2009 9:56 am

sideswipe98 wrote:i wonder if optimus got a "boing" by looking at megan.and is he holding her with is hand or is she on his arm?

Neither. That would be his shoulder and top of what we would consider the collar bone, or in his case the truck roof.

Personally, I hope for her sake she's doing more than TF for 5 years. She's getting dangerously close to being typecasted now as it is. If in five years she's still doing it, she'd never be able to shed Mikayla for later roles.

by **Gingy650** » Sat Jun 13, 2009 11:08 am

Why put a titty licker when you could have Shia and BB?

News Credits: 1 · by **Transtopias Rodimus Prime** » Sat Jun 13, 2009 1:09 pm

Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha ha ha Ha Ha Ha Ha ha ha ha choke ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha Ha Ha ha Ha ha.... Ha! idiot train wreck. Ha ha ha ha ha Ha Ha Ha Ha ha ha ha. 8-}

by **syphonn** » Sat Jun 13, 2009 1:33 pm

Rodimus Prime wrote:
Ironhide63 wrote:
You want robots more then boobs and ass???

Yes. I can see T&A anywhere. better looking T&A. But my TFs come to life? No airhead eye candy blocking the view will be tolerated.

Agreed.

by **RiddlerJ** » Sat Jun 13, 2009 8:33 pm

''If I'm still making Transformers five years from now, I might not be so überexcited."Stated Megan Fox in an excerpt from the article in EW Magazine." But there's nothing specific that I need to accomplish. I just want to still be working.''

Tell you what, why don't you just go to your rightful place as another Maxim bimbo now, and we'll all call it a day, huh.

by **syphonn** » Sun Jun 14, 2009 12:17 pm

sideswipe98 wrote:your right warbreaker.it looks like he thinkshe has eyebrows so he's trying to raise them but instead those two things on his helmet shifted up.

It looks like he's looking down her shirt