Transformers and More @ The Seibertron Store

Details subject to change. See listing for latest price and availability.
Sorry if THAT came off as elitist.Lord Sir Duke Cobotron the 3rd wrote:Perhaps we SHOULD leave MP's out of this thread. It's kind of unfair to compare anything to these, well, masterpieces.
KO's are products of stolen property. A factory tools a mold for their client. The mold is approved. The factory goes into production and fills the clients order. The factory then keeps or "steals" the mold, retools it or not, and illegally uses that clients intellectual property or "mold" to make KOs.william-james88 wrote:Also, though the heart of the designers are in the right place, these companies have no business capitalizing on something they do not own. You were making fun of KOs the other day, but these companies violate the same laws.
A better thought out answer:shajaki wrote:you dont own any 3P figures? any particular reason?
-Kanrabat- wrote:Now, one TF toy that was not from a TF brand at the time but it is now, it's GoBots.
Burn wrote:Agamemnon wrote:Let's get back to talking about Burn's mammoth snout flopping...
Well I am Australian. It's kinda what we're known for.
Wikipedia wrote:The Gobot toyline was based on figures produced by Popy of Japan (later Bandai), named Machine Robo. In another similarity to Transformers, Tonka decided to make the figures sentient robots, rather than human-piloted mecha as they had been in Japan, and divided them into two factions – the good Guardians and evil Renegades (although early figures were simply described as ‘Friendly’ or ‘Enemy’ on the packaging). The figures were all given individual names, in contrast to the simple designations they received in Japan.[3][4]
Introduced in 1984 by Tonka Inc., the Gobots toys created the robot "sensation" that swept the nation for a short time.[5][6][7][8]
The line sold well initially, but was overtaken by Transformers. 1987 was the final year in which new Gobots were released. In 1991, Hasbro acquired the Gobots range from Tonka Inc.[9]
best designs... regardless of category you say?-Kanrabat- wrote:3rd party figures are nice and all, but they belong in the 3rd party forums.
MPs are perfect from this here thread because even MPs are not perfect. Some are good, some are bad. Afterall, the talk is what are the BEST DESIGNS regardless of categories.
I honestly didn't know this. I suppose I could have guessed seeing as how Hasbro has bought up almost every toy company other than Mattel. Although, with Hasbro acquiring all licensing from Disney, they might as well have bought Mattel-Kanrabat- wrote:Here's a History lesson:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GobotsWikipedia wrote:The Gobot toyline was based on figures produced by Popy of Japan (later Bandai), named Machine Robo. In another similarity to Transformers, Tonka decided to make the figures sentient robots, rather than human-piloted mecha as they had been in Japan, and divided them into two factions – the good Guardians and evil Renegades (although early figures were simply described as ‘Friendly’ or ‘Enemy’ on the packaging). The figures were all given individual names, in contrast to the simple designations they received in Japan.[3][4]
Introduced in 1984 by Tonka Inc., the Gobots toys created the robot "sensation" that swept the nation for a short time.[5][6][7][8]
The line sold well initially, but was overtaken by Transformers. 1987 was the final year in which new Gobots were released. In 1991, Hasbro acquired the Gobots range from Tonka Inc.[9]
So yeah, We could get some GoBots love in the Generations line.
Also, TlDr: 3rd party figures are nice and all, but they belong in the 3rd party forums.
MPs are perfect from this here thread because even MPs are not perfect. Some are good, some are bad. Afterall, the talk is what are the BEST DESIGNS regardless of categories.
Burn wrote:Agamemnon wrote:Let's get back to talking about Burn's mammoth snout flopping...
Well I am Australian. It's kinda what we're known for.
Cobotron wrote:I honestly didn't know this. I suppose I could have guessed seeing as how Hasbro has bought up almost every toy company other than Mattel. Although, with Hasbro acquiring all licensing from Disney, they might as well have bought Mattel-Kanrabat- wrote:Here's a History lesson:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GobotsWikipedia wrote:The Gobot toyline was based on figures produced by Popy of Japan (later Bandai), named Machine Robo. In another similarity to Transformers, Tonka decided to make the figures sentient robots, rather than human-piloted mecha as they had been in Japan, and divided them into two factions – the good Guardians and evil Renegades (although early figures were simply described as ‘Friendly’ or ‘Enemy’ on the packaging). The figures were all given individual names, in contrast to the simple designations they received in Japan.[3][4]
Introduced in 1984 by Tonka Inc., the Gobots toys created the robot "sensation" that swept the nation for a short time.[5][6][7][8]
The line sold well initially, but was overtaken by Transformers. 1987 was the final year in which new Gobots were released. In 1991, Hasbro acquired the Gobots range from Tonka Inc.[9]
So yeah, We could get some GoBots love in the Generations line.
skywarp-2 wrote:Just the top figure in my book, and I aim to get him!! I just hope Hasbro does something like this for all the main 1st season figures
Burn wrote:Agamemnon wrote:Let's get back to talking about Burn's mammoth snout flopping...
Well I am Australian. It's kinda what we're known for.
shajaki wrote:i was excluding MP's because... well every one of them is a work of art in a sense. however, id now like to nominate MP03 starscream.
as expected, he has a very intuitive transformation. very nice bot mode albeit not "geewun". and that realistic jet mode is damn near seamless. and now that i have 4 MP03 molds and 5 MP11 molds, i can say that the 03 mold is more structurally sound. i think only one of my MP11's fits together tightly cause of that damn sliding torso and chest/shoulders.
Burn wrote:Agamemnon wrote:Let's get back to talking about Burn's mammoth snout flopping...
Well I am Australian. It's kinda what we're known for.
skywarp-2 wrote:Cobotron, You are correct my friend. it is a bold claim. I should have stated I do not own him up front. I just figured I would be safe with the premise being in terms of design, and from what I have seen, in video reviews on Youtube, the seibertron gallery, and images of it from around the web, I still stand by my statement, that MP-10 is the best and brightest. I did however own Cybertron Prime, and Armada, and Many others. I own MP-1, but from what I can tell, MP-10 is definitely the version I want the most.. I MUST HAVE IT!!!!
Now if they can take MP Skywarp, and Starscream and reduce it's scale while retaining functionality and cartoon and vehicle accuracy, I would be extremely happy. Smaller figures in masterpiece format, means better cost, and the possibility of a three pack combo which could be a godsend in terms of price for bulk collecting. Tho, I would wish Hasbro would invest in collector friendly packaging, with a door over the front, and a slide out tray for easy storage, and travel..I hate their one time open packaging..
I like the ease of being able to put them away if I need to, like cleaning, and rearraging my collections. plus if I move to a new house, or room in my house, or event o take to a friend to show off, it is nice to have packaging that helps with that like the Takara Tomy stuff does.
Burn wrote:Agamemnon wrote:Let's get back to talking about Burn's mammoth snout flopping...
Well I am Australian. It's kinda what we're known for.
Burn wrote:Agamemnon wrote:Let's get back to talking about Burn's mammoth snout flopping...
Well I am Australian. It's kinda what we're known for.
Cobotron wrote:@skywarp-2
It happened again. Do you keep editing? why does this happen?
I like your PE idea!!!!!!!!!!!!!
skywarp-2 wrote:Cobotron wrote:@skywarp-2
It happened again. Do you keep editing? why does this happen?
I like your PE idea!!!!!!!!!!!!!
LMAO! yea sorry.. At work, and I forget to say something and have to revise..
A PE line would make my Millennium!!
Burn wrote:Agamemnon wrote:Let's get back to talking about Burn's mammoth snout flopping...
Well I am Australian. It's kinda what we're known for.
JelZe GoldRabbit wrote:Cobotron wrote:I honestly didn't know this. I suppose I could have guessed seeing as how Hasbro has bought up almost every toy company other than Mattel. Although, with Hasbro acquiring all licensing from Disney, they might as well have bought Mattel-Kanrabat- wrote:Here's a History lesson:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GobotsWikipedia wrote:The Gobot toyline was based on figures produced by Popy of Japan (later Bandai), named Machine Robo. In another similarity to Transformers, Tonka decided to make the figures sentient robots, rather than human-piloted mecha as they had been in Japan, and divided them into two factions – the good Guardians and evil Renegades (although early figures were simply described as ‘Friendly’ or ‘Enemy’ on the packaging). The figures were all given individual names, in contrast to the simple designations they received in Japan.[3][4]
Introduced in 1984 by Tonka Inc., the Gobots toys created the robot "sensation" that swept the nation for a short time.[5][6][7][8]
The line sold well initially, but was overtaken by Transformers. 1987 was the final year in which new Gobots were released. In 1991, Hasbro acquired the Gobots range from Tonka Inc.[9]
So yeah, We could get some GoBots love in the Generations line.
Slight correction about the Gobots, Wikipedia is slightly misleading there: Hasbro may have the IP which includes names and characters, but they don't have the rights to the original Gobots molds, which are Machine Robo by Bandai. Reissues or updated designs would be impossible at this point, since Bandai is a major player in the US now.
Long story short: Bandai owns the original toy designs, which were released in the US as Gobots via Tonka, and Hasbro owns the proper Gobots IP. I doubt either will yield to the other for the US market.
-Kanrabat- wrote:The only purpose was to kill the competition. Sigh... Pathetic.
Burn wrote:Agamemnon wrote:Let's get back to talking about Burn's mammoth snout flopping...
Well I am Australian. It's kinda what we're known for.
Cobotron wrote:-Kanrabat- wrote:The only purpose was to kill the competition. Sigh... Pathetic.
Big business, watcha gonna do?
-Kanrabat- wrote:[Also, MP-10 is defenitely a "best". Perfect everything and he's fun to transform!
skywarp-2 wrote:-Kanrabat- wrote:[Also, MP-10 is defenitely a "best". Perfect everything and he's fun to transform!
Awesome, a first hand account! I can not wait to get mine!!
Burn wrote:Agamemnon wrote:Let's get back to talking about Burn's mammoth snout flopping...
Well I am Australian. It's kinda what we're known for.
*sigh*... alright...Cobotron wrote:I have yet to hear anyone chose the MP03 mold over the MP11. Until now. This is interesting because I don't own an MP11 mold. I was one of the lucky few who found a Skywarp in the clearance isle of Walmart for $19.99. I gotta thing for Skywarp. He's my fav seeker.
Before him the only other MP I had was MP01, or whatever the TRU version was numbered, and like Skywarp he was a great deal at 50% off. Both of these figures left me skeptical towards the MP line. I wasn't hooked until I got Red Alert.
SOOOO....
I am considering picking up TRU Sunstorm. I actually like his paint job, and I don't own any other versions of this character. He is the least expensive option for this mold, and would be a neat oddity in my collection.
shajaki, in your opinion, should I skip it? Skywarp is not my favorite toy. I'm glad I have him, but IMO he is a fiddly fart, and I spend very little time playing with him.
Return to Transformers Toys Discussion
Registered users: Bing [Bot], Bumblevivisector, Glyph, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Insidious, MSN [Bot], Sabrblade, sprockitz, Whifflefire, Yahoo [Bot]