No.
It's the same [world]," Bay clarified, explaining that 4 will not be a complete reboot. "You have the three movies, but there's a reason why there's a new cast. And it's explained very clearly when you see it, and it's going to feel natural. So it's not like we're starting over or anything like that.
Rated X wrote:I don't see why people expect anything more than eye candy. I could care less what bimbo they use as long as they have one. I'm among a rare breed of people who enjoy explosions, potty humor, and hot women in action movies. I don't analyze acting skills because that's boring and movies are supposed to be fun. Let Siskel and Ebert rest in peace and enjoy the damn movie. Yo Bay, Let em Burn !!!!
noctorro wrote:I really don't understand hot or (try to be) hot chicks in action movies.
If they don't kick ass just like the dudes, but are there only for eye candy. Why?
If one wants to see good looking women with few clothes, watch porn. Those women are hotter and show more.
Am I the only one who can seperate sexual urges from science fiction/fantasy?
njb902 wrote:noctorro wrote:I really don't understand hot or (try to be) hot chicks in action movies.
If they don't kick ass just like the dudes, but are there only for eye candy. Why?
If one wants to see good looking women with few clothes, watch porn. Those women are hotter and show more.
Am I the only one who can seperate sexual urges from science fiction/fantasy?
Couldn't agree with ya more.
Rated X wrote:njb902 wrote:noctorro wrote:I really don't understand hot or (try to be) hot chicks in action movies.
If they don't kick ass just like the dudes, but are there only for eye candy. Why?
If one wants to see good looking women with few clothes, watch porn. Those women are hotter and show more.
Am I the only one who can seperate sexual urges from science fiction/fantasy?
Couldn't agree with ya more.
I really dont understand how you guys dont appreciate beautiful women in movies.
njb902 wrote:Rated X wrote:njb902 wrote:noctorro wrote:I really don't understand hot or (try to be) hot chicks in action movies.
If they don't kick ass just like the dudes, but are there only for eye candy. Why?
If one wants to see good looking women with few clothes, watch porn. Those women are hotter and show more.
Am I the only one who can seperate sexual urges from science fiction/fantasy?
Couldn't agree with ya more.
I really dont understand how you guys dont appreciate beautiful women in movies.
I don't go to a movie to ogle women.
But then they come on here and talk all kinds of s**t about her. Exactly what do you want her to do in the movie ? The movie script called for Sam Witwicky to have a sexy girlfriend and she played the part quite well. What would you have preferred in the script ? Maybe for Sam to have a "partner" instead ? Or maybe for Sam to have necrophilia fetish throughout the movie ? I think Megan Fox played her part just fine and I don't associate anything she does in real life with her character in the movie. Hot chicks rule ! 
Rated X wrote:I don't go to movies, the mall, work, restaurants, or any other place to specifically ogle women. But if they happen to be present and worth ogling, why not ? Anybody on this forum would sleep with Megan Fox if they had the chance.
Rated X wrote:njb902 wrote:Rated X wrote:njb902 wrote:noctorro wrote:I really don't understand hot or (try to be) hot chicks in action movies.
If they don't kick ass just like the dudes, but are there only for eye candy. Why?
If one wants to see good looking women with few clothes, watch porn. Those women are hotter and show more.
Am I the only one who can seperate sexual urges from science fiction/fantasy?
Couldn't agree with ya more.
I really dont understand how you guys dont appreciate beautiful women in movies.
I don't go to a movie to ogle women.
I don't go to movies, the mall, work, restaurants, or any other place to specifically ogle women. But if they happen to be present and worth ogling, why not ? Anybody on this forum would sleep with Megan Fox if they had the chance.
