Behind the Magic: The Visual Effects of 'Transformers Age of Extinction'
Posted by LOST Cybertronian
Dec 18, 2014 at 11:29pm CST
68,269 views
View Discussion
Sign in
or
Join
to reply
More Bots. More News. More Awesome.
Re: Behind the Magic: The Visual Effects of 'Transformers Age of Extinction'
(view post)
Comment by Peridot
Dec 19, 2014
At 1:16 into the video- Crosshairs has a beard/stubble?! 
Re: Behind the Magic: The Visual Effects of 'Transformers Age of Extinction'
(view post)
He does have a mustache, though.
Comment by Sabrblade
Dec 19, 2014
It's the lighting/shadow on the angles of his chin.Metro Prime wrote:At 1:16 into the video- Crosshairs has a beard/stubble?!
He does have a mustache, though.

Re: Behind the Magic: The Visual Effects of 'Transformers Age of Extinction'
(view post)
This definitely doesn't look like a shadow:

You can also see it here:

It's actually very appropriate, considering Crosshairs's personality and voice actor.
Comment by Peridot
Dec 19, 2014
Sabrblade wrote:It's the lighting/shadow on the angles of his chin.Metro Prime wrote:At 1:16 into the video- Crosshairs has a beard/stubble?!
He does have a mustache, though.
This definitely doesn't look like a shadow:

You can also see it here:

It's actually very appropriate, considering Crosshairs's personality and voice actor.
Re: Behind the Magic: The Visual Effects of 'Transformers Age of Extinction'
(view post)
Comment by Sabrblade
Dec 19, 2014
Sure it does. Those parts angle downward and inward, being the undersides of his nose and lips.Metro Prime wrote:This definitely doesn't look like a shadow:
Re: Behind the Magic: The Visual Effects of 'Transformers Age of Extinction'
(view post)
And I'm going to argue against both explanations. What you have is a CG animator taking artistic license with his color palette and letting the audience run wild with its imagination. There are indeed two different colors but the shadow theory is nixed because, in the close up pic, there are two colors on the same plane on the left side of his face (our right side as we look at it) and it's receiving even light
The facial hair theory is blown because the deeper color that is supposed as "facial hair" is such that, if you take his entire face into account, he would have "hair" all over his face in a pattern and places that no human would ever have it.
Nice to see your imaginations are still working boys, but that's all you've got there ...imagination. Follow the patterns, follow the full degree of lighting and then get inside the mind of a CGI guy and you'll have your answer. I know, my way isn't as much fun.
Comment by CrankyOldTruck
Dec 19, 2014
Sabrblade wrote:Sure it does. Those parts angle downward and inward, being the undersides of his nose and lips.Metro Prime wrote:This definitely doesn't look like a shadow:
And I'm going to argue against both explanations. What you have is a CG animator taking artistic license with his color palette and letting the audience run wild with its imagination. There are indeed two different colors but the shadow theory is nixed because, in the close up pic, there are two colors on the same plane on the left side of his face (our right side as we look at it) and it's receiving even light
The facial hair theory is blown because the deeper color that is supposed as "facial hair" is such that, if you take his entire face into account, he would have "hair" all over his face in a pattern and places that no human would ever have it.
Nice to see your imaginations are still working boys, but that's all you've got there ...imagination. Follow the patterns, follow the full degree of lighting and then get inside the mind of a CGI guy and you'll have your answer. I know, my way isn't as much fun.
Re: Behind the Magic: The Visual Effects of 'Transformers Age of Extinction'
(view post)
Animators can't just "take artistic license". Paramount had to give ILM some finalized (or at least near finalized) concept art at some point, which they used for the final models. ILM cannot just alter the designs because they feel like it. The only spot that's even out of place or unnatural, at least noticably so, is the stuff under his eyes, and that could easily be war paint or anti-glare stripes. AND EVEN THEN, they're giant alien shapeshifting robots. Do you really expect their facial "hair", if it's even hair, to conform exactly to human facial hair growth patterns?
Comment by Peridot
Dec 20, 2014
CrankyOldTruck wrote:Sabrblade wrote:Sure it does. Those parts angle downward and inward, being the undersides of his nose and lips.Metro Prime wrote:This definitely doesn't look like a shadow:
And I'm going to argue against both explanations. What you have is a CG animator taking artistic license with his color palette and letting the audience run wild with its imagination. There are indeed two different colors but the shadow theory is nixed because, in the close up pic, there are two colors on the same plane on the left side of his face (our right side as we look at it) and it's receiving even light
The facial hair theory is blown because the deeper color that is supposed as "facial hair" is such that, if you take his entire face into account, he would have "hair" all over his face in a pattern and places that no human would ever have it.
Nice to see your imaginations are still working boys, but that's all you've got there ...imagination. Follow the patterns, follow the full degree of lighting and then get inside the mind of a CGI guy and you'll have your answer. I know, my way isn't as much fun.
Animators can't just "take artistic license". Paramount had to give ILM some finalized (or at least near finalized) concept art at some point, which they used for the final models. ILM cannot just alter the designs because they feel like it. The only spot that's even out of place or unnatural, at least noticably so, is the stuff under his eyes, and that could easily be war paint or anti-glare stripes. AND EVEN THEN, they're giant alien shapeshifting robots. Do you really expect their facial "hair", if it's even hair, to conform exactly to human facial hair growth patterns?
Re: Behind the Magic: The Visual Effects of 'Transformers Age of Extinction'
(view post)
Comment by Rodimus Prime
Dec 20, 2014
I disagree. There's nothing about the facial structure suggesting that those parts are angled inward. Also, they're the same shade above and under his mouth. So if he has a mustache (as you claim) then he has to have a small beard, or at the very least, stubble. Otherwise, he has neither, which is what it looks like to me. If he did, his face would look a little more like Sentinel's did in DoTM, not flat and smooth as it does in those stills.Sabrblade wrote:Sure it does. Those parts angle downward and inward, being the undersides of his nose and lips.Metro Prime wrote:This definitely doesn't look like a shadow:
Re: Behind the Magic: The Visual Effects of 'Transformers Age of Extinction'
(view post)
Comment by Rodimus Prime
Dec 22, 2014
Re: Behind the Magic: The Visual Effects of 'Transformers Age of Extinction'
(view post)
Comment by Sabrblade
Dec 22, 2014
http://www.seibertron.com/transformers/ ... ler/31445/Rodimus Prime wrote::lol:![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Re: Behind the Magic: The Visual Effects of 'Transformers Age of Extinction'
(view post)
Comment by Rodimus Prime
Dec 22, 2014
So now 2 threads have the video. 
Re: Behind the Magic: The Visual Effects of 'Transformers Age of Extinction'
(view post)
Comment by Sabrblade
Dec 22, 2014
What's the other thread?Rodimus Prime wrote:So now 2 threads have the video.
Re: Behind the Magic: The Visual Effects of 'Transformers Age of Extinction'
(view post)
Comment by Rodimus Prime
Dec 22, 2014
Oh never mind. I thought your link was to a thread just for the Youtube video. So the video is posted in this thread. At least twice. 
Re: Behind the Magic: The Visual Effects of 'Transformers Age of Extinction'
(view post)
Comment by LOST Cybertronian
Feb 9, 2015
ILMVisualFX has uploaded their latest behind the scenes video for Transformers: Age of Extinction. This time they explore the making of the Knightship. Check out the video embedded below.
Creating the Knightship for "Transformers: Age of Extinction" was an immense challenge for the visual effects team due to it's massive scale. In fact, the Knightship is over five times larger than the worm-like drilling robot that appeared in "Dark of the Moon" which had previously held the record at ILM for most complex model.
Re: Behind the Magic: The Visual Effects of 'Transformers Age of Extinction'
(view post)
Comment by Ultra Markus
Feb 9, 2015
that 3d rendering of the ship spinning around looks like a giant hand
maybe its unicrons hand.............
maybe its unicrons hand.............
Re: Behind the Magic: The Visual Effects of 'Transformers Age of Extinction'
(view post)
Comment by Rodimus Prime
Feb 10, 2015
I really hope we get a lot more of this stuff in the upcoming film instead of humans.
Re: Behind the Magic: The Visual Effects of 'Transformers Age of Extinction'
(view post)
Comment by Autobot032
Mar 15, 2015
According to Deadline, an industry trade website, Transformers: Age Of Extinction was the clear winner of 2014, having the largest box office take of the year, it even beat out other big greats such as American Sniper and The Lego Movie!
2014 wasn't the strongest box office year, movies didn't sell as well as they had in past years and the economy has been rough on a lot of people, so frivolous spending such as going to the movies (which can be incredibly expensive) is out of the question for some, if not many.
With this in mind, seeing Age Of Extinction take the number one spot is awesome for us Transformer fans because the brand is still alive and fresh, even with new and casual fans as well old school who've been here since the beginning. With more Transformers success, the more Transformers toys and series we'll get and that's always a good thing.
You can read the full article and see the rest of the staggering numbers over at Deadline, here, and when you're done come on back to the forums and share your thoughts on this big news!

Keep your optics tuned to Seibertron.com for the latest in news and updates, plus the best galleries around!
2014 wasn't the strongest box office year, movies didn't sell as well as they had in past years and the economy has been rough on a lot of people, so frivolous spending such as going to the movies (which can be incredibly expensive) is out of the question for some, if not many.
With this in mind, seeing Age Of Extinction take the number one spot is awesome for us Transformer fans because the brand is still alive and fresh, even with new and casual fans as well old school who've been here since the beginning. With more Transformers success, the more Transformers toys and series we'll get and that's always a good thing.
THE BOTTOM LINE: Transformers: Age Of Extinction turned in a $245M domestic gross, did $545M foreign and another $301M China (Paramount kept $75 million of that), for a total of $1.09 billion. That is just short of the last installment, Transformers: Dark Of The Moon, which grossed $1.12B to become the first Transformers to crack the billion dollar gross mark.
You can read the full article and see the rest of the staggering numbers over at Deadline, here, and when you're done come on back to the forums and share your thoughts on this big news!

Keep your optics tuned to Seibertron.com for the latest in news and updates, plus the best galleries around!
Re: Behind the Magic: The Visual Effects of 'Transformers Age of Extinction'
(view post)
Comment by SlyTF1
Mar 15, 2015
A well deserved victory.
Re: Behind the Magic: The Visual Effects of 'Transformers Age of Extinction'
(view post)
Comment by griftimus prime
Mar 15, 2015
very hard movie to finish in one sitting. worst of the 4
Re: Behind the Magic: The Visual Effects of 'Transformers Age of Extinction'
(view post)
Comment by Autobot_Benz
Mar 15, 2015
Best movie since the first one. Love Age Of Extinction
Re: Behind the Magic: The Visual Effects of 'Transformers Age of Extinction'
(view post)
Comment by Bouncy X
Mar 15, 2015
i thought it was the "just right" movie of the bunch.....
okay i just said that because those above me claimed it the worst and then another the best. i wanted to three little bears-it-up!!!
okay i just said that because those above me claimed it the worst and then another the best. i wanted to three little bears-it-up!!!