Concept Art of ROTF Demolishor, Arcee & Chromia Revealed!

Skowl wrote:

Demolishor

Purchase of toy now officially justified.

if demolisher were about 50 times smaller, he could fit in perfectly with biker sisters

Does it hurt when they transform?

Sick!

Undead Waffles wrote:if demolisher were about 50 times smaller, he could fit in perfectly with biker sisters

He can be their big brother.

Nice to see Demolisher always looked like crap. Arcee would've been cool if they gave her legs. The wheel feet thing should be a battle mode not the standard. Chromia looks horrible. Looks like hse's already been blasted a few times then dropped from a high elevation and then run over by a few cars.

Sweet! Ducati 1098/1198 (or perhaps 848) and a Suzuki B-King... The third sister is supposed to transform in a MV Agusta F4. Are these altmodes confirmed?

Too bad they didn't use the Ducati StreetFighter.

I just love how far out of the "box" these bots go. Can you imagine what the engineers at Hasbro said when they saw these concepts? 10 bucks says they sh!t their pants. "How are we going to make these into toys???"

Personally, I like these designs...the originality of the line is it's best feature.

I like the sisters. Wonder how the Arcee toys looks like.
Today I saw that at our toystores here in Amsterdam finally the ROTF toys are available.
And the Demolishor toys sucks. But we already knew that.

Chromia and Arcee are awesome, but I LOVE Demolisher's design. I just wish the toy was better. I'd love to see a robot replicas of any of these, since the toys cant capture their awesomeness.

Somehow these remind me of nagas...

i just don't get why bay likes the "wheels for feet" design so much. too many bots in this movie have them.

Demolisher = AWESOME! I love it.
I think the female ones should have had legs.

I think Demolisher OR the girls should have the wheel, not all of them!

I think the wheels look unrealistic. The way they're balanced would make them all susceptible to a wide variety of wheel-locking incidents that would likely make them useless (except to fall on things). And Chromia at least comes from a Vehicon design, even her toy is just a retrofit, so there's nothing really new.

First-Aid wrote:I just love how far out of the "box" these bots go. Can you imagine what the engineers at Hasbro said when they saw these concepts? 10 bucks says they sh!t their pants. "How are we going to make these into toys???"

Personally, I like these designs...the originality of the line is it's best feature.

Whereas I'm not crazy about the design, I actually see this being easier for Hasbro to work with. They're used to having to hide vehicle bits and kibble. The bike chicks just look like they're standing on their back wheel and the rest of their bodies just kind of folds and flops out

Demolishor looks AMAZING!
And the sisters. Hey, I'm into the idea with the whole one wheel thing. To me, it works well with Chromia, but when you look at Arcee and her body. I mean seriously, it makes you wanna go "WTF?" I wish she was more symetrical like her sis and Demolishor. But still, pretty cool.

looking at the girls again, they kind of remind me of an "older" womman with the facial features

DEMOLISHER - TOTALLY AMAZING!
ACREE - GOOD
CHROMIA - Meh, worst of the 3 bikes
3RD BIKE WHOS NAME I DONT KNOW - Very good, My favourite of all the bikes!

Demolisher looks awesome, i like ho his feet are one wheel like chromia.Arcee looks wicked.everyone says the art concept for the first film looks better.i think the new form looks better, i just put her as my backround.chromia looks alright, i like the toy better.and i think it's skids 2.0. or someone, i think the third sister is either moonracer or elita-one. sideswipe98 P.S. check either wikipedia or transformers wikia.

Hi, new here.

Been a long time visitor just because I'm a concept artist and I like looking at the movies concept art. In terms of design, I don't really enjoy the look of the Bike sisters.

I'm a huge fan of the previous Arcee design, but these new design just don't sit well due to their lack of, well, solid mass. I'm not concerned with if they function, that was never an issue with any of the Transformers designs for the movies past and present. Example was when KNB made the puppets for both Frenzy and Scorponox, the design was only for aesthetics and not to function. KNB had to do a lot of filling in the blanks to make the puppets work, not even to transform really just to move around!

No, I just don't like how they look. I'm not a huge fan of the mythos, so I'm pretty open minded but these are just worse then what I expected from ILM.

Demolisher is neat, but again something about the design. You get this great machine with this huge robotic arm to just crush and carry away with a scooper of teeth, you would think revolving your design around that would be a no brainer....instead of revolving it around two huge monster truck wheels. I do like the head design though....so kuddos for that.

Later,
Josh

What is it with Bay's designers and wheel-bots?




Oh and Chromia's not the same Arcee? Ok. Does anyone know what's Chromia personality like?

They made Demolishor look small and fat! The motorbike sisters are starting to grow on me.

Still nobody has seen the Arcee toy? Or did I miss something?
What did surpise me is that they did NOT combine in the movie. And everybody was so sure they would... I didn't think so that they would combine though, also not the toyline. If I look at them it doesn't make sense.

I actually love all these designs Because with how many different shapes they take transformers should look fairly different. Demolisher's tread/wheels are probably my favorite innovation in the designs of all of them and in the movie he is awesome for his short screen time. The sister's design makes sense to me although Arcee's isnt as cool as the others in my opinion. Why is she lopsided? Wierd.