There images of the toys in both modes and in and out of the packages.
You can view the images below, or click here for the SW related sites own story.






Chaoslock wrote:At least as long they are making THESE, they are NOT designing any other things![]()
Menbailee wrote:When Takara initially marketed the toys that would become Transformers, they met with failure, even though they were cool toys. With no characters and no story, no one cared.
These toys have no story. They don't fit in the Star Wars universe or the Transformers universe. If TF characters changed into SW vehicles, as fans have suggested many times, then there would be an intuitive story with well-known characters from both sides, even if Hasbro didn't release any supplemental fiction.
Also, they look awful. Poor design. Hasbro... why?
Badass Grimlock wrote:Menbailee wrote:When Takara initially marketed the toys that would become Transformers, they met with failure, even though they were cool toys. With no characters and no story, no one cared.
These toys have no story. They don't fit in the Star Wars universe or the Transformers universe. If TF characters changed into SW vehicles, as fans have suggested many times, then there would be an intuitive story with well-known characters from both sides, even if Hasbro didn't release any supplemental fiction.
Also, they look awful. Poor design. Hasbro... why?
Menbailee is right. The Transformers brand became popular in the 80's only because they had a story and characters.
However, I have a Gen. Grievous TF that I usually put under the Decepticon faction...
Gothganon wrote:Cut off both of the Crossovers and use your money on GOOD figures from the actual CANONNICAL SERIES!
No usless repaints(EG. Golfire Grimlock, Atomic Lugnut) and make redecos ONLY if nessesary like seekers and show-accurate characters.
cheeser82 wrote:It would seem that I am the only one who likes the tank droid.![]()
Would it help if I said I hate that mold for the Jedi?