Seibertron's Review of Transformers Movie Preview Update!
Tuesday, February 13th, 2007 10:04PM CST
Category: Movie NewsPosted by: GetterDragun Views: 22,561
Topic Options: View Discussion · Sign in or Join to reply
INCREDIBLE!
Update: Ryan just gave me a call and explained what has been going on the past 2 days. The hotel he was at had limited internet conectivity and he wasnt able to get the review posted yet, and now tonight more good news he doesnt know if he is going to be able to get out of New York because of weather delays with Jet Blue. He is stuck in the Air port right now trying to figure out if he is going to be able to make it home or even what time. So stay tuned to Seibertron.com and the review will be posted ASAP.
~Air Commander Starscream~
News Search
Got Transformers News? Let us know here!
Most Popular Transformers News
SEIBERTRON Turns 25! Celebrate with 25% off Transformers Toys + Energon Universe Comics
39,320 viewsMost Recent Transformers News
Posted by Hotrod on February 13th, 2007 @ 10:06pm CST
Posted by Darth Bombshell on February 13th, 2007 @ 10:06pm CST

Posted by osiricon on February 13th, 2007 @ 10:07pm CST
Posted by Nemesis_Apoc on February 13th, 2007 @ 10:08pm CST
http://seibertron.com/forums/viewtopic. ... 3ec2fbe2f8
Posted by Chosen on February 13th, 2007 @ 10:09pm CST
Posted by bumblezzz on February 13th, 2007 @ 10:09pm CST
and yes prime with a mouth.
loads of comedy.
really sound better than the original movie and possibly the best Bay movie ever. not worth being called bayformers.
and bb has an airfresaner that has a yellow vw buggy the says b-octh
Posted by bumblezzz on February 13th, 2007 @ 10:10pm CST
Posted by jgilkinson on February 13th, 2007 @ 10:11pm CST
Posted by Megatron Wolf on February 13th, 2007 @ 10:12pm CST
Posted by Air Commander Starscream on February 13th, 2007 @ 10:13pm CST
Posted by Marcus Rush on February 13th, 2007 @ 10:18pm CST
Posted by Liege Evilmus on February 13th, 2007 @ 10:18pm CST
We're gonna hear alot of reviews anbout this movie, but this is the one we know we can trust!
Posted by Greed on February 13th, 2007 @ 10:19pm CST
Megatron_Wolf wrote:Lucky bastard, Lets hope some one snuck in a camera
You know someone did.
I'm still on the fence as whether or not I'll see this movie.
Posted by Ninja Sixshot on February 13th, 2007 @ 10:20pm CST
Posted by Liege Evilmus on February 13th, 2007 @ 10:22pm CST

Posted by MysteriousDewd on February 13th, 2007 @ 10:42pm CST
Posted by Wheeljack35 on February 13th, 2007 @ 10:46pm CST
Nemesis_Apoc wrote:It must be related to this that I found at Tformers.com earlier.
http://seibertron.com/forums/viewtopic. ... 3ec2fbe2f8
I would check this thread there is a synopsis of what was shown
Posted by Megatron Wolf on February 13th, 2007 @ 10:58pm CST
And it sucks typing on a PSP
Posted by Immortal Starscream on February 13th, 2007 @ 11:09pm CST
Posted by Greed on February 13th, 2007 @ 11:11pm CST
Megatron_Wolf wrote:I want to know who dose BB and Blackouts voices and if Prime sounds like PRIME. This movie is going to ride on if the bots act and sound like G1
And it sucks typing on a PSP
BB is a mute that can only speak through music while in his alt mode.
Posted by D-340 on February 13th, 2007 @ 11:26pm CST

Posted by Seibertron on February 13th, 2007 @ 11:33pm CST
I still think the robots could have been designed better ... but after watching the Autobots interact in a scene that I won't mention here, I'm convinced finally that the movie guys got it right.
Posted by timshinn73 on February 13th, 2007 @ 11:34pm CST
http://transformersclub.com
Features a short Bay interview. Interesting read.
Posted by First-Aid on February 13th, 2007 @ 11:58pm CST

Posted by Prowl76 on February 14th, 2007 @ 12:00am CST
Posted by Megatron Wolf on February 14th, 2007 @ 12:02am CST
Posted by Wheeljack35 on February 14th, 2007 @ 12:03am CST
Seibertron wrote:Okay, I just got back from dinner with Ben Yee (bwtf.com) and Kevin and Jason Lukis (unicron.com). Kevin and Jason just left the bar downstairs and now it's time for me to work before I hit the sack. Man, tomorrow is going to suck for sleep.
I still think the robots could have been designed better ... but after watching the Autobots interact in a scene that I won't mention here, I'm convinced finally that the movie guys got it right.
Oh boo Tell me I don't care
Posted by Burn on February 14th, 2007 @ 12:07am CST
Alpha Strike wrote:a movie's largest critics now singing its praises? Damn this is gotta be one hell of a movie to induce that sort of transformation.
You're suprised by the change of heart?

Of course it's ironic that people who condemned the movie based on un-finished material now seem to be praising it based on the opinions of others who have only seen a small sampling.
Posted by Wheeljack35 on February 14th, 2007 @ 12:09am CST
Posted by Seibertron on February 14th, 2007 @ 12:25am CST
I've written about 1/2 of my review of the "event" so far. I haven't gotten to writing about the incredible scenes that we saw at the theatre. I'm falling asleep writing this since I only got about 4 hours of sleep last night and have been up since 7 this morning (Eastern). I have a long day of traveling tomorrow and will have plenty of time to finish writing my review then. I'm going to get some sleep tonight and promise that there'll be a review up on the site within 24 hours. New York kicked my ass. It's been a blast but I'm beat!
Posted by The Collector on February 14th, 2007 @ 12:27am CST
I asked, "Why is Optimus Prime a long nose Peter-built model rather than the classic flat-nose version?" Bay responded explaining that the flat-nose version would not allow Prime to realistically transform into the 28-foot tall robot they were looking for. The classic look gave Prime a height of only 23 feet, while the longer nose gives Prime more to work with when transforming. This height difference was a factor in keeping Megatron and Prime in the proper scale to each other.
Damn, if I'd known Bay wanted a TALL Optimus I would've sent him MY design! Its based on a Peterbilt VERY close to the movie's, (MINUS the flames!) and is surprisingly faithful to G1 OP. I actually went to a Peterbilt yard with my measuring tape, did the numbers, and mine came out at 36 feet, give or take about 2 feet.
Posted by Seibertron on February 14th, 2007 @ 12:28am CST
Burn wrote:Alpha Strike wrote:a movie's largest critics now singing its praises? Damn this is gotta be one hell of a movie to induce that sort of transformation.
You're suprised by the change of heart?![]()
Of course it's ironic that people who condemned the movie based on un-finished material now seem to be praising it based on the opinions of others who have only seen a small sampling.
It wasn't a small sampling. It was about 25 minutes of film. 4 different scenes. Sure, there's a lot that we haven't seen but what I did see was absolutely incredible. I still think there were better ways to do the robot modes but what I saw tonight was mind blowing. I get it now. Now I understand what they were trying to tell us when they said "you need to wait until you see this in person, see a Transformer transform."
Posted by Seibertron on February 14th, 2007 @ 12:30am CST
Greed wrote:Megatron_Wolf wrote:Lucky bastard, Lets hope some one snuck in a camera
You know someone did.
I'm still on the fence as whether or not I'll see this movie.
I would highly doubt it. It was mostly people in suits. Not the kind of people that would be sneaking in a camera.
Posted by Seibertron on February 14th, 2007 @ 12:31am CST
Megatron_Wolf wrote:were the hell in new york was it shown? i live on long island and didnt hear anything. if id have known i wouldve gone. god damn it
It was invitation only and was not open to the public.
Posted by TheMuffin on February 14th, 2007 @ 12:35am CST
Posted by Stormrider on February 14th, 2007 @ 1:27am CST
Nemesis_Apoc wrote:It must be related to this that I found at Tformers.com earlier.
http://seibertron.com/forums/viewtopic. ... 3ec2fbe2f8
Did anyone see this from the article:
Michael Bay also stated that it takes them something like 38 hours to render 1 frame of the film with the robots in it.
38 hours for 1 frame? There's either very few frames with robots in it or else Bay needs to get moving quickly if he wants to make deadline.
Posted by Stormrider on February 14th, 2007 @ 1:30am CST
Seibertron wrote:Megatron_Wolf wrote:were the hell in new york was it shown? i live on long island and didnt hear anything. if id have known i wouldve gone. god damn it
It was invitation only and was not open to the public.
Well, I am very glad they invited you. I give Dreamworks or Paramount credit if they were the ones who offered you an invitation.
Posted by TheMuffin on February 14th, 2007 @ 1:33am CST
stormrider wrote:Nemesis_Apoc wrote:It must be related to this that I found at Tformers.com earlier.
http://seibertron.com/forums/viewtopic. ... 3ec2fbe2f8
Did anyone see this from the article:Michael Bay also stated that it takes them something like 38 hours to render 1 frame of the film with the robots in it.
38 hours for 1 frame? There's either very few frames with robots in it or else Bay needs to get moving quickly if he wants to make deadline.
I'm thinking that has to be a misprint. I don't care if you have a million poly model it's not going to take that long to render a single frame. 38 minutes? Yeah that's understandable.
Posted by Burn on February 14th, 2007 @ 2:14am CST
Seibertron wrote:Now I understand what they were trying to tell us when they said "you need to wait until you see this in person, see a Transformer transform."
That's what I was saying ... don't judge until you see it. Though you were at least open minded about things Ryan, I just hope some of those who are firmly against the movie will at least be swayed enough to CONSIDER checking it out and who knows, hopefully fully supporting it.
Posted by zoso504 on February 14th, 2007 @ 2:31am CST
"And that's when you hear the classic transforming noise from the cartoon. Yes, guys, it's in there."
Awesome.
Posted by Yeti on February 14th, 2007 @ 2:47am CST
Anyway, looks like the PMA has paid off looking at the preview reviews

Posted by D-340 on February 14th, 2007 @ 2:47am CST
Burn wrote:Seibertron wrote:Now I understand what they were trying to tell us when they said "you need to wait until you see this in person, see a Transformer transform."
That's what I was saying ... don't judge until you see it. Though you were at least open minded about things Ryan, I just hope some of those who are firmly against the movie will at least be swayed enough to CONSIDER checking it out and who knows, hopefully fully supporting it.
I'd like to think they'd be swayed, but I doubt it. No matter how many people say it looks good you'll always have the haters.
And darn you needing sleep, Seibs

Posted by Optimus_julio on February 14th, 2007 @ 5:17am CST
Posted by Heavy B on February 14th, 2007 @ 5:50am CST
Posted by Calenatarion on February 14th, 2007 @ 6:06am CST
Posted by Sickshot on February 14th, 2007 @ 6:53am CST
Posted by Rijie on February 14th, 2007 @ 7:42am CST

Posted by SAJse on February 14th, 2007 @ 7:56am CST
Zuko wrote:stormrider wrote:Nemesis_Apoc wrote:It must be related to this that I found at Tformers.com earlier.
http://seibertron.com/forums/viewtopic. ... 3ec2fbe2f8
Did anyone see this from the article:Michael Bay also stated that it takes them something like 38 hours to render 1 frame of the film with the robots in it.
38 hours for 1 frame? There's either very few frames with robots in it or else Bay needs to get moving quickly if he wants to make deadline.
I'm thinking that has to be a misprint. I don't care if you have a million poly model it's not going to take that long to render a single frame. 38 minutes? Yeah that's understandable.
38 hours doesn't sound too unreasonable when you consider how much detail is involved. Plus something like this will most likely require several different types of renders for one frame alone (not sure if that's taken into account).
Posted by Milanion on February 14th, 2007 @ 8:18am CST
Posted by First-Aid on February 14th, 2007 @ 8:22am CST
Zuko wrote:stormrider wrote:Nemesis_Apoc wrote:It must be related to this that I found at Tformers.com earlier.
http://seibertron.com/forums/viewtopic. ... 3ec2fbe2f8
Did anyone see this from the article:Michael Bay also stated that it takes them something like 38 hours to render 1 frame of the film with the robots in it.
38 hours for 1 frame? There's either very few frames with robots in it or else Bay needs to get moving quickly if he wants to make deadline.
I'm thinking that has to be a misprint. I don't care if you have a million poly model it's not going to take that long to render a single frame. 38 minutes? Yeah that's understandable.
I don't think he meant actual hours here...I'm suspecting he meant man-hours. Basically, the hours will depend on how many people are working on the movie. If one person works for 2 hours, you get two man-hours. If TEN people work for 2 hours you get 20 man-hours...a lot more work done in a very little amount of time. That's where the high price tag for this movie comes in: you have to pay hundreds of uber-geek computer geniuses for thousands of hours of work over the course of 9 months to polish the movie effects.