Transformers One Critic Reviews are Out, Currently 89% on Rotten Tomatoes

Crap. THat's not a good sign. If the critics like it, that usually means the fans and general public won't.

First-Aid wrote:Crap. THat's not a good sign. If the critics like it, that usually means the fans and general public won't.

No, the bumblebee film had both critics and general public on the same page in liking it. And both general public and critics hated TLK

william-james88 wrote:

First-Aid wrote:Crap. THat's not a good sign. If the critics like it, that usually means the fans and general public won't.

No, the bumblebee film had both critics and general public on the same page in liking it. And both general public and critics hated TLK

Two incidents that are the exceptions. Pacific Rim? Any of the other Transformers movies? Most Marvel movies? (Critics loved The Eternals, but fans bombed it) Battle Angel Alita? Sorry, vast majority of critics have no damned idea what the general public likes. I'll be HAPPY if this succeeds because it means more TF movies sans humanus, but I just have a bad feeling.

First-Aid wrote:I'll be HAPPY if this succeeds because it means more TF movies sans humanus, but I just have a bad feeling.

I have tried staying away from all spoilers except the 2 trailers, and to me it looks like the story will be rushed. That usually means thin or nonexistent character development.

Got my ticket to see it early on Saturday the 14th.

First-Aid wrote:Crap. THat's not a good sign. If the critics like it, that usually means the fans and general public won't.

Not necessarily.

Often, both officials and public opinions align. That's the proof of a PERFECT movie.

Still, the public opinion weight more IMO.
Especially when the critics love a movie but the public doesn't. Even more so when the publics reviews gets deleted in order to protect the movie.

Disney pay a lot of "protection money". But other companies didn't, like the ones who made the Borderland movie.

I have my skepticism, but all of my fellow Transformers fans are going to it tomorrow night.

It just gives me Nickelodeon and illumination imbecile humor vibes. Apparently the trailer showcases 90% of them in sequence which is why it comes off as a complete joke.

I'm not feeling the art style whatsoever, that 2D animated clip that came out in the past few days is way more indicative of what I'd like to see, as well as high Moon studios Fall of Cybertron and war for Cybertron, but as a Transformers property, I am obligated to give it a chance.

I hope it's good, I really do, however, I have to say that as a Transformers movie, it's supposed to convince me to buy the toys, and there's not a single character design I'd want to have a toy of. As a movie, it might be great, as a toy commercial, eh...

PhotonWaveZero wrote:as a Transformers movie, it's supposed to convince me to buy the toys,.

No, not to you and not this time. The target demographic for the toy portion is kids.

Also, i’m a bit puzzled now, were the bay films meant to be toy commercials? They felt more like excuses for other types of product placement (like cars and beer)

I thought the toy commercials were more what the TV shows are.

william-james88 wrote:

PhotonWaveZero wrote:as a Transformers movie, it's supposed to convince me to buy the toys,.

No, not to you and not this time. The target demographic for the toy portion is kids.

Also, i’m a bit puzzled now, were the bay films meant to be toy commercials? They felt more like excuses for other types of product placement (like cars and beer)

...and Megan Fox's abs....

Roundup of Reivews for Transformers One, looks crazy promising.

william-james88 wrote:

PhotonWaveZero wrote:as a Transformers movie, it's supposed to convince me to buy the toys,.

No, not to you and not this time. The target demographic for the toy portion is kids.

Also, i’m a bit puzzled now, were the bay films meant to be toy commercials? They felt more like excuses for other types of product placement (like cars and beer)

I thought the toy commercials were more what the TV shows are.

Well, yes & no? I think it's not so simple for a franchise. Paramount is there to make money on the Box Office and VOD/Streamling money, Hasbro's in it for the licensing and toys sales. But the creative aspect is mostly in Paramount's hands and Hasbro probably have very little impact/input of the designs. And due to the toy development cycle vs. movie's CG production changes, we have mainline toys that comes out at the same time as the movie's theatrical release that can look very different to each other.

What I HATE since ROTB is that Hasbro coming out with "Studio Series" of movie figures that still doesn't look like the screen version. It's just the mainline fighting with the SS version for thesame spending money. It's stupid.

cloudballoon wrote:What I HATE since ROTB is that Hasbro coming out with "Studio Series" of movie figures that still doesn't look like the screen version. It's just the mainline fighting with the SS version for thesame spending money. It's stupid.

The Bumblebee movie Studio Series toys for Bee, Dropkick, and Shatter were like that too.

Sabrblade wrote:

cloudballoon wrote:What I HATE since ROTB is that Hasbro coming out with "Studio Series" of movie figures that still doesn't look like the screen version. It's just the mainline fighting with the SS version for thesame spending money. It's stupid.

The Bumblebee movie Studio Series toys for Bee, Dropkick, and Shatter were like that too.

I know SS is focused more on scale (with the exclusion of Devastator) so getting a triple changer with the SS level of detailing into a deluxe mold just wasn't going to happen I don't think, at least not on the budget they wanted.

Sabrblade wrote:

cloudballoon wrote:What I HATE since ROTB is that Hasbro coming out with "Studio Series" of movie figures that still doesn't look like the screen version. It's just the mainline fighting with the SS version for thesame spending money. It's stupid.

The Bumblebee movie Studio Series toys for Bee, Dropkick, and Shatter were like that too.

The first round of them, yeah. But the second Dropkick and Shatter releases used more accurate designs

Just saw it tonight. Two thumbs up for me.

I went to see the early screening today. I can confirm that this is a really good Transformers movie, and just a good movie. It's very character driven, which was something the live action movies lacked due to the medium. This film does a great job of presenting the motivations and conflicts of the main cast. It's very easy to sympathize with Orion Pax and D-16.
This version of events is distinct from previous iterations, but takes just enough cues from established lore that it still resonates with how we long-time fans (or at least me!) feel the story is supposed to go. No aspect of this movie feels out of place or foreign.
Tonally, it rests on an admirable balance of accessible-to-kids and appreciable-to-adults. Other people in the theater, child and adult alike, laughed and gasped at the same parts.

I really liked the film, and I think it will have a positive impact on the perception of the franchise on the general public. It may even be the greatest movie of the year. Or maybe the decade.This will be a culture-shaping moment that will impact the philosophies of the coming years. When people of the future think back on the year 2024, they will remember that Donald Trump was shot and Transformers One graced our cinemas. This film will likely break the record for highest-grossing film of all time, soaring past Endgame and Titanic. This film could spawn a whole franchise that will last 40 years.

First-Aid wrote:Crap. THat's not a good sign. If the critics like it, that usually means the fans and general public won't.

What are you talking about? I could name you dozens, probably even hundreds of examples where thats not the case. And tbh i trust critics more than I trust the general public

The way I see it, after seeing the movie for myself, the fans most likely to dislike this movie are those who feel strongly that The Transformers should be only ever be one particular way that should never be deviated from in their minds. Those with more open minds who are more accepting of different versions and different interpretations should easily be able to find this movie enjoyable.

This movie is one big love letter to the brand, paying much respect to the past 40 years of history while also trying to do its own original take on familiar ground. Without spoiling anything, let's just say I was pleasantly that a lot of my personal predictions about the movie's plot were proven incorrect, as it's a lot less similar to the specifics of the Aligned backstory lore than the trailers initially made it appear to be. The broadest of broad strokes are similar of course, but so much of this movie's plot was either completely new or given a new spin.

I'm encouraged by the broadly good reception to the film among reviewers and fans who've seen it, but I must admit I don't get attaching much importance to the few negative reviews (especially on genre sites that, AFAIK, don't drive much public viewing choice). I'll only look at the broad trend, and maybe a few people whose tastes historically seem to be similar to mine if I'm on the fence. People can just... like what they like because it worked for them, or not? Lit-crit of why it's a good movie or otherwise can wait for afterwards.

All of which said, I'm looking forward to checking it out when it finally gets to the UK.

Sabrblade wrote:The way I see it, after seeing the movie for myself, the fans most likely to dislike this movie are those who feel strongly that The Transformers should be only ever be one particular way that should never be deviated from in their minds. Those with more open minds who are more accepting of different versions and different interpretations should easily be able to find this movie enjoyable.

I wasn't around when the original Bay 2007 movie was revealed and released. (I came back to the fandom only after ROTF.)

The shitshow in the forums must have been GLORIOUS.

It was something, and didn't help that there was a lot of edgy beefing-with-the-Don-Murphy-forum going on in the fandom.

-Kanrabat- wrote:

Sabrblade wrote:The way I see it, after seeing the movie for myself, the fans most likely to dislike this movie are those who feel strongly that The Transformers should be only ever be one particular way that should never be deviated from in their minds. Those with more open minds who are more accepting of different versions and different interpretations should easily be able to find this movie enjoyable.

I wasn't around when the original Bay 2007 movie was revealed and released. (I came back to the fandom only after ROTF.)

The shitshow in the forums must have been GLORIOUS.

lol, it was. It even got to the point that the owner of this site banned one of the producers.

Well Transformers One was finally seen by a slew of fans this week-end thanks to early screenings and here is our review for the film.

It is very tough to assess if this is the best Transformers film. We have the 86 film which was literally as G1 as it can get, if you want to go by a purist standpoint. We have Bumblebee, which was a very well made film on a smaller scale and we had the 2007 Michael Bay film which did an amazing job at showing the potential of the Transformers franchise on the big screen, focusing on scale and spectacle.

Now we have Transformers One which gives us "EVERTHING" (said in the style of Gary Oldman from Leon The Professional). So does that make it the best film? Maybe the best Transformers film? Well definitely the MOST Transformers film.

If people wanted a whole film that was like the beginning of the Bumblebee movie, this is not far from it. The art style is a bit different, but aside from that your wishes come true. And it's even more brutal and violent than that Bumblebee opening. You know what, I'll say this: Transformers One is as brutal and violent as any Michael Bay film. The big difference here though is that those responsible for the brutality are the villains and not Optimus Prime.

Overall, the second trailer gives you a good idea of what is to be expected in the film, with a progression of D-16 and Orion Pax starting as miners and then ending up "evolving" twice in the film to finally end up as Megatron and Optimus Prime. And that is both a positive and a negative.

Positive-wise, it means the film accomplishes its mission of telling an origin story for not just these characters but for their factions too within just one hour and a half. Negative-wise, it means a lot of story beats are rushed. Optimus goes from a guy who doesn't really respect the rules to the Optimus Prime we know in a few days while Megatron also goes through a significant change in parallel. So take that as you wish. I personally would have wanted more time spent on this, but I also recognize how efficient the story telling is to convey all this in a short movie for all ages.

The conflict at hand was presented in a new way and is probably the best aspect of the movie. The writers found a very clever way for Orion Pax' and D-16's views and outlooks on their world to be completely changed and it's in how they react to these revelations that we see how they go on different paths, which are familiar to any Transformers fans. It's almost maddening how this "kids film" is more mature, lore heavy, and has more depth than any of the live action films.

I mention Orion Pax and D-16 a lot because the movie really does revolve around them. Bumblebee and Elita are more one dimensional but to be faire though, we've never had two compelling character arcs in a Transformers movie ever. And while less main, Bumblebee and Elita are a fine addition to the mix. Believe it or not, Bumblebee's more humoristic personality is explained as a product of his environment and the "Badassitron" line actually has a payoff. Generally, I didn't care for the humour but it didn't take away any enjoyment of the film for me; you could easily move on from what didn't land. I also want to mention Jon Hamm's Sentinel Prime who was an excellent version of the character and the bot that surprised me most. Oh and Steve Buscemi as Starscream worked well, even though he doesn't change his voice much.

In terms of animation, this is peak Transformers. I really loved seeing the characters use their alt modes as part of their fighting styles and specific moves, like converting just some parts to use them offensively and then converting back. As a longtime Transformers fan, this was a beauty to behold.

Speaking more about the plot and characters would dive into spoiler territory so I will end the review here by saying that this is a great Transformers film, probably the best, and I encourage all Transformers fans to give it a watch.

It gets 4 golden Rodimus stickers out of 5. While great overall there were some story beats that were too rushed for me, especially in the third act, and I felt that did take away some enjoyment.





We thank Supreme Convoy for the thumbnail

william-james88 wrote:

-Kanrabat- wrote:

Sabrblade wrote:The way I see it, after seeing the movie for myself, the fans most likely to dislike this movie are those who feel strongly that The Transformers should be only ever be one particular way that should never be deviated from in their minds. Those with more open minds who are more accepting of different versions and different interpretations should easily be able to find this movie enjoyable.

I wasn't around when the original Bay 2007 movie was revealed and released. (I came back to the fandom only after ROTF.)

The shitshow in the forums must have been GLORIOUS.

lol, it was. It even got to the point that the owner of this site banned one of the producers.

Oh God, too bad I missed it.

I thought Transformers One was fun!

I was basically that Rick Dalton meme throughout the movie.

Supreme Convoy wrote:I thought Transformers One was fun!

I was basically that Rick Dalton meme throughout the movie.

Amazing, using that for the review cover.

I'm liking what I'm hearing, er reading. Looking foward to seeing it.

And which producer was banned? Was it Murphy?

-Kanrabat- wrote:

william-james88 wrote:

-Kanrabat- wrote:

Sabrblade wrote:The way I see it, after seeing the movie for myself, the fans most likely to dislike this movie are those who feel strongly that The Transformers should be only ever be one particular way that should never be deviated from in their minds. Those with more open minds who are more accepting of different versions and different interpretations should easily be able to find this movie enjoyable.

I wasn't around when the original Bay 2007 movie was revealed and released. (I came back to the fandom only after ROTF.)

The shitshow in the forums must have been GLORIOUS.

lol, it was. It even got to the point that the owner of this site banned one of the producers.

Oh God, too bad I missed it.

You ever read the initial reactions to Beast Wars that people had on ATT back in 1996? Madness. Absolute madness. And even throughout the show's run did some still whine that it wasn't like G1. Even when Starscream guest-starred and the Ark was found, it still wasn't enough for these people.

Combing through old ATT posts, I found one where the user was asking why Rhinox brought Optimus Primal back to life in "Coming of the Fuzors" instead of bringing back the spark of a G1 Autobot like Optimus Prime or Ironhide. Like, seriously? Why wouldn't Rhinox want to bring back one of his best friends? This person really was so hellbent on seeing more G1 characters come back in Beast Wars that he'd rather the show had forsaken its lead protagonist in favor of GEEWUN fan service.

And then there were the outlandish initial reactions (or "overreactions") to Beast Machines, which still continue to crop up every now and then to this day.

Sabrblade wrote:

-Kanrabat- wrote:

william-james88 wrote:

-Kanrabat- wrote:

Sabrblade wrote:The way I see it, after seeing the movie for myself, the fans most likely to dislike this movie are those who feel strongly that The Transformers should be only ever be one particular way that should never be deviated from in their minds. Those with more open minds who are more accepting of different versions and different interpretations should easily be able to find this movie enjoyable.

I wasn't around when the original Bay 2007 movie was revealed and released. (I came back to the fandom only after ROTF.)

The shitshow in the forums must have been GLORIOUS.

lol, it was. It even got to the point that the owner of this site banned one of the producers.

Oh God, too bad I missed it.

You ever read the initial reactions to Beast Wars that people had on ATT back in 1996? Madness. Absolute madness. And even throughout the show's run did some still whine that it wasn't like G1. Even when Starscream guest-starred and the Ark was found, it still wasn't enough for these people.

Combing through old ATT posts, I found one where the user was asking why Rhinox brought Optimus Primal back to life in "Coming of the Fuzors" instead of bringing back the spark of a G1 Autobot like Optimus Prime or Ironhide. Like, seriously? Why wouldn't Rhinox want to bring back one of his best friends? This person really was so hellbent on seeing more G1 characters come back in Beast Wars that he'd rather the show had forsaken its lead protagonist in favor of GEEWUN fan service.

And then there were the outlandish initial reactions (or "overreactions") to Beast Machines, which still continue to crop up every now and then to this day.

Some of that stuff is wild. I get not liking something, and certainly you have a right to critisise, (I didn't like the way Beast Machines handled Rhinox for example) but yeah. LIke the whole thing where people insist that that one writer said real hero's don't use guns, despite the fact that that's not what he said. Madness.

Sabrblade wrote:And then there were the outlandish initial reactions (or "overreactions") to Beast Machines, which still continue to crop up every now and then to this day.

As a casual fan, I was already used to the concept of multiple universes in TF for some time when I finally watched BW.

I found Beast Machines so bizarre and unnatural. Especially because for some reasons, the captured Megatron instantly conquered and transformed Cybertron so quickly and radically. As a direct sequel to Beast Wars, Beast Machines simply does not work.
But as its own closed universe, any and all plot holes become non-existent and everything works.

WFC already did some multiverse storytelling (I still have top see it( but I really want to see a series where Classic G1 bots meet and clashes with their Bayverse counterparts. And I mean the first trilogy Bayverse.

-Kanrabat- wrote:WFC already did some multiverse storytelling

Wait, what?

Sabrblade wrote:

-Kanrabat- wrote:WFC already did some multiverse storytelling

Wait, what?

"G1" and BW got mixed in the same universe, or rather, the same time period.
It's not really "multiverse", but it's kinda it.

A genuine "multiverse" story would be if Legacy got an anime.

-Kanrabat- wrote:

Sabrblade wrote:

-Kanrabat- wrote:WFC already did some multiverse storytelling

Wait, what?

"G1" and BW got mixed in the same universe, or rather, the same time period.
It's not really "multiverse", but it's kinda it.

That was just time travel, just like in the old Beast Wars cartoon.

Half way through, I already knew this was the greatest Transformers experience ever.

So, the trailers (and the movie itself, duh) showed what looked to be TF: Prime-styled Vehicons among the many background individuals seen in the movie. However, it turns out that they are not called "Vehicons" after all. This tweet from Blokees reveals what their actual name is:

https://twitter.com/BlokeesOfficial/status/1835505030201586162



They're "Death Trackers".

Appreciates the non-spoilery review, william-james88. I look forward to this one. I think I haven't looked forward to a TF movie as much as TF:1 since '07.

'86 will still be the most beloved of TF media, nothing can unseat my love for the voice casts and hand-drawn animation. But if TF:1 can unseat BBM & '07 for either #2/3, I couldn't be happier. Right off the bat I thought TF:1 was the right direction to take the franchise forward. With animation as the "bread and better" main events and standalone "character spotlight" movies like the BBM as supplemental side projects ( think Star Wars Sequels & the Rouge One/Solo movies as parallel).

I'm not even looking at '86 with rose-colored glasses of nostalgia. I didn't grow up with much access to G1 TV (and had 2 toys: Grimlock & Slag) & never saw the '86 movie until the 30th anniversary DVD came out. the '07 Bay movie was the came back to the franchise point and sinced I catch up on everything except the Japenese ones (thanks, YouTube, Tubi & Netflix... er... maybe not Netflix, LOL) for TV shows (still going through IDW, no access to Marvel/Dreamwave on the comics).

Sabrblade wrote:

-Kanrabat- wrote:

Sabrblade wrote:

-Kanrabat- wrote:WFC already did some multiverse storytelling

Wait, what?

"G1" and BW got mixed in the same universe, or rather, the same time period.
It's not really "multiverse", but it's kinda it.

That was just time travel, just like in the old Beast Wars cartoon.

Oh?
Because inside the cover of a Siege Select set (Space trooper or something) there was a map of all the planets and the "Beast planet" was one of them.

It is semantics but when one is travelling through space at ludicrous speed, they also time-travel. It's science.

4.5/5 feels right. I might have gone with 4, but this is fine. It was a fun movie and imo, did its job of being a kids movie extremely well.

The score and music have like 2 or 3 short cool parts and are otherwise entirely forgettable. To be fair to Brian Tyler, he was probably asked to make a score of Generic Drama Strings, but it feels like a missed opportunity to elevate a good movie even further. The end credits song was easily the most memorable thing.

Since it isn't on the internet for me to validate my ears, was the music during Alpha Trion's exposition dump about the Primes a riff on Jablonsky's score from RotF? It sounded familiar but this isn't an area where I trust myself to be correct.

ScottyP wrote:4.5/5 feels right. I might have gone with 4, but this is fine. It was a fun movie and imo, did its job of being a kids movie extremely well.

The score and music have like 2 or 3 short cool parts and are otherwise entirely forgettable. To be fair to Brian Tyler, he was probably asked to make a score of Generic Drama Strings, but it feels like a missed opportunity to elevate a good movie even further. The end credits song was easily the most memorable thing.

Since it isn't on the internet for me to validate my ears, was the music during Alpha Trion's exposition dump about the Primes a riff on Jablonsky's score from RotF? It sounded familiar but this isn't an area where I trust myself to be correct.

Yeah I was between 4 and 4.5. The score was definitely weak, I agree, nothing too memorable. People say they heard the score from the Prime show but I didn't. And I didn't hear Jablonksy score, but to be fair the only thing I think I'd recognize would be his Arrival track.

Blastback wrote:I'm liking what I'm hearing, er reading. Looking foward to seeing it.

And which producer was banned? Was it Murphy?

I think so, but am not 100% sure. This was before my time here.

-Kanrabat- wrote:

Sabrblade wrote:

-Kanrabat- wrote:

Sabrblade wrote:

-Kanrabat- wrote:WFC already did some multiverse storytelling

Wait, what?

"G1" and BW got mixed in the same universe, or rather, the same time period.
It's not really "multiverse", but it's kinda it.

That was just time travel, just like in the old Beast Wars cartoon.

Oh?
Because inside the cover of a Siege Select set (Space trooper or something) there was a map of all the planets and the "Beast planet" was one of them.

Don't know what that is, but the WFC cartoon went with the old "Maximals and Predacons travel back in time from Cybertron in the far future" that Beast Wars originally did. Guess you really do need to watch it, so that, if nothing else, you can know what all really happens in it and can form your own opinion of it (or, to also use it as a point of reference for how not to make a Transformers series whenever someone comes along and says they want "no humor" in Transformers).

william-james88 wrote:

Supreme Convoy wrote:I thought Transformers One was fun!

I was basically that Rick Dalton meme throughout the movie.

Amazing, using that for the review cover.

Ha! Glad folks like it.

william-james88 wrote:

Blastback wrote:I'm liking what I'm hearing, er reading. Looking foward to seeing it.

And which producer was banned? Was it Murphy?

I think so, but am not 100% sure. This was before my time here.

Yep, it was Murphy. Ancient history!

Do we know one way or another at this point if this is in-continuity with the live action movies? My guess would be it's not, but I haven't been able to find a confirmed answer online.

I guess Sentinel Prime's role in this movie could be a big tell given what we know about his character from DotM.

#1 Signal Lancer fan wrote:Do we know one way or another at this point if this is in-continuity with the live action movies? My guess would be it's not, but I haven't been able to find a confirmed answer online.

I guess Sentinel Prime's role in this movie could be a big tell given what we know about his character from DotM.

This will be easier to discuss once everyone has seen the movie, but for now I can say for certain that this movie is impossible to fit with either ROTF or DOTM. A sequel could potentially tie it back in with the 2007 movie at the very least, and possibly with Bumblebee and ROTB, but it's completely irreconcilable with the sequel films.

Producer Lorenzo di Bonaventura keeps giving conflicting information about this movie's relation to the live-action movies. For the longest time he kept saying it was a prequel to the live-action films, but then in a September 12 article on ComicBook.com, he said "I think it'd be really hard and complicated to have a direct link [to the live-action movies]," and "You want to do something different, and you also see where it can be successful. I think that's where the two universes help each other. You can see what works, and you can do that in either one. The fun of it for me, as a filmmaker, is keeping them separate."

This makes TF One sound like a separate continuity altogether. BUT THEN, in an article on ScreenRant that was published today, this was stated:

Screen Rant: Is Transformers One considered a prequel to the recent movies of Bumblebee and Rise of the Beast or the original live-action film starting in 2007? Or is it something completely, entirely new?

Lorenzo di Bonaventura: It obviously exists beforehand. I think we figured it out. It was like 300 million years before the first Michael Bay movie, so if that's a prequel, that's a prequel. But we're really following the lore about where it starts, and so we really just think about it as the beginning of the story. The origin, yes, but literally the beginning of the thing that we've all come to appreciate.

Make up you mind, Lorenzo!

At the moment, the 2007 movie seems to occupy two separate timelines: a "Sequel continuity" (2007 + ROTF to TLK) and a "Prequel continuity" (2007 + BB & ROTB), with TLK being the problematic one keeping all seven films from fitting together neatly.

Depending on what future developments are made by later movies, we could end up with any of the following situations:

• The films could continue on their respective paths with the current status quo of the live-action sequels, the live-action prequels, and TF One and its sequels all remaining separate from each other (this option feels the most likely to happen).
• A TF One sequel could work to reconnect it back with the 2007 movie and its two prequels, while remaining distinct from the live-action Sequel Continuity.
• A new live-action movie could jump through hoops to try and reconcile Bumblebee and ROTB with the live-action sequel movies, TLK included, leaving TF One and its sequels unable to reconnect with any of the live-action films at all.
• A combination of the second and third options, which would mean 2007, Bumblebee, and ROTB would occupy two timelines, one with the sequels (BB-ROTB-2007-ROTF-DOTM-AOE-TLK) and one with TF One (One-BB-ROTB-2007). This, however, is the messiest option, so we can only hope that this option does not happen.

#1 Signal Lancer fan wrote:Do we know one way or another at this point if this is in-continuity with the live action movies? My guess would be it's not, but I haven't been able to find a confirmed answer online.

I guess Sentinel Prime's role in this movie could be a big tell given what we know about his character from DotM.

DotM is the one big major problem. Without giving anything away, there are two major points of conflict, and one of those is even still a big issue even taking the continuity loosely and in broad strokes.

If you really dive into the details, TF One is its own thing right now. Probably has more in common with Aligned continuity than anything, but also borrows ideas from G1, Cybertron/Galaxy Force and others.

In other words, it's like Bumblebee and RotB. If you want it to count, don't think too hard about it (or at all, the producers didn't) and ignore one major thing with "eh something else happens later that we don't know about yet". If you don't want it to be in continuity, ok, you can assume it isn't and it won't impact your enjoyment.

ScottyP wrote:but also borrows ideas from G1, Cybertron/Galaxy Force and others.

The Cybertron/Galaxy Force bit is exciting. While I recognize how flawed it is, Cybertron is one of my favorite Transformers cartoons.

#1 Signal Lancer fan wrote:

ScottyP wrote:but also borrows ideas from G1, Cybertron/Galaxy Force and others.

The Cybertron/Galaxy Force bit is exciting. While I recognize how flawed it is, Cybertron is one of my favorite Transformers cartoons.

Having seen the movie myself, I'm honestly not quite sure what Scotty is referring to, specifically, in regards to the movie borrowing from Cybertron. Sure, there might be something in there, but I don't recall anything major from it being in the movie.

Sabrblade wrote:

#1 Signal Lancer fan wrote:

ScottyP wrote:but also borrows ideas from G1, Cybertron/Galaxy Force and others.

The Cybertron/Galaxy Force bit is exciting. While I recognize how flawed it is, Cybertron is one of my favorite Transformers cartoons.

Having seen the movie myself, I'm honestly not quite sure what Scotty is referring to, specifically, in regards to the movie borrowing from Cybertron. Sure, there might be something in there, but I don't recall anything major from it being in the movie.

It is very quick, temper expectations Signal Lancer! Sabr - Big Primus robot mode for Cybertron is what I was alluding to.

ScottyP wrote:

Sabrblade wrote:

#1 Signal Lancer fan wrote:

ScottyP wrote:but also borrows ideas from G1, Cybertron/Galaxy Force and others.

The Cybertron/Galaxy Force bit is exciting. While I recognize how flawed it is, Cybertron is one of my favorite Transformers cartoons.

Having seen the movie myself, I'm honestly not quite sure what Scotty is referring to, specifically, in regards to the movie borrowing from Cybertron. Sure, there might be something in there, but I don't recall anything major from it being in the movie.

It is very quick, temper expectations Signal Lancer! Sabr - Big Primus robot mode for Cybertron is what I was alluding to.

Oh, that. Yeah, I can see that as a Cybertron reference.