The Energon Pub

News Credits: 2 · by **Shadowman** » Sat Jan 08, 2011 5:44 pm

SlyTF1 wrote:Like, @$$? Or 5417!?

Christ, I didn't just teach you to do it, did I? People of Seibertron, for what it's worth, please accept my sincerest apologies. I didn't realize I would cause another outbreak of the 1337 virus on our community.

News Credits: 37 · by **SlyTF1** » Sat Jan 08, 2011 5:54 pm

Shadowman wrote:
SlyTF1 wrote:Like, @$$? Or 5417!?

Christ, I didn't just teach you to do it, did I? People of Seibertron, for what it's worth, please accept my sincerest apologies. I didn't realize I would cause another outbreak of the 1337 virus on our community.

No, I'm ok. I've been using @$$ since forever.

News Credits: 2 · by **Shadowman** » Sat Jan 08, 2011 5:58 pm

SlyTF1 wrote:
Shadowman wrote:
SlyTF1 wrote:Like, @$$? Or 5417!?

Christ, I didn't just teach you to do it, did I? People of Seibertron, for what it's worth, please accept my sincerest apologies. I didn't realize I would cause another outbreak of the 1337 virus on our community.

No, I'm ok. I've been using @$$ since forever.

Well stop using it! I've lost friends and family to the 1337 virus!

News Credits: 37 · by **SlyTF1** » Sat Jan 08, 2011 6:00 pm

Shadowman wrote:
SlyTF1 wrote:
Shadowman wrote:
SlyTF1 wrote:Like, @$$? Or 5417!?

Christ, I didn't just teach you to do it, did I? People of Seibertron, for what it's worth, please accept my sincerest apologies. I didn't realize I would cause another outbreak of the 1337 virus on our community.

No, I'm ok. I've been using @$$ since forever.

Well stop using it! I've lost friends and family to the 1337 virus!

O rly?

News Credits: 226 · by **Burn** » Sat Jan 08, 2011 6:12 pm

I've been using my arse since forever too.

by **OptiMagnus** » Sun Jan 09, 2011 12:51 pm

I come back to this after twenty-four hours and I have no idea what the slag is going on here.
Honestly, this thread gets weirder by the day.

News Credits: 37 · by **SlyTF1** » Sun Jan 09, 2011 3:08 pm

OptiMagnus10 wrote:I come back to this after twenty-four hours and I have no idea what the slag is going on here.
Honestly, this thread gets weirder by the day.

Well, to set your mind at ease about this thread:

I just ran into this guy on a DOTM trailer on You Tube and he thinks that these movies are associated with G1. What a dumbass! He was complaining about ROTF having plot holes that contradict the G1 story, I explained to him that it isn't G1. He was complaining that the Constructicons formed Devastator in G1, and he was trying to convince me that the Constructicons form Devastator in ROTF even though they are seen after Devastator is destroyed. I explained to him that it the movies aren't G1, and that Devastator and the Constructicons where not the same thing. He hasn't replied since! Got his ass!!!

by **ClintF** » Sun Jan 09, 2011 3:38 pm

lol, small world, i just replied to your comments on youtube when you were arguing with the guy about Devastator. I was the one that mentioned The Ark being in the trailer when you said these films have nothing to do with G1.

News Credits: 22 · by **Rodimus Prime** » Sun Jan 09, 2011 3:44 pm

Burn wrote:I've been using my arse since forever too.

I've only been using mine for 28 years, 4 months and 9 days...

And did I mention I'm uber 1337?

by **Joker'sRequiem** » Sun Jan 09, 2011 3:58 pm

SlyTF1 wrote:Devastator and the Constructicons where not the same thing.

That's not an entirely true statement. The components that formed Devastator were in fact Constructicons. It just so happens that in ROTF, Constructicons are also present in the battle in Egypt as individual, non-combining robots. So, in the Movie-continuity, some Constructicons are combiners, while others, who are seemingly identical in body-type, are simply regular Transformers.

Basically, all of Devastator's components=Constructicons, but not all Constructicons=Devastator components.

by **ClintF** » Sun Jan 09, 2011 4:21 pm

Joker'sRequiem wrote:Basically, all of Devastator's components=Constructicons, but not all Constructicons=Devastator components.

Well put

News Credits: 37 · by **SlyTF1** » Sun Jan 09, 2011 4:48 pm

ClintF wrote:lol, small world, i just replied to your comments on youtube when you were arguing with the guy about Devastator. I was the one that mentioned The Ark being in the trailer when you said these films have nothing to do with G1.

O rly? Oh the irony...if you can call it that. Maybe it's just convenience. :-?

by **Evil_the_Nub** » Sun Jan 09, 2011 5:13 pm

Joker'sRequiem wrote:
SlyTF1 wrote:Devastator and the Constructicons where not the same thing.

That's not an entirely true statement. The components that formed Devastator were in fact Constructicons. It just so happens that in ROTF, Constructicons are also present in the battle in Egypt as individual, non-combining robots. So, in the Movie-continuity, some Constructicons are combiners, while others, who are seemingly identical in body-type, are simply regular Transformers.

Basically, all of Devastator's components=Constructicons, but not all Constructicons=Devastator components.

What makes the most sense to me is the vehicles that form Devastator are just that. No robot modes just a group of vehicles that make one robot, like Tidal Wave.

by **Joker'sRequiem** » Sun Jan 09, 2011 5:19 pm

Evil_the_Nub wrote:
Joker'sRequiem wrote:
SlyTF1 wrote:Devastator and the Constructicons where not the same thing.

That's not an entirely true statement. The components that formed Devastator were in fact Constructicons. It just so happens that in ROTF, Constructicons are also present in the battle in Egypt as individual, non-combining robots. So, in the Movie-continuity, some Constructicons are combiners, while others, who are seemingly identical in body-type, are simply regular Transformers.

Basically, all of Devastator's components=Constructicons, but not all Constructicons=Devastator components.

What makes the most sense to me is the vehicles that form Devastator are just that. No robot modes just a group of vehicles that make one robot, like Tidal Wave.

That's pretty much how I see it, too. Since they don't confirm whether or not Devastator's components can combine, I've always just treated them as vehicles without robot modes. Although it is nice to think they still fit the vehicle to robot to giant combined robot theme...

News Credits: 37 · by **SlyTF1** » Sun Jan 09, 2011 8:14 pm

The guy just replied to me. He still is saying that G1 and the movies are connected. And he also told me that the only reason I liked ROTF is because I don't think. I have something for his ass!

News Credits: 2 · by **Shadowman** » Sun Jan 09, 2011 8:17 pm

SlyTF1 wrote:The guy just replied to me. He still is saying that G1 and the movies are connected.

Link him to the Transformers wiki. Hell, link him here.

SlyTF1 wrote:And he also told me that the only reason I liked ROTF is because I don't think.

Don't worry, your inability to think can't possibly have an impact on your opinions.

SlyTF1 wrote:I have something for his ass!

I recommend never, ever saying that again.

News Credits: 37 · by **SlyTF1** » Sun Jan 09, 2011 8:19 pm

Shadowman wrote:
SlyTF1 wrote:The guy just replied to me. He still is saying that G1 and the movies are connected.

Link him to the Transformers wiki. Hell, link him here.

SlyTF1 wrote:And he also told me that the only reason I liked ROTF is because I don't think.

Don't worry, your inability to think can't possibly have an impact on your opinions.

SlyTF1 wrote:I have something for his ass!

I recommend never, ever saying that again.

LOL! Not literally...

Besides, the reason I love ROTF more than an average fan of the movie is because I DO think. I analyze ever tiny bit of the movie and make connections. I do that with every movie and video game.

News Credits: 2 · by **Shadowman** » Sun Jan 09, 2011 8:48 pm

SlyTF1 wrote:Besides, the reason I love ROTF more than an average fan of the movie is because I DO think. I analyze ever tiny bit of the movie and make connections. I do that with every movie and video game.

Then you must have a different way of analyzing it, because looking too closely into it tends to cause people to hate the movies. (How did they walk out of the Smithsonian in DC and end up in Arizona?)

News Credits: 37 · by **SlyTF1** » Sun Jan 09, 2011 8:57 pm

Shadowman wrote:
SlyTF1 wrote:Besides, the reason I love ROTF more than an average fan of the movie is because I DO think. I analyze ever tiny bit of the movie and make connections. I do that with every movie and video game.

Then you must have a different way of analyzing it, because looking too closely into it tends to cause people to hate the movies. (How did they walk out of the Smithsonian in DC and end up in Arizona?)

Because it's called fiction.

News Credits: 2 · by **Shadowman** » Sun Jan 09, 2011 9:10 pm

SlyTF1 wrote:
Shadowman wrote:
SlyTF1 wrote:Besides, the reason I love ROTF more than an average fan of the movie is because I DO think. I analyze ever tiny bit of the movie and make connections. I do that with every movie and video game.

Then you must have a different way of analyzing it, because looking too closely into it tends to cause people to hate the movies. (How did they walk out of the Smithsonian in DC and end up in Arizona?)

Because it's called fiction.

But then that's not over analyzing. Even so, being fiction does not give a story instant forgiveness for plot holes like that.

by **OptiMagnus** » Sun Jan 09, 2011 9:20 pm

Shadowman wrote:
SlyTF1 wrote:
Shadowman wrote:
SlyTF1 wrote:Besides, the reason I love ROTF more than an average fan of the movie is because I DO think. I analyze ever tiny bit of the movie and make connections. I do that with every movie and video game.

Then you must have a different way of analyzing it, because looking too closely into it tends to cause people to hate the movies. (How did they walk out of the Smithsonian in DC and end up in Arizona?)

Because it's called fiction.

But then that's not over analyzing. Even so, being fiction does not give a story instant forgiveness for plot holes like that.

But do little things like that really ruin the entire movie? All I really care about is the storyline and the characters.

News Credits: 37 · by **SlyTF1** » Sun Jan 09, 2011 9:23 pm

OptiMagnus10 wrote:
Shadowman wrote:
SlyTF1 wrote:
Shadowman wrote:
SlyTF1 wrote:Besides, the reason I love ROTF more than an average fan of the movie is because I DO think. I analyze ever tiny bit of the movie and make connections. I do that with every movie and video game.

Then you must have a different way of analyzing it, because looking too closely into it tends to cause people to hate the movies. (How did they walk out of the Smithsonian in DC and end up in Arizona?)

Because it's called fiction.

But then that's not over analyzing. Even so, being fiction does not give a story instant forgiveness for plot holes like that.

But do little things like that really ruin the entire movie? All I really care about is the storyline and the characters.

And all I really care about is the explosions. If you want a story, read a book, and if you want interactive...ness and depth, play a video game.

by **OptiMagnus** » Sun Jan 09, 2011 9:33 pm

SlyTF1 wrote:
OptiMagnus10 wrote:
Shadowman wrote:
SlyTF1 wrote:
Shadowman wrote:
SlyTF1 wrote:Besides, the reason I love ROTF more than an average fan of the movie is because I DO think. I analyze ever tiny bit of the movie and make connections. I do that with every movie and video game.

Then you must have a different way of analyzing it, because looking too closely into it tends to cause people to hate the movies. (How did they walk out of the Smithsonian in DC and end up in Arizona?)

Because it's called fiction.

But then that's not over analyzing. Even so, being fiction does not give a story instant forgiveness for plot holes like that.

But do little things like that really ruin the entire movie? All I really care about is the storyline and the characters.

And all I really care about is the explosions. If you want a story, read a book, and if you want interactive...ness and depth, play a video game.

I thought ROTF had a good storyline though. And good explosions...and lots of them. I love explosions, and that's why I pay good money to see and purchase Michael Bay movies and play TF and other combat video games (like Call of Duty, MAG, HAWX, WFC, etc)

News Credits: 37 · by **SlyTF1** » Sun Jan 09, 2011 9:40 pm

OptiMagnus10 wrote:
SlyTF1 wrote:
OptiMagnus10 wrote:
Shadowman wrote:
SlyTF1 wrote:
Shadowman wrote:
SlyTF1 wrote:Besides, the reason I love ROTF more than an average fan of the movie is because I DO think. I analyze ever tiny bit of the movie and make connections. I do that with every movie and video game.

Then you must have a different way of analyzing it, because looking too closely into it tends to cause people to hate the movies. (How did they walk out of the Smithsonian in DC and end up in Arizona?)

Because it's called fiction.

But then that's not over analyzing. Even so, being fiction does not give a story instant forgiveness for plot holes like that.

But do little things like that really ruin the entire movie? All I really care about is the storyline and the characters.

And all I really care about is the explosions. If you want a story, read a book, and if you want interactive...ness and depth, play a video game.

I thought ROTF had a good storyline though. And good explosions...and lots of them. I love explosions, and that's why I pay good money to see and purchase Michael Bay movies and play TF and other combat video games (like Call of Duty, MAG, HAWX, WFC, etc)

I liked the story in ROTF too. There just aren't many stories that I care about. Anything that has to do with any kind of alien/gov't conspiracy is really the only type of story I care about.

by **OptiMagnus** » Sun Jan 09, 2011 9:46 pm

SlyTF1 wrote:
OptiMagnus10 wrote:
SlyTF1 wrote:
OptiMagnus10 wrote:
Shadowman wrote:
SlyTF1 wrote:
Shadowman wrote:
SlyTF1 wrote:Besides, the reason I love ROTF more than an average fan of the movie is because I DO think. I analyze ever tiny bit of the movie and make connections. I do that with every movie and video game.

Then you must have a different way of analyzing it, because looking too closely into it tends to cause people to hate the movies. (How did they walk out of the Smithsonian in DC and end up in Arizona?)

Because it's called fiction.

But then that's not over analyzing. Even so, being fiction does not give a story instant forgiveness for plot holes like that.

But do little things like that really ruin the entire movie? All I really care about is the storyline and the characters.

And all I really care about is the explosions. If you want a story, read a book, and if you want interactive...ness and depth, play a video game.

I thought ROTF had a good storyline though. And good explosions...and lots of them. I love explosions, and that's why I pay good money to see and purchase Michael Bay movies and play TF and other combat video games (like Call of Duty, MAG, HAWX, WFC, etc)

I liked the story in ROTF too. There just aren't many stories that I care about. Anything that has to do with any kind of alien/gov't conspiracy is really the only type of story I care about.

I used to like alien movies but everything looks the same to me nowadays. Although I always watch stuff on History or Discovery or whatever obout alien cover-ups.