Mkall wrote:To me, the FoC line looks like it was designed to be a pure filler line and thus not a lot of time or money went into them.
paul053 wrote:Mkall wrote:To me, the FoC line looks like it was designed to be a pure filler line and thus not a lot of time or money went into them.
WFC is also a filler line and only contains four figures. And most of them are awesome besides Bee. DOTM is the main line and we all know what happened.
We need more filler lines like RTS.
Mkall wrote:To me, the FoC line looks like it was designed to be a pure filler line and thus not a lot of time or money went into them. Maybe Hasbro isn't expecting many people to buy them? Maybe Hasbro feels it's more of an obligation to make figures to go along with the video game? Or maybe Hasbro is in worse straights that they let on.
All I know is that if they do more neo-G1 figs in this crappy manner, then things are going to get tense.
Geekee1 wrote:Don't forget that "Classics" was also a filler line.
Drift082111 wrote:I actually like them. I think someone mentioned how the Optimus has a 'cleaner' mold on another thread. These figures aren't as complicated, but they are still nice IMO. Looking forward to getting Jazz.
Mkall wrote:Geekee1 wrote:Don't forget that "Classics" was also a filler line.
The original Classics line came out in 2005, 7 years ago. There's no point in comparing the due to all the things that have changed since then.
Geekee1 wrote:Mkall wrote:Geekee1 wrote:Don't forget that "Classics" was also a filler line.
The original Classics line came out in 2005, 7 years ago. There's no point in comparing the due to all the things that have changed since then.
No it's perfectly fair. Just because time has passed doesn't give them license to create an inferior produce just because it's "filler".
Mkall wrote:Geekee1 wrote:Mkall wrote:Geekee1 wrote:Don't forget that "Classics" was also a filler line.
The original Classics line came out in 2005, 7 years ago. There's no point in comparing the due to all the things that have changed since then.
No it's perfectly fair. Just because time has passed doesn't give them license to create an inferior produce just because it's "filler".
Ahh, that's the angle you were coming from. I saw it differently. In which case, I totally agree with you.
Mkall wrote:Geekee1 wrote:Don't forget that "Classics" was also a filler line.
The original Classics line came out in 2005, 7 years ago. There's no point in comparing the due to all the things that have changed since then.
gavinfuzzy wrote:Mkall wrote:Geekee1 wrote:Don't forget that "Classics" was also a filler line.
The original Classics line came out in 2005, 7 years ago. There's no point in comparing the due to all the things that have changed since then.
No one seems to mind that the Classics Seeker mold is the size of a PRID figure.
breakdown99 wrote:FoC? Fall of Cybertron? Oh, now I get it...
Judging by all the products that have been released so far, I thought it was F*** off Consumers...
Return to Transformers Toys Discussion
Registered users: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot], SkyFire Prime, Yahoo [Bot]