The Energon Pub

News Credits: 387 · by **Nekoman** » Sat Aug 22, 2009 1:48 pm

Want to see what director Micheal Bay's up to? Well, you probably do. On the Victoria's Secret Facebook page, images from the set of this year's holiday TV spot have been posted. The spot was directed by Bay himself and has finished filming. To see all the images, click here, though please keep in mind the images may not be safe for all working environments.

News Credits: 1014 · by **First Gen** » Sat Aug 22, 2009 2:08 pm

Also, if you have a girlfriend/fiancee/wife thats on your computer too, either clear the history or don't visit this. It may get you in trouble.

News Credits: 6 · by **Jacob P. Galvatron** » Sat Aug 22, 2009 3:05 pm

Hot damn.
I wonder how many of those women will blow up.

News Credits: 402 · by **Mkall** » Sat Aug 22, 2009 3:10 pm

Jacob P. Galvatron wrote:Hot damn.
I wonder how many of those women will blow up.

Or are secretly Robots in Disguise?

News Credits: 2 · by **Convotron** » Sat Aug 22, 2009 3:13 pm

Mkall wrote:
Jacob P. Galvatron wrote:Hot damn.
I wonder how many of those women will blow up.

Or are secretly Robots in Disguise?

Or both?

Transf-*BOOM*

News Credits: 2 · by **Tekka** » Sat Aug 22, 2009 3:17 pm

Exploding Lingerie!

News Credits: 1 · by **cybercat** » Sat Aug 22, 2009 5:12 pm

Potentially bringing an entirely new meaning to "Baygasm".

HK, sigh.

News Credits: 22 · by **Rodimus Prime** » Sat Aug 22, 2009 5:28 pm

hellkitty wrote:Potentially bringing an entirely new meaning to "Baygasm".

Until I read that, I was going to ignore this thread...

by **RiddlerJ** » Sat Aug 22, 2009 7:06 pm

He'll then add some explosions and a shot of some random junkformers and Transformers 3 will be done and all the 15 year olds will love it.

News Credits: 1 · by **shonenfan4** » Sat Aug 22, 2009 7:21 pm

Jacob P. Galvatron wrote:Hot damn.
I wonder how many of those women will blow up.

I lold at that, and this is def not work safe :lol:

by **agent1159** » Sat Aug 22, 2009 9:42 pm

this is of course assuming you can even see what the heck is going on with his trademark "blair witch" shooting style..

then again he does try harder when its M. fox running or sitting on a bike... surprisingly the camera is actually steadier... hmmmm

by **Heckfire** » Sat Aug 22, 2009 11:10 pm

agent1159 wrote:this is of course assuming you can even see what the heck is going on with his trademark "blair witch" shooting style..

then again he does try harder when its M. fox running or sitting on a bike... surprisingly the camera is actually steadier... hmmmm

It's easier to use the steadicam one-handed..?

News Credits: 8 · by **Megatron Wolf** » Sun Aug 23, 2009 2:06 am

Dear god here come the worst VC comercial to ever be made. Wonder how many explosions he gonna fit in? I forsee a giant explosion then the camera pans up to see its in the shape of a bra. Then a 2 sec shot of a chick in bra saying the name and then over.

News Credits: 4 · by **tom brokaw** » Mon Aug 24, 2009 4:32 am

very nice

News Credits: 1 · by **cybercat** » Thu Aug 27, 2009 10:35 pm

Megatron Wolf wrote:Dear god here come the worst VC comercial to ever be made. Wonder how many explosions he gonna fit in? I forsee a giant explosion then the camera pans up to see its in the shape of a bra. Then a 2 sec shot of a chick in bra saying the name and then over.

Naaaah. From his 'oeuvre' I have to say Bay doesn't seem to be a big fan of women actually *talking*. Let's look at ROTF: Running, yes. Changing clothes in public, yes. Spinny cam, yes. Running in heels, yes. Sitting skeezily straddled on motorbike, yes. Angry walking, yes. Pouting moodily, yes. All of these, it disgusts me to admit, are already about 75% of the lingerie commercial cliche.

Talking, though? Not so much.

HK, just add pink and feathers. Pink feathers. (And explosions. Of pink feathers).