The Energon Pub

News Credits: 42 · Fri Sep 11, 2009 2:08 pm

Quesion as above ^^, reposted the tourneys forum is broked.

Gimmie a 'Yay' or 'Nay'.

News Credits: 1 · Fri Sep 11, 2009 2:41 pm

Hell yeah!

News Credits: 3 · Fri Sep 11, 2009 3:46 pm

I'd prefer that missions be added at that level myself, but if MP hasn't found a way to fix that particular bug, then I'm all for a Round Three.

News Credits: 226 · Fri Sep 11, 2009 3:55 pm

Archanubis wrote:I'd prefer that missions be added at that level myself, but if MP hasn't found a way to fix that particular bug, then I'm all for a Round Three.

Moggy is not touching the current version of the game, never will. Newer levels are never going to happen.

As for Round 3, meh. Doesn't bother me one way or another.

Sat Sep 12, 2009 12:50 am

Burn wrote:
Archanubis wrote:I'd prefer that missions be added at that level myself, but if MP hasn't found a way to fix that particular bug, then I'm all for a Round Three.

Moggy is not touching the current version of the game, never will. Newer levels are never going to happen.

As for Round 3, meh. Doesn't bother me one way or another.

Arrrgghhh!! This is driving me nuts. Ultra Magnus now has 1 million extra XP at L4. Three of my other bots are not far behind. I know that looking at the code would give me an unfair advantage (or at least that would be the perception), but for GOD'S SAKE MAN!!! HMW2 I speculate will still take a while, even under the best of circumstances. I can't help but think the L2-L4 missions could be changed to L2-L5. This would breathe a few months of life into HMW1 until HMW2 is out.

Please, for the LOVE OF GOD!!!!! LET ME SEE A COPY OF THE DB SCHEMA!!!!

I am stuck and burning in stagnant HMW1 HELL!!!!!! :sad:

oh..uh..also yeah... Round 3 would be OK I guess. I don't think increasing the level to 8 will make it any more interesting.

News Credits: 226 · Sat Sep 12, 2009 12:52 am

revengeofstarscream wrote:Please, for the LOVE OF GOD!!!!! LET ME SEE A COPY OF THE DB SCHEMA!!!!

Not my call man.

-edit-

You know, i'm not sure what turning a level 2-4 mission into 2-5 would achieve. I just checked out your logs, you rarely enter missions anyway.

So let me put this to you, if you REALLY want to help this game (for all) then join in the 2-4 missions some more.

If we see more of the "higher levels" in the missions we might actually be able to run a mission based tournament with awards for "most xp" etc given out.

Sat Sep 12, 2009 5:03 am

I choose to give an "Or".

But I suppose a yeah is in order. The last one was fun!

News Credits: 1 · Sat Sep 12, 2009 7:53 am

Either way I don't care

News Credits: 4 · Sat Sep 12, 2009 1:25 pm

I'll participate again

Sun Sep 13, 2009 5:39 pm

I wouldn't mind, the armor cost is a little high though.....

News Credits: 42 · Mon Sep 14, 2009 3:39 am

Bloodlust wrote:I wouldn't mind, the armour cost is a little high though.....

Win more fights?

News Credits: 3 · Mon Sep 14, 2009 10:57 am

Bloodlust wrote:I wouldn't mind, the armor cost is a little high though.....

That's what the other 11 combatants are for.

Mon Sep 14, 2009 5:14 pm

I dunno, I might play a 3rd round.

I don't have my computer right now, Just got my wife's laptop, had to donate my computer to my bands house to finish our second album.

so unless the 3rd round has something great in store for us, like missions, or giving a group of 5 or 6 of our bots level 7 or 8 to give us a group to work with in the arena, then I doubt anyone is going to be truly excited about a round 3.

Mon Sep 14, 2009 5:56 pm

Psychout wrote:
Bloodlust wrote:I wouldn't mind, the armour cost is a little high though.....
Win more fights?

You know, for some reason I couldn't win crap against those stupid strafers with 6 courage.....ughhhh, I had more luck against RoS than other people, and I never got to go against Dcybertron

Also Armor is also correct, that's right, spell checked it an everything!

News Credits: 3 · Mon Sep 14, 2009 6:17 pm

Bloodlust wrote:Also Armor is also correct, that's right, spell checked it an everything!

The British have a different way of spelling than Americans. They add extra, unneccessary letters to most of their words.

News Credits: 1 · Mon Sep 14, 2009 6:41 pm

Archanubis wrote:
Bloodlust wrote:Also Armor is also correct, that's right, spell checked it an everything!

The British have a different way of spelling than Americans. They add extra, unneccessary letters to most of their words.

Then they have the nerve to tell us we're spelling our own language wrong. Who do you limey brits think invented english! That's right, it was the Americans!

Well... technically it was the germans since it's a german root, unlike gaelic

News Credits: 42 · Mon Sep 14, 2009 6:50 pm

Archanubis wrote:The British spell differently to the Americans. They add extra, correct letters to most of their words.

Different sentense structure too, apparently.

Reading this place truly is painful at times. :lol:

AZ wrote:Well... technically it was the germans since it's a german root, unlike gaelic

But oddly, those were the bits you kept. Its the latin parts, primarily the ou that you guys dropped.

News Credits: 1 · Mon Sep 14, 2009 6:58 pm

Psychout wrote:
Archanubis wrote:The British spell differently to the Americans. They add extra, correct letters to most of their words.
Different sentense structure too, apparently.

Reading this place truly is painful at times.

That has nothing to do with American or Brittish English. It has everything to do with the internet.

*edit* Shouldn't that be corrected to "The British spell differently than the Americans"? Since it's a comparison?

Psychout wrote:
AZ wrote:Well... technically it was the germans since it's a german root, unlike gaelic
But oddly, those were the bits you kept. Its the latin parts, primarily the ou that you guys dropped.

Because we weren't invaded by France!

News Credits: 42 · Mon Sep 14, 2009 7:03 pm

Absolute Zero wrote:
Psychout wrote:
AZ wrote:Well... technically it was the germans since it's a german root, unlike gaelic
But oddly, those were the bits you kept. Its the latin parts, primarily the ou that you guys dropped.

Because we weren't invaded by France!

Nope, you teamed up with them instead. :lol:

News Credits: 1 · Mon Sep 14, 2009 7:17 pm

Psychout wrote:
Absolute Zero wrote:
Psychout wrote:
AZ wrote:Well... technically it was the germans since it's a german root, unlike gaelic
But oddly, those were the bits you kept. Its the latin parts, primarily the ou that you guys dropped.

Because we weren't invaded by France!
Nope, you teamed up with them instead.

And we kicked your ass. Twice. :grin:

Then we saved you both, twice. Superior fire power wins every time. Thus our motto of "Talk loudly, carry a fatboy."

News Credits: 3 · Mon Sep 14, 2009 7:50 pm

Absolute Zero wrote:And we kicked your ass. Twice.

To be fair, we beat them once, then tied them in the next war. Of course, they were on a losing streak towards the end there - beat Napoleon, but still couldn't beat a bunch of rifle packin' backswoodsmen.

News Credits: 1 · Mon Sep 14, 2009 7:55 pm

Archanubis wrote:
Absolute Zero wrote:And we kicked your ass. Twice.

To be fair, we beat them once, then tied them in the next war. Of course, they were on a losing streak towards the end there - beat Napoleon, but still couldn't beat a bunch of rifle packin' backswoodsmen.

To be fair, they lost to the Irish 4 or 5 times as well. I suppose that's what you get when you tax the countries guiness.

Mon Sep 14, 2009 8:40 pm

Wow, all of this over an OU?

Sigh, I knew he was spelling the British way, I just didn't want to put that there, but since you guys started it....

BTW how much in your tax money goes to the Queen?

You have got to give it to the Brits, they've stuck it out with us in Afghanistan though.

Personally, I think we took the British language and made it BETTER, because who still uses Latin anyways?

The Italians speak Italian, not Latin

News Credits: 226 · Mon Sep 14, 2009 11:48 pm

Stone the flamin' crows, all this racket over a bit of lingo?

Fair suck of the source bottle fellas! Only a drongo would have trouble working out what the bloke's on about anyway!
Now I bet you're all happy I turn the Aussie slang off when I post.

Tue Sep 15, 2009 2:21 am

Burn wrote:Stone the flamin' crows, all this racket over a bit of lingo?

Fair suck of the source bottle fellas! Only a drongo would have trouble working out what the bloke's on about anyway!
Now I bet you're all happy I turn the Aussie slang off when I post.

Nah, it's quite entertaining!

Kinda use to it since normally whenever I'm on XBOX live I play with the Aussies a lot....