Dreadwind wrote:RID_reborn wrote:which is why I don't really enforce it with Decepticons. If you're a con, you can get me to sell it for free. If you're a bot, tough luck.
anyhow, I"m not arguing anymore, not with Burn, not with anyone else. I'm here to sell weapons, not debate HMW philosophy.
I think you're missing a key point Burn was trying to make. The weapons aren't yours. They belong to the site. There for, you're not legally allowed to make a profit from it. COmparing it to selling Anime you -bought- is assanine. You paid -real- money for the anime, you own it (Well, depending on the laws there). You didn't pay real money for the weapons in the game. You don't pay real money for the game. Basically, you're attempting to scam real things for things you don't own. I'm pretty sure people have been banned from here for less then that. The best thing you could ask for is for them to donate energon to you, but then again, what would be the point? You'd get energon for selling the weapons.
The point of asking for an energon donation in exchange for the weapon is this Dreadwind. When you buy a weapon and sell it in game, regardless of whether it's been 5 seconds or 5 months you immediatly take a percentage loss on said weapon. I don't think it's that much to ask (and normally I don't ask for it) that you make the money back that you lost in the transaction.
As far as Sil is concerned an art trade is roughly the same as asking say (randomly picking an artist as an example) Charger for a trade: a picture of a fancharector in exchange for some Battle Blades for him. As long as both parties consider this fair what's the big deal?
However I do see what Burn's saying for the subscriptions, as they cost actual real money. But again, if both parties consider this to be a fair trade and it's ok with the mods what's the big deal?
*edit*
Just read Mkall's post. The mods aren't ok with monitary transactions. But having not previously known that I don't think anyone should be punished for it.