The Energon Pub

News Credits: 402 · by **Mkall** » Sat Nov 10, 2007 8:44 pm

Shujjah, you have to realize that this website is owned and visited by mainly Western World inhabitants, whose traditions are not as rigid as your culture's. Therefore what we call decent is probably not so to you. I'm sorry if all it takes for you to leave is one sig, but to the majority of the site's visitors, that sig is perfectly decent, well within the site's PG-13 rating.

It's something you'll have to get used to if you foray around the Internet. If you think the sigs here are too offencive, than you've precluded yourself from at least 70% of the Internet.

by **Carnosaur** » Sun Nov 11, 2007 12:22 am

he right

by **DtreetViper2** » Sun Nov 11, 2007 12:26 am

There has been worse sigs on the forums.

News Credits: 2 · by **Wingspan** » Sun Nov 11, 2007 12:53 am

Firefox + Adblock Plus + Right Click -> Copy Image Location = No naughty naughty.

Selective browsing. MySpace hates me for it. So do Burn's signatures now

. No offense meant on that Burn (I did enjoy the Cartman Yoda).

Be who you will, and be responsible for it; but don't run when your ideology or perspectives are confronted, find a smart way to engage it.

by **Shujjah** » Sun Nov 11, 2007 1:15 am

Mkall wrote:Shujjah, you have to realize that this website is owned and visited by mainly Western World inhabitants, whose traditions are not as rigid as your culture's. Therefore what we call decent is probably not so to you. I'm sorry if all it takes for you to leave is one sig, but to the majority of the site's visitors, that sig is perfectly decent, well within the site's PG-13 rating.

It's something you'll have to get used to if you foray around the Internet. If you think the sigs here are too offencive, than you've precluded yourself from at least 70% of the Internet.

thanks i think that is the case anyways i dont i think Burn's sig is ok now no worries

i have firefox now how to block images with it?

News Credits: 2 · by **Wingspan** » Sun Nov 11, 2007 1:19 am

Shujjah wrote:
Mkall wrote:Shujjah, you have to realize that this website is owned and visited by mainly Western World inhabitants, whose traditions are not as rigid as your culture's. Therefore what we call decent is probably not so to you. I'm sorry if all it takes for you to leave is one sig, but to the majority of the site's visitors, that sig is perfectly decent, well within the site's PG-13 rating.

It's something you'll have to get used to if you foray around the Internet. If you think the sigs here are too offencive, than you've precluded yourself from at least 70% of the Internet.

thanks i think that is the case anyways i dont i think Burn's sig is ok now no worries

i have firefox now how to block images with it?

I'll PM.

by **Shujjah** » Sun Nov 11, 2007 6:46 am

thanks a lot Wingspan it works !!!

now Cons watch out Shujjah is back!!!!!

News Credits: 1 · by **Jeep?** » Sun Nov 11, 2007 7:28 am

Caelus wrote:And historically Burn's sigs have always paled in comparison to those of two other posters, so why his sigs specifically would be an issue I can't imagine.

Was I one of them?

by **Shujjah** » Sun Nov 11, 2007 7:34 am

It was not Burn's sig it was many others also

News Credits: 38 · by **Sunstar** » Sun Nov 11, 2007 3:06 pm

Jeep? wrote:
Caelus wrote:And historically Burn's sigs have always paled in comparison to those of two other posters, so why his sigs specifically would be an issue I can't imagine.

Was I one of them?

I think it was your feeet.

by **Waylander** » Sun Nov 11, 2007 3:14 pm

i like burns sigs myself,like i like my avatar :grin:

oh yeah, welcome back,if you stay :BOT:

in V2,i will see you in some missions most likely,from the :CON:

side.

News Credits: 38 · by **Sunstar** » Sun Nov 11, 2007 5:05 pm

Waylander wrote:i like burns sigs myself,like i like my avatar

oh yeah, welcome back,if you stay in V2,i will see you in some missions most likely,from the side.

burns sigs are nice, and I am a female.. btw I am mesmerised by your avatar.... :shock:

But to appeal to me, we need more sigs and avatars with nice feet in it.

News Credits: 2 · by **Wingspan** » Sun Nov 11, 2007 5:21 pm

Feet?

News Credits: 38 · by **Sunstar** » Sun Nov 11, 2007 7:17 pm

yeah feet.

Like KAMJIIN on Facebook · by **KAMJIIN** » Sun Nov 11, 2007 7:26 pm

how's this?

by **Deadpool.** » Sun Nov 11, 2007 7:29 pm

KAMJIIN wrote:how's this?

LMAO!

Those are foot soldiers... :lol:

News Credits: 38 · by **Sunstar** » Sun Nov 11, 2007 7:47 pm

not quite the right sort of feet...

Seeker feet, Caspar feet... duck feet, lizard feet.. weee

News Credits: 226 · by **Burn** » Sun Nov 11, 2007 7:49 pm

Someone has a foot fetish ....

News Credits: 1 · by **Redimus** » Sun Nov 11, 2007 7:58 pm

Transformers dont wear shoes, or socks... Does this mean they offend too?

by **Tammuz** » Sun Nov 11, 2007 7:58 pm

pedophile.
ped=foot, phile-lover, yes you yanks can't spell things right

News Credits: 6 · by **Dr. Caelus** » Sun Nov 11, 2007 7:59 pm

KAMJIIN wrote:how's this?

Ah, how I miss the days when they were color coded. When you ran into white-clad ninjas, you knew you were in trouble.

Although the little Fire-Hydrant droids with the electrified tentacles were really annoying too.

News Credits: 38 · by **Sunstar** » Sun Nov 11, 2007 9:01 pm

wasn't it a Podiophole or something to that effect? I can never spell either

News Credits: 42 · by **Psychout** » Sun Nov 11, 2007 9:03 pm

I always thought those mouser robots were cool, the way they just munched through everything.

I really wanted one as a pet.

News Credits: 6 · by **Dr. Caelus** » Sun Nov 11, 2007 9:06 pm

Psychout wrote:I always thought those mouser robots were cool, the way they just munched through everything.

Yeah, but they got screwed for a good toy in the original run. That one big wind up toy was just... lame. Needed every one of the figures to come with one or two little ones. Or maybe a special pack that just had thirty little ones.