The Energon Pub

If in TF 2 Bonecrusher gets resurrected or something, would it be cool if he wants to get revenge on Optimus Prime and they have longer battle with more action? If he has to be reformated , what other form should he take? And what if Unicron shows in the film and Bonecrusher becomes his servant? This topic is entirely for Bonecrusher and his role in the film. Write here your thoughts about this short-casting character.

An_de wrote:If in TF 2 Bonecrusher gets resurrected or something, would it be cool if he wants to get revenge on Optimus Prime and they have longer battle with more action?.

I wouldn't be impressed but I also wouldn't surprised, Bay is well know for lazily reusing ideas, action sequences and even footage from his previous films.

An_de wrote:And what if Unicron shows in the film and Bonecrusher becomes his servant?

Never gonna happen.

An_de wrote:Write here your thoughts about this short-casting character.

What character?

Yours AK

Alex Kingdom wrote:

An_de wrote:Write here your thoughts about this short-casting character.

What character?

Yours AK

I was talking about Bonecrusher of course, who else?

An_de wrote:

An_de wrote:

An_de wrote:Write here your thoughts about this short-casting character.

What character?

Yours AK

I was talking about Bonecrusher of course, who else?

I think you missed his point, An_de!

I wrote:If he has to be reformated , what other form should he take?.

Any suggestions?

An_de wrote:

I wrote:If he has to be reformated , what other form should he take?.

Any suggestions?

A toaster? Who cares? What I mean is he was barely in the movie for five minutes and had no character whatsoever, so why bring him back?

Yours AK

The thing is, you've picked a character who really did very little in the movie. He could just as easily be replaced by a completely new fellow, so I'm not sure why he'd be reformatted at all.

That said, if he is reformatted, I'm sure people wouldn't mind if he became a bulldozer. Personally, if he does come back, I'd rather see them explore why he supposedly hates stuff so much and how he interacts with his fellow Decepticons. Is his hatred a blind hatred or is there a more reasoned, considered explanation for it? That, to me, would be more interesting than him being given a new alt.mode.

Leonardo wrote:The thing is, you've picked a character who really did very little in the movie. He could just as easily be replaced by a completely new fellow, so I'm not sure why he'd be reformatted at all.

That said, if he is reformatted, I'm sure people wouldn't mind if he became a bulldozer. Personally, if he does come back, I'd rather see them explore why he supposedly hates stuff so much and how he interacts with his fellow Decepticons. Is his hatred a blind hatred or is there a more reasoned, considered explanation for it? That, to me, would be more interesting than him being given a new alt.mode.

Well I was very disappointed about his short showing in the film too. And that's why I want to have your opinion about his action during his short cast. I mean if he was in the movie longer time, would that increase his fan number?

Not really.

Man, Bonecrusher was awesome. Rolling transformation, flipping cars out of his way, shoulder checks THROUGH a bus, then while on fire he flying tackles Optimus Prime.

Sorry, but to me that's a hell of alot more "character" then StarScream/Scorpinok/Blackout and Brawl all put together.

Bonecrusher demonstrated that he's got big balls. I can't picture Blackout going after Prime with a flying tackle.

I don't think we were supposed to get to know, or relate with the Decepticons at all. I think they were just there to be 'The Monster'

It might do. It's not about the duration of screentime, though. It's about what he does and how he's developed during that screentime.

Malikon wrote:I don't think we were supposed to get to know, or relate with the Decepticons at all. I think they were just there to be 'The Monster'

Very true, is that right tho? Should the Decepticons just be monsters for the humans (with the help of the Autobots) to defeat? Personally I dont think so.

Yours AK

I'd like him to come back, cos I think the rest of the Cons need to have a pet that hates everything!

I would want Bonecrusher to come back, because he didnt talk as much as he should have done, then again neither did Brawl or Blackout

I don't like him. He's like a bulldog.

I just like his alternate mode, the Buffalo anti-mine/resistance vehicle. It's cool. We can use it to overcome traffic jam on the streets.

Metroplex could use him as a fork. A fork for really big foodstuffs. Foodstuffs that Transformers...don't eat.

I didn't think that one through.

He's pretty much tankor from beast machines (pre rhinox revelation) from what I can remember of the show.

Leonardo wrote:The thing is, you've picked a character who really did very little in the movie. He could just as easily be replaced by a completely new fellow, so I'm not sure why he'd be reformatted at all.

That said, if he is reformatted, I'm sure people wouldn't mind if he became a bulldozer. Personally, if he does come back, I'd rather see them explore why he supposedly hates stuff so much and how he interacts with his fellow Decepticons. Is his hatred a blind hatred or is there a more reasoned, considered explanation for it? That, to me, would be more interesting than him being given a new alt.mode.

I thought that the Constructicons would need him in the next movie so they could form Devastator.

An_de wrote:

Leonardo wrote:The thing is, you've picked a character who really did very little in the movie. He could just as easily be replaced by a completely new fellow, so I'm not sure why he'd be reformatted at all.

That said, if he is reformatted, I'm sure people wouldn't mind if he became a bulldozer. Personally, if he does come back, I'd rather see them explore why he supposedly hates stuff so much and how he interacts with his fellow Decepticons. Is his hatred a blind hatred or is there a more reasoned, considered explanation for it? That, to me, would be more interesting than him being given a new alt.mode.

I thought that the Constructicons would need him in the next movie so they could form Devastator.

It is not even certain if the Constructicons will form a gestalt, or Devastator is called Devastator, or that the constructicons will have the original members...

The Fallen. wrote:

An_de wrote:

Leonardo wrote:The thing is, you've picked a character who really did very little in the movie. He could just as easily be replaced by a completely new fellow, so I'm not sure why he'd be reformatted at all.

That said, if he is reformatted, I'm sure people wouldn't mind if he became a bulldozer. Personally, if he does come back, I'd rather see them explore why he supposedly hates stuff so much and how he interacts with his fellow Decepticons. Is his hatred a blind hatred or is there a more reasoned, considered explanation for it? That, to me, would be more interesting than him being given a new alt.mode.

I thought that the Constructicons would need him in the next movie so they could form Devastator.

It is not even certain if the Constructicons will form a gestalt, or Devastator is called Devastator, or that the constructicons will have the original members...

It would be cool if they do

The Fallen. wrote:

An_de wrote:

Leonardo wrote:The thing is, you've picked a character who really did very little in the movie. He could just as easily be replaced by a completely new fellow, so I'm not sure why he'd be reformatted at all.

That said, if he is reformatted, I'm sure people wouldn't mind if he became a bulldozer. Personally, if he does come back, I'd rather see them explore why he supposedly hates stuff so much and how he interacts with his fellow Decepticons. Is his hatred a blind hatred or is there a more reasoned, considered explanation for it? That, to me, would be more interesting than him being given a new alt.mode.

I thought that the Constructicons would need him in the next movie so they could form Devastator.

It is not even certain if the Constructicons will form a gestalt, or Devastator is called Devastator, or that the constructicons will have the original members...

Exactly this aint G1, so Boncrusher doesn't have to be a Constructicon, the Constructicons dont have to be combiners, and the combined form does not have to be called Devestator, in fact it's unlikely he will becuase Bay changed Brawls name to Devestator in the movie. As pointed out in another thread the Combaticons/Bruticus would actually be a more likley combiner for TF2 seeing as non of their names have been used and they turn inot military vehicles.

Yours AK

Alex Kingdom wrote:

The Fallen. wrote:

An_de wrote:

Leonardo wrote:The thing is, you've picked a character who really did very little in the movie. He could just as easily be replaced by a completely new fellow, so I'm not sure why he'd be reformatted at all.

That said, if he is reformatted, I'm sure people wouldn't mind if he became a bulldozer. Personally, if he does come back, I'd rather see them explore why he supposedly hates stuff so much and how he interacts with his fellow Decepticons. Is his hatred a blind hatred or is there a more reasoned, considered explanation for it? That, to me, would be more interesting than him being given a new alt.mode.

I thought that the Constructicons would need him in the next movie so they could form Devastator.

It is not even certain if the Constructicons will form a gestalt, or Devastator is called Devastator, or that the constructicons will have the original members...

Exactly this aint G1, so Boncrusher doesn't have to be a Constructicon, the Constructicons dont have to be combiners, and the combined form does not have to be called Devestator, in fact it's unlikely he will becuase Bay changed Brawls name to Devestator in the movie. As pointed out in another thread the Combaticons/Bruticus would actually be a more likley combiner for TF2 seeing as non of their names have been used and they turn inot military vehicles.

Yours AK

Poorly it's true. I hope Bay doesn't change the story much...

An_de wrote:Poorly it's true. I hope Bay doesn't change the story much...

Erm..he already has hasn't he? The Transformers didn't crash land in the Ark, they didn't lay offline for millions of years until a volcanic erruption reawoke Teletran-1, they look like twistied metal car crash debris in robot mode, the matrix is called the allspark and its a giant cube, Jazz and Megatron have already kicked the bucket, etc..etc.. I think that ship has sailed.

Yours AK

Alex Kingdom wrote:

An_de wrote:Poorly it's true. I hope Bay doesn't change the story much...

Erm..he already has hasn't he? The Transformers didn't crash land in the Ark, they didn't lay offline for millions of years until a volcanic erruption reawoke Teletran-1, they look like twistied metal car crash debris in robot mode, the matrix is called the allspark and its a giant cube, Jazz and Megatron have already kicked the bucket, etc..etc.. I think that ship has sailed.

Yours AK

I was talking besides that. And you forgot to mention that AUTOBOT = AUTONOMOUS ROBOT

An_de wrote:

Alex Kingdom wrote:

An_de wrote:Poorly it's true. I hope Bay doesn't change the story much...

Erm..he already has hasn't he? The Transformers didn't crash land in the Ark, they didn't lay offline for millions of years until a volcanic erruption reawoke Teletran-1, they look like twistied metal car crash debris in robot mode, the matrix is called the allspark and its a giant cube, Jazz and Megatron have already kicked the bucket, etc..etc.. I think that ship has sailed.

Yours AK

I was talking besides that. And you forgot to mention that AUTOBOT = AUTONOMOUS ROBOT

Well if you think from this point forward Bays going to suddenly become strictly faithful to G1 continuity then you're in for another disappointing movie and Bay really could not care less.

Yours AK