The Energon Pub

U heard it folks bond 22 finally has a name!
Here's a link to the official movie site http://www.007.com/
This will mark Daniel Creigs 2nd outing as 007. Let the discussion begin!

common nobody has any thoughts?

heres a thought. i hate daniel craig

why? Casino Royale was the top grossing Bond film ever. If people hated him I don't think people would like Casino Royale. Now I admit he's no Pierce Brosnan but he brings a toughness that Connary had. He's got the wrong hair, but so did Roger Morre, who was the worst bond IMAO I don't get what people see in him. He's about as threatining as a butterfly.

I hear it's about Bond, and he takes over people's bodies, helping with their problems so he can jump to another body, hoping each time that it's his own.

...Wait...that might have been another Quantum thing...

Mr.Bond007 wrote: but so did Roger Morre,

I think the only role I cred about was him playing himself in Cannonball Run. Even then, he ejected himself out of his own car.

Mr.Bond007 wrote:why? Casino Royale was the top grossing Bond film ever. If people hated him I don't think people would like Casino Royale. Now I admit he's no Pierce Brosnan but he brings a toughness that Connary had. He's got the wrong hair, but so did Roger Morre, who was the worst bond IMAO I don't get what people see in him. He's about as threatining as a butterfly.

Individual oppinion has nothing to do with how much money the movie made. I hated the Spider man movies, and they made millions.

Though I haven't seen CR yet, I'm not exactly encouraged by any movie with the word 'Quantum' in the title. Unless the word 'Leap' comes right after it. At least with this being a Bond film, the mindless technobabble will be drowned out by...well, the usual Bond Approach.

Reading the story at the 007 webpage is a little vague. One point I found interesting though, is that it picks up where CR left off. I don't think I have ever seen a Bond "sequal" in this sense. It seems every Bond film is an entity of it's own, and only bits of past movies show up in sequals. I wonder if this one will bring back the gadgets.

i loved casino royale. it was a breath of fresh air from the gadget-crazy brosnan-bond i grew up with (don't get me wrong, i love goldeneye). despite the wacky title, i'm looking forward to QoS.

BumbleScream84 wrote:Reading the story at the 007 webpage is a little vague. One point I found interesting though, is that it picks up where CR left off. I don't think I have ever seen a Bond "sequal" in this sense. It seems every Bond film is an entity of it's own, and only bits of past movies show up in sequals. I wonder if this one will bring back the gadgets.

they'll be some, Q and Moneypenny aren't in it though. The DBS is comming back with a few gadgets.

Mr.Bond007 wrote: The DBS is comming back with a few gadgets.

Don't get me wrong, the Aston Martin makes the movie, but I think he needs to diss the Aston and get a Vauxhall Lightning. It'd be a fresh change.

Mr.Bond007 wrote:they'll be some, Q and Moneypenny aren't in it though. The DBS is comming back with a few gadgets.

The lack of Q in a Bond film doesn't bother me, since Desmond Llewelyn was the epitome of that character.

Sherade wrote:

Mr.Bond007 wrote: The DBS is comming back with a few gadgets.

Don't get me wrong, the Aston Martin makes the movie, but I think he needs to diss the Aston and get a Vauxhall Lightning. It'd be a fresh change.

Meh a DBS is good enough for me. However Aston Martin's deal end with this bond movie so who knows what car bond 23 will have?

That name's all right I guess. Not very Bond sounding. There's a Bond novel (not by Ian Fleming) called Never Dream of Dying. Don't know how good that is, but damn, that's a Bond title.


But that's all right. What's a name anyway? Olga Kurylenko is all that matters. Well, that and the action, but she's slightly more important.