Transformers and More @ The Seibertron Store
Details subject to change. See listing for latest price and availability.
Saber Prime wrote:So I was thinking. I'm going to use one of my fav. episodes of Star Trek as an example.
You remember in TNG when Q made Picard jump between 3 different time period versions of himself? One was his present self, one was back when he first started as Captain of the Enterprise D, and the 3rd was the future.
Now in the future Picard saw he had Married and divorced Beverly Crusher. Jordy had his "hologrphic eyes" or whatever it was that allowed him to see without haveing to wear his visor. I can't remember weather or not Data had an emotion chip in that future. I don't think he did but I do remember his grey hair dye. All of the crew had kida drifted apart and not really kept in touch in that future.
It was stated at the end of that episode that Picard had told everyone the future he saw knowing that it would turn out differently anyway just because he had seen it.
So my question to you is this. Are the characters of the current time as seen in recent movies and guest appearances on DS9 and Voyager the same characters or different characters than in the alternate future that Picard saw in that episode of TNG?
I see them as the same characters but I'm just wandering what your opinion is.
Predaprince wrote:I am very thankful to have posters like sto_vo_kor_2000 who is so energetic about improving others' understanding and enjoyment of the TF universe
Stormrider wrote:You often add interesting insights to conversations that makes the fledglings think and challenges even the sharpest minds
T-Macksimus wrote:I consider you and editor to be amongst the most "scholarly" in terms of your knowledge, demeanor and general approach
sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:Saber Prime wrote:I belive you're thinking of when Vector Prime is exsplaining about the Cyber Planet Keys in Cybertron. They show 4 transformers in the flash back that look verry much like Optimus Prime, Ultra Magnus, and two others I can't quite remember at this moment. I think Jazz was one of them. They all looked like G1 characters however the way Vector Prime describes them they sound like they're as old as he is so they can't be the same characters from G1, they just look like them.
Why should they look as old as he is????He may have been seeing then trew time.
But what did I say before about how alternate universes are formed? An alternate universe is nothing more than an alternate future. From that point in the series Picard was allready heading tword both possibilities at the same time.sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:To answer you question depends on wether or not Q jumped Picard into a alternate universe's future or the future that would have happened if something had not interviened.
Leonardo wrote:But you haven't answered anything.
Sledge wrote:Tell you what, Saber. If you want to stop arguing the mess of junk you've tangled yourself up in, we can return to an earlier point: why on Earth do you think identical twins have different DNA?
Saber Prime wrote:Sorry it was late when I was typing this. The part in bold made no sence the way I wrote it before, lots of typos and words that really didn't need to be there.
Basically though I was saying they SOUNDED like they're as old as Vector Prime not they SHOULD LOOK as old as him. I wrote should where I ment to say sound.
Saber Prime wrote:But what did I say before about how alternate universes are formed? An alternate universe is nothing more than an alternate future. From that point in the series Picard was allready heading tword both possibilities at the same time.sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:To answer you question depends on wether or not Q jumped Picard into a alternate universe's future or the future that would have happened if something had not interviened.
Now obviously Picard has not yet and maybe never will marry Beverly Crusher in the current time line or "branch" but he did on the other branch.
Saber Prime wrote:What about the episode another star fleet ship came out of a time vortex into the curent time. The ship caused time to shift turning the TNG crew into a war ship. Worf was no longer on the Enterprise in this time line because the Klingons were at war with the Federation. Ginan (Woopy Goldburgs character) was the only one on the ship who realized that time had shifted.
I belive this to be an alternate dimention but that's just me. Sence it is just an alternate time line are the crew of the War Ship Enterprise the same as the Crew of the Exsploration Ship Enterprise?
Predaprince wrote:I am very thankful to have posters like sto_vo_kor_2000 who is so energetic about improving others' understanding and enjoyment of the TF universe
Stormrider wrote:You often add interesting insights to conversations that makes the fledglings think and challenges even the sharpest minds
T-Macksimus wrote:I consider you and editor to be amongst the most "scholarly" in terms of your knowledge, demeanor and general approach
Saber Prime wrote:Sledge wrote:Tell you what, Saber. If you want to stop arguing the mess of junk you've tangled yourself up in, we can return to an earlier point: why on Earth do you think identical twins have different DNA?
If their DNA was identical it would be impossible to tell them apart. Everything from fingerprints to personality would be exactly identicle. Even alergies and all sorts of other traits would be exactly the same.
The only thing that's truly identicle is their appearance. Nothing else is.
Predaprince wrote:I am very thankful to have posters like sto_vo_kor_2000 who is so energetic about improving others' understanding and enjoyment of the TF universe
Stormrider wrote:You often add interesting insights to conversations that makes the fledglings think and challenges even the sharpest minds
T-Macksimus wrote:I consider you and editor to be amongst the most "scholarly" in terms of your knowledge, demeanor and general approach
Fingerprints will definitely be different from he original one...sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:Saber Prime wrote:Sledge wrote:Tell you what, Saber. If you want to stop arguing the mess of junk you've tangled yourself up in, we can return to an earlier point: why on Earth do you think identical twins have different DNA?
If their DNA was identical it would be impossible to tell them apart. Everything from fingerprints to personality would be exactly identicle. Even alergies and all sorts of other traits would be exactly the same.
The only thing that's truly identicle is their appearance. Nothing else is.
I've said this to you before....wether the DNA is identicle or not finger prints would not be the same.Even clones have different prints.And I'm not talking about Si-Fi- clones....I'm talking about the real life clones of animales that have been made.The prints of there paws or what ever have been different then the original.
I gave you a scourse a few pages back. Go to a local high school, pick up a science book, read up on DNA.Sledge wrote:Saber, I'm not asking you to explain your rubbish, I'm asking you to prove it. Every book, website, piece of research I've ever encountered on the subject says you're wrong. Cite your source, or admit you made a boo boo.
Saber Prime wrote:I gave you a scourse a few pages back. Go to a local high school, pick up a science book, read up on DNA.Sledge wrote:Saber, I'm not asking you to explain your rubbish, I'm asking you to prove it. Every book, website, piece of research I've ever encountered on the subject says you're wrong. Cite your source, or admit you made a boo boo.
My Elementry school sucked and was lacking the money department but my high school sure wasn't.
Sonora Uninion High School graduate thank you verry much.
Make sure it's up to date information too. The information you're getting sounds like it came from 30 something years ago.
Identical twins.
Identical twins occur when a single egg is fertilized to form one zygote (monozygotic) which then divides into two separate embryos. Although their traits and physical appearances are not exactly the same due to environmental conditions both in and outside the womb, they do have identical DNA. This is not considered to be a hereditary trait, but rather an anomaly that occurs in birthing at a rate of about 3 in every 1000 deliveries worldwide, regardless of ethnic background. The two embryos develop into fetuses sharing the same womb. When one egg is fertilized by one sperm cell, and then divides and separates, two identical cells will result. If the zygote splits very early (in the first 2 days after fertilization) they may develop separate placentas (chorion) and separate sacs (amnion). These are called dichorionic, diamniotic (or "di/di") twins, which occurs 20-30% of the time. Most of the time in identical twins the zygote will split after 2 days, resulting in a shared placenta, but two separate sacs. These are called monochorionic, diamniotic ("mono/di") twins.
In about 1% of identical twins the splitting occurs late enough to result in both a shared placenta and a shared sac called; monochorionic, monoamniotic ("mono/mono") twins. Finally, the zygote may split extremely late, resulting in conjoined twins. Mortality is highest for conjoined twins due to the many complications resulting from shared organs. Mono/mono twins have an overall in-utero mortality of about 60%, principally due to cord entanglement prior to 32 weeks gestation. Many times, monoamniotic twins are delivered at 32 weeks electively for the safety of the babies. In higher order multiples, there can sometimes be a combination of fraternal/identical twins.
Mono/di twins have about a 25% mortality due to twin-twin transfusion. Di/di twins have the lowest mortality risk at about 9%, although that is still significantly higher than that of singletons.
Monozygotic twins are genetically identical (unless there has been a mutation in development) and they are usually the same sex. (On rare occasions, Monozygotic twins may express different phenotypes (normally due to an environmental factor or the deactivation of different X chromosomes in monozygotic female twins), and in some extremely rare cases, due to aneuploidy, twins may express different sexual phenotypes, normally due to an XXY Klinefelter's syndrome zygote splitting unevenly. Monozygotic twins generally look alike. Although they do not have the same fingerprints (which are environmental as well as genetic). As they mature, identical twins often become less alike because of lifestyle choices or external influences. Genetically speaking, the children of identical twins are half-siblings rather than cousins. If each member of one set of identical twins marries one member of another set of identical twins then the resulting children would be genetic full siblings. It is estimated that there are around 10 million identical twins and triplets in the world.
The likelihood of a single fertilisation resulting in identical twins appears to be a random event, not a hereditary trait, and is uniformly distributed in all populations around the world.[citation needed] This is in marked contrast to fraternal twinning which ranges from about 6 per thousand births in Japan (almost similar to the rate of identical twins, which is around 4-5) to 15 and more per thousand in some parts of India(and up to 24 in the US, which might mainly be due to IVF, in vitro fertilisation). The exact cause for the splitting of a zygote or embryo is unknown.
Studies have shown that identical twins reared in different environments share similar personality traits, mannerisms, job choices, attitudes, and interests. These findings add to the belief that many behaviors are derived from genes.[citation needed]
Identical twins have identical DNA but differing environmental influences throughout their lives affect which genes are switched on or off. This is called epigenetic modification. A study of 80 pairs of human twins ranging in age from 3 to 74 showed that the youngest twins have relatively few epigenetic differences. The number of epigenetic differences between identical twins increases with age. 50-year-old twins had over three times the epigenetic difference of 3-year-old twins. Twins who had spent their lives apart (such as those adopted by two different sets of parents at birth) had the greatest difference. However, certain characteristics become more alike as twins age, such as IQ and personality. This phenomenon illustrates the influence of genetics in many aspects of human characteristics and behaviour.
A new theory (July 3, 2007) found that identical twins are formed after an embryo essentially collapses, splitting the progenitor cells (those that contain the body's fundamental genetic material) in half. That leaves the same genetic material divided in two on opposite sides of the embryo. Eventually, two separate fetuses develop. The research was presented at a meeting of the European Society for Human Reproduction and Embryology in Lyon, France. Utilizing computer software to take photos every 2 minutes of 33 embryos growing in a laboratory, Dr. Dianna Payne, a visiting research fellow at the Mio Fertility Clinic in Japan, documented for the first time the early days of twin development. Payne also discovered explanation for why in-vitro fertilization techniques are more likely to create twins. Only about 3 pairs of twins per 1,000 deliveries occur as a result of natural conception. But for IVF deliveries, there are nearly 21 pairs of twins for every 1,000.Also, the latest twin study found that ability to listen to 2 things at once is largely inherited. Thus, listening to someone talking, speech entering the right ear travels in large part to the left side of the brain, where language is processed. Speech entering the left ear travels first to the right side of the brain before crossing to the brain's language center on the left side by way of the corpus callosum, a pathway connecting the brain's right and left hemispheres. NIDCD researchers based this finding from studies of identical and fraternal twins (national twins festival in Twinsburg, OH, during the years 2002 through 2005). 194 same-sex pairs of twins participated in the study (138 identical pairs and 56 fraternal pairs), representing ages 12 through 50. Researchers found a significantly higher correlation among identical twins than fraternal twins, indicating that differences in performance for those activities had a strong genetic component. It was found that if a trait is purely genetic, identical twins, who share the same DNA, will be alike nearly 100 percent of the time, while fraternal twins, who share roughly half of their DNA, will be less similar. Conversely, if a trait is primarily due to a person's environment, both identical and fraternal twins should have roughly the same degree of similarity, since most twins grow up in the same household.
question
Submitted by Adrian, a high school teacher in Pasadena, California.
My students ask me this question all the time and I am stumped. Are fingerprints the same for twins? That is, are they based on development, on the genetic code, or a combination of both? On a molecular level, would two twins have the same DNA fingerprint? (Basically, how genetically identical are they?)
answer
Provided by Max Heiman, HHMI predoctoral fellow at the University of California, San Francisco.
I have no doubt your students ask the "twins' fingerprints" question often—I've only received a couple dozen questions through the Ask a Scientist program, and you're already the second to ask about it! I always thought that identical twins did have the same fingerprints, but apparently this is not always true.
In humans (and in most animals), it is hard to predict how the body will take shape during development. Some things are programmed in the DNA, but most seem to happen by chance within the bounds of certain rules. Identifying those rules is a big challenge in developmental biology right now.
In fruit flies, for instance, breathing tubes extend from every cell to the surface of the organism to supply it with oxygen. The complicated branching pattern of these tubes is different in every fly, even ones with the same DNA. But developmental biologists are beginning to understand the rules behind this pattern formation: as cells need oxygen, they send out a signal that causes a tube to grow towards them. So even though every fly seems to have a different pattern, development of these breathing tube patterns is governed by programmed rules.
Fingerprints might be like this—partly genetically preprogrammed and partly made up during development.
As you know, there are different kinds of twins: identical and fraternal. Identical twins come from a single zygote—that is, the fusion of a single sperm cell with a single egg cell. Their DNA is as closely related as the DNA of your hand is to that of your foot—in other words, identical. (However, there are some very interesting exceptions. For example, the immune systems of identical twins might not respond the same way to a disease. Since immune cells rearrange their DNA semi-randomly, the twins would make different sets of antibodies.) But for the most part identical twins' DNA would be identical in sequence, and since the DNA fingerprint is a rough representation of sequence, their DNA fingerprints also would be identical.
Fraternal twins are as related as any pair of siblings. Therefore, their DNA is 50 percent identical. Their DNA fingerprints would also be 50 percent identical (as are the DNA fingerprints of any siblings, or of a parent and child).
I did find one article that I wanted to tell you about: "Comparative diagnoses of twin zygosity by SSLP variant analysis, questionnaire, and dermatoglyphic analysis." Behavior Genetics 1996;6(1):55-63. The authors are Elisabeth Spitz, Rene Moutier, Terry Reed, Marie Claire Busnel, Catherine Marchaland, Pierre L. Roubertoux, and Michele Carlier. Here is my understanding of their work based on reading the paper's abstract.
The authors of that article used three methods to try to determine whether twins are monozygotic (identical), meaning they have the same DNA, or dizygotic (fraternal), meaning they share as much DNA as brothers and sisters do. The three methods were DNA analysis (DNA "fingerprinting"); fingerprint analysis (actual fingerprinting), and having the parents of the twins fill out a questionnaire on how similar the twins are. The authors thought that DNA analysis would enable them to tell every time whether the twins were identical or fraternal. But this approach is still fairly expensive. They found that the questionnaire could correctly identify 97% of the twins as identical or fraternal. Surprisingly, old-fashioned fingerprinting (what they call "dermatoglyphic analysis") was correct only 86% of the time.
You also might like to read about a roundworm called Caenorhabditis elegans. Unlike human cells, C. elegans cells always develop exactly the same way. We know exactly where each cell comes from, starting with the one-cell embryo and ending with the adult worm that has about 1,000 cells in its body. These cells always do everything exactly the same way. For this reason, C. elegans has been a great system for learning about genes that control development.
A private lab in Dallas is set to try something never before attempted by scientists who investigate crimes: separate the DNA of identical twins to try to show which member of the pair committed a crime.
Unlike other people, twins begin life with the same genetic profile because they are formed when a single fertilized egg divides. But tiny mutations are known to occur in DNA, the cellular acid that carries the genetic code, as cells divide during an embryo's growth.
The lab, Orchid Cellmark, hopes to identify those differences to distinguish between the DNA of a pair of twins from Grand Rapids, Mich. The DNA of both men matches a semen sample from a November 1999 rape that was committed by one man.
The experiment is being watched closely by authorities across the nation. They say that in several cases, genetic evidence left at crime scenes — typically blood or semen — has linked identical twins to crimes that only one could have committed. The DNA testing used by law enforcement authorities and the FBI's national DNA database of convicted felons does not detect differences between identical twins.
Police in Virginia, Massachusetts and Texas have had a half-dozen such cases during the past two years, authorities say. Police in the United Kingdom have had several more.
Searching for tiny mutations in DNA is "a lot like looking for a needle in a haystack," says Robert Giles, Orchid Cellmark's director of U.S. operations. But "it also holds the possibility of doing something very useful."
Predaprince wrote:I am very thankful to have posters like sto_vo_kor_2000 who is so energetic about improving others' understanding and enjoyment of the TF universe
Stormrider wrote:You often add interesting insights to conversations that makes the fledglings think and challenges even the sharpest minds
T-Macksimus wrote:I consider you and editor to be amongst the most "scholarly" in terms of your knowledge, demeanor and general approach
Predaprince wrote:I am very thankful to have posters like sto_vo_kor_2000 who is so energetic about improving others' understanding and enjoyment of the TF universe
Stormrider wrote:You often add interesting insights to conversations that makes the fledglings think and challenges even the sharpest minds
T-Macksimus wrote:I consider you and editor to be amongst the most "scholarly" in terms of your knowledge, demeanor and general approach
Police seeing double in rape case involving identical twins
By Matthew Gilbert
Court TV
Monday, June 7, 2004 Posted: 9:07 AM EDT (1307 GMT)
(Court TV) -- Identical twins not only look exactly alike, they have the same DNA. So what happens when that DNA is evidence in a sexual assault case?
Authorities in Grand Rapids, Michigan, are dealing with just that dilemma in the case of a Kendall College of Art and Design female student who was raped on November 23, 1999.
The woman, now 26, was attacked from behind, pushed against a car and sexually assaulted. She reported the assault to police and underwent a sexual assault examination, and doctors sent the sperm found to a state crime laboratory.
With no fingerprints at the scene and the victim unable to give detectives a description of her attacker, the case was at a standstill. But three months ago, the state crime lab matched the DNA found on the rape victim to that of Jerome Cooper, who has been in prison since 2002 on an unrelated home invasion conviction. Like all defendants facing felony charges in Michigan, Cooper had to submit a DNA sample for the state database.
The match seemed to solve the case until a background check on Cooper indicated he has a twin brother, Tyrone. To add to the intrigue, authorities were unsure whether Jerome and Tyrone Cooper were fraternal or identical twins.
Fraternal twins, which account for about two-thirds of twin pregnancies, have different DNA because they come from two different eggs being fertilized at the same time.
"The DNA profiles of fraternal twins differ as much as DNA profiles of any other pair of siblings," said Dan Krane, an associate biology professor at Wright State University in Dayton, Ohio.
Identical twins, however, have the same DNA because they come from one egg that split in half.
Authorities issued a felony warrant for Tyrone Cooper for failing to update his address on the sex offender registry. Tyrone and Jerome Cooper both have a record for sexual assault after pleading no contest to sexually assaulting a 10-year-old girl in 1991 and a 12-year-old girl in 1998, respectively.
Tyrone Cooper was arrested May 20 at his girlfriend's apartment in Kentwood, Michigan. DNA testing revealed that the Cooper twins were identical.
Police will now have to use other means, including investigating the brothers' alibis, to solve the case.
Jerome Cooper told police he was in jail when the rape occurred. However, Grand Rapids police Sgt. Timothy called Cooper's alibi "unsubstantiated." Court records indicate that Cooper was out on bail at the time of the incident.
Calls to Tyrone Cooper's attorney, Frank Carrozza, were not returned.
Williams said authorities will focus much of their energy into looking for eyewitnesses. They will also see if the DNA samples can be further analyzed.
"We are in the process of consulting with half a dozen research labs across the country to see what else can be done," said Williams.
Predaprince wrote:I am very thankful to have posters like sto_vo_kor_2000 who is so energetic about improving others' understanding and enjoyment of the TF universe
Stormrider wrote:You often add interesting insights to conversations that makes the fledglings think and challenges even the sharpest minds
T-Macksimus wrote:I consider you and editor to be amongst the most "scholarly" in terms of your knowledge, demeanor and general approach
A twin zygosity test is a DNA test that definitively shows whether twins are identical or fraternal.
When twins are born, the physician usually is able to tell whether twins are identical or fraternal by examining the placenta. Identical twins usually share a placenta, while fraternal twins are usually in two different placentas.
However, sometimes records can be lost, the placentas might have been discarded or damaged before twin zygosity was determined, or doubt may arise because of the twins’ physical characteristics. In such cases, only a DNA test will be able to reveal the truth. A twin zygosity test compares the twins’ DNA profiles to see whether they match—an exact match proves that the twins are identical.
The results of a twin zygosity test may be used to satisfy personal curiosity as well as to help solve health problems for the twins later down the road. For example, in the event that a twin needs an organ or tissue transplant donor, the identical twin is a perfect choice.
Identical vs. Fraternal Twins
Identical twins come from one fertilized egg, called a zygote. The zygote, which usually develops into one child, grows and splits early in development to form two embryos—identical twins. Because the twins come from one egg and one sperm, they have exactly the same DNA.
Fraternal twins, on the other hand, develop when there are two different eggs in the mother’s womb that are fertilized by two different sperms. Fraternal twins will not have exactly the same DNA, although like other siblings, they can be expected to share some of the DNA they inherit from both parents.
Predaprince wrote:I am very thankful to have posters like sto_vo_kor_2000 who is so energetic about improving others' understanding and enjoyment of the TF universe
Stormrider wrote:You often add interesting insights to conversations that makes the fledglings think and challenges even the sharpest minds
T-Macksimus wrote:I consider you and editor to be amongst the most "scholarly" in terms of your knowledge, demeanor and general approach
Saber Prime wrote:Leonardo wrote:But you haven't answered anything.
But I have, it's all exsplained in great detail over the last 3 or 4 pages. In other words go back and read what's allready been said. You're just asking me to exsplain things that I allready exsplained just a few hours ago in fact.
I answered questions then found myself reading the exact same questions I had literally just posted answers to.
I'm not in the habbit of repeating myself so this is the last time you'll get an answer from me. Go back and read what's allready been said.
When you got something new to talk about then I'll answer you. Till then go back and read.
Leonardo wrote:Saber Prime wrote:Leonardo wrote:But you haven't answered anything.
But I have, it's all exsplained in great detail over the last 3 or 4 pages. In other words go back and read what's allready been said. You're just asking me to exsplain things that I allready exsplained just a few hours ago in fact.
I answered questions then found myself reading the exact same questions I had literally just posted answers to.
I'm not in the habbit of repeating myself so this is the last time you'll get an answer from me. Go back and read what's allready been said.
When you got something new to talk about then I'll answer you. Till then go back and read.
No. I've read the pages. Your evidence doesn't support your argument. It's possible that there are multiple multiverses but the evidence you give doesn't prove your point. All your arguments do is suggest that there are different universes. The concept of multiverses is fine and your discussion about different continuities is fine but your application of the latter as evidence for the former is a jump in logic. In other words, different continuities could be in different multiverses but they're not necessarily in different multiverses.
Predaprince wrote:I am very thankful to have posters like sto_vo_kor_2000 who is so energetic about improving others' understanding and enjoyment of the TF universe
Stormrider wrote:You often add interesting insights to conversations that makes the fledglings think and challenges even the sharpest minds
T-Macksimus wrote:I consider you and editor to be amongst the most "scholarly" in terms of your knowledge, demeanor and general approach
sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:It looks like your High school fed you info that was 20 years out of date at the time they gave it to you because even I remember when my Twins were born that I took a parenting class on twins and the subject of DNA came up and we were told then that the DNA would be the same if they were Identical twins.
And they were born in 1984.If I'm right thats at least 1 year before you were born.
I can live with that.sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:Leonardo wrote:Saber Prime wrote:Leonardo wrote:But you haven't answered anything.
But I have, it's all exsplained in great detail over the last 3 or 4 pages. In other words go back and read what's allready been said. You're just asking me to exsplain things that I allready exsplained just a few hours ago in fact.
I answered questions then found myself reading the exact same questions I had literally just posted answers to.
I'm not in the habbit of repeating myself so this is the last time you'll get an answer from me. Go back and read what's allready been said.
When you got something new to talk about then I'll answer you. Till then go back and read.
No. I've read the pages. Your evidence doesn't support your argument. It's possible that there are multiple multiverses but the evidence you give doesn't prove your point. All your arguments do is suggest that there are different universes. The concept of multiverses is fine and your discussion about different continuities is fine but your application of the latter as evidence for the former is a jump in logic. In other words, different continuities could be in different multiverses but they're not necessarily in different multiverses.
The argument is mute either way.Even if he choeses to believe that they come from different multiverses ,witch is his right ...and his theroy may apply to other works of fiction, they do not apply to the issue at hand.
DC has officaly stated that all of its animated shows and characters belong to one multiverse.
Hasbro has also officaly stated that all of its TF universe's are part of one big multiverse.
Even if his theroy has merrit and some chose the subscribe to it [I dont] it just doesnt apply the the multiverse's we have been talking about.
I've been trying to make heads or tails of what he's been saying for a while now......but his method for judgeing the issues is not very logical....he has some intresting points but they dont fit into the most commonly held ideas as to what a multiverse is.....but he's intitaled to his view.
Saber Prime wrote:sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:It looks like your High school fed you info that was 20 years out of date at the time they gave it to you because even I remember when my Twins were born that I took a parenting class on twins and the subject of DNA came up and we were told then that the DNA would be the same if they were Identical twins.
And they were born in 1984.If I'm right thats at least 1 year before you were born.
2 years. I was born in 86
Predaprince wrote:I am very thankful to have posters like sto_vo_kor_2000 who is so energetic about improving others' understanding and enjoyment of the TF universe
Stormrider wrote:You often add interesting insights to conversations that makes the fledglings think and challenges even the sharpest minds
T-Macksimus wrote:I consider you and editor to be amongst the most "scholarly" in terms of your knowledge, demeanor and general approach
Saber Prime wrote:I can live with that.sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:Leonardo wrote:Saber Prime wrote:Leonardo wrote:But you haven't answered anything.
But I have, it's all exsplained in great detail over the last 3 or 4 pages. In other words go back and read what's allready been said. You're just asking me to exsplain things that I allready exsplained just a few hours ago in fact.
I answered questions then found myself reading the exact same questions I had literally just posted answers to.
I'm not in the habbit of repeating myself so this is the last time you'll get an answer from me. Go back and read what's allready been said.
When you got something new to talk about then I'll answer you. Till then go back and read.
No. I've read the pages. Your evidence doesn't support your argument. It's possible that there are multiple multiverses but the evidence you give doesn't prove your point. All your arguments do is suggest that there are different universes. The concept of multiverses is fine and your discussion about different continuities is fine but your application of the latter as evidence for the former is a jump in logic. In other words, different continuities could be in different multiverses but they're not necessarily in different multiverses.
The argument is mute either way.Even if he choeses to believe that they come from different multiverses ,witch is his right ...and his theroy may apply to other works of fiction, they do not apply to the issue at hand.
DC has officaly stated that all of its animated shows and characters belong to one multiverse.
Hasbro has also officaly stated that all of its TF universe's are part of one big multiverse.
Even if his theroy has merrit and some chose the subscribe to it [I dont] it just doesnt apply the the multiverse's we have been talking about.
I've been trying to make heads or tails of what he's been saying for a while now......but his method for judgeing the issues is not very logical....he has some intresting points but they dont fit into the most commonly held ideas as to what a multiverse is.....but he's intitaled to his view.
Predaprince wrote:I am very thankful to have posters like sto_vo_kor_2000 who is so energetic about improving others' understanding and enjoyment of the TF universe
Stormrider wrote:You often add interesting insights to conversations that makes the fledglings think and challenges even the sharpest minds
T-Macksimus wrote:I consider you and editor to be amongst the most "scholarly" in terms of your knowledge, demeanor and general approach
Not really, I never ask for anyone to agree with me, just to understand my point of view. I think you've gotten as close as you'll get to that understanding part.sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:Saber Prime wrote:I can live with that.sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:Leonardo wrote:Saber Prime wrote:Leonardo wrote:But you haven't answered anything.
But I have, it's all exsplained in great detail over the last 3 or 4 pages. In other words go back and read what's allready been said. You're just asking me to exsplain things that I allready exsplained just a few hours ago in fact.
I answered questions then found myself reading the exact same questions I had literally just posted answers to.
I'm not in the habbit of repeating myself so this is the last time you'll get an answer from me. Go back and read what's allready been said.
When you got something new to talk about then I'll answer you. Till then go back and read.
No. I've read the pages. Your evidence doesn't support your argument. It's possible that there are multiple multiverses but the evidence you give doesn't prove your point. All your arguments do is suggest that there are different universes. The concept of multiverses is fine and your discussion about different continuities is fine but your application of the latter as evidence for the former is a jump in logic. In other words, different continuities could be in different multiverses but they're not necessarily in different multiverses.
The argument is mute either way.Even if he choeses to believe that they come from different multiverses ,witch is his right ...and his theroy may apply to other works of fiction, they do not apply to the issue at hand.
DC has officaly stated that all of its animated shows and characters belong to one multiverse.
Hasbro has also officaly stated that all of its TF universe's are part of one big multiverse.
Even if his theroy has merrit and some chose the subscribe to it [I dont] it just doesnt apply the the multiverse's we have been talking about.
I've been trying to make heads or tails of what he's been saying for a while now......but his method for judgeing the issues is not very logical....he has some intresting points but they dont fit into the most commonly held ideas as to what a multiverse is.....but he's intitaled to his view.
Thats very big of you
Saber Prime wrote:Not really, I never ask for anyone to agree with me, just to understand my point of view. I think you've gotten as close as you'll get to that understanding part.sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:Saber Prime wrote:I can live with that.sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:Leonardo wrote:Saber Prime wrote:Leonardo wrote:But you haven't answered anything.
But I have, it's all exsplained in great detail over the last 3 or 4 pages. In other words go back and read what's allready been said. You're just asking me to exsplain things that I allready exsplained just a few hours ago in fact.
I answered questions then found myself reading the exact same questions I had literally just posted answers to.
I'm not in the habbit of repeating myself so this is the last time you'll get an answer from me. Go back and read what's allready been said.
When you got something new to talk about then I'll answer you. Till then go back and read.
No. I've read the pages. Your evidence doesn't support your argument. It's possible that there are multiple multiverses but the evidence you give doesn't prove your point. All your arguments do is suggest that there are different universes. The concept of multiverses is fine and your discussion about different continuities is fine but your application of the latter as evidence for the former is a jump in logic. In other words, different continuities could be in different multiverses but they're not necessarily in different multiverses.
The argument is mute either way.Even if he choeses to believe that they come from different multiverses ,witch is his right ...and his theroy may apply to other works of fiction, they do not apply to the issue at hand.
DC has officaly stated that all of its animated shows and characters belong to one multiverse.
Hasbro has also officaly stated that all of its TF universe's are part of one big multiverse.
Even if his theroy has merrit and some chose the subscribe to it [I dont] it just doesnt apply the the multiverse's we have been talking about.
I've been trying to make heads or tails of what he's been saying for a while now......but his method for judgeing the issues is not very logical....he has some intresting points but they dont fit into the most commonly held ideas as to what a multiverse is.....but he's intitaled to his view.
Thats very big of you
Predaprince wrote:I am very thankful to have posters like sto_vo_kor_2000 who is so energetic about improving others' understanding and enjoyment of the TF universe
Stormrider wrote:You often add interesting insights to conversations that makes the fledglings think and challenges even the sharpest minds
T-Macksimus wrote:I consider you and editor to be amongst the most "scholarly" in terms of your knowledge, demeanor and general approach
Auto Bot wrote:So, identical twins do not have exactly the same DNA?
Predaprince wrote:I am very thankful to have posters like sto_vo_kor_2000 who is so energetic about improving others' understanding and enjoyment of the TF universe
Stormrider wrote:You often add interesting insights to conversations that makes the fledglings think and challenges even the sharpest minds
T-Macksimus wrote:I consider you and editor to be amongst the most "scholarly" in terms of your knowledge, demeanor and general approach
Return to Transformers General Discussion
Registered users: Bing [Bot], blokefish, Glyph, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Google Feedfetcher, MSN [Bot], Yahoo [Bot], Ziusundra